'Wanderlust' Review (2012)
Hippies do stereotypical things and the laughs are limited
Photo: Universal Pictures
With very little attempt at story or character building Wanderlust gives us George (Paul Rudd) and Linda (Jennifer Aniston), a couple of wannabe upper crust New Yorkers without the means to be such. Things go bad for the couple when they purchase a "micro loft" in the West Village on the belief George will be getting a fat raise and Linda will secure a deal with HBO for her "penguins with testicular cancer" documentary. Their dream, however, is dispensed in a matter of minutes as George loses his job, Linda doesn't get the HBO deal and they are forced to sell their place at a loss and relocate to Atlanta to live with George's brother (Ken Marino) while things get sorted out.
The cast includes Jennifer Aniston, Paul Rudd, Malin Akerman, Justin Theroux and Alan Alda. For more information on this film including pictures, trailers and a detailed synopsis choose from the following menu.
Review
"Wanderlust" is a Universal Pictures release, directed by David Wain and is rated R for sexual content, graphic nudity, language and drug use. The running time is 1 hour 38 minutes.
As their stay progresses, George finds himself in unexpected competition with a hippie named Seth (Justin Theroux) and a corporation is moving in on the land, offering up a silly side story in which one of Elysium's founding fathers played by Alan Alda — who is seen trucking around the entire film on a Hoveround — has to try and remember where he placed the deed 40 years ago.
For the most part, the plot doesn't get too deep and you can see where it's going every step of the way, but the expectation with a film like this is to laugh, and that's where it runs into trouble. It's just not very funny. The laughter that comes out of all of this is limited to primarily sight gags, though, to be fair, there's a "wrapped in Reynolds" moment that made me laugh, primarily because it was so subtle I'm not even sure most of the audience members heard it. This example should help, however, in determining whether Wanderlust is for you. How do you like your comedy?
If you dig sight gags and the idea of a hoard of naked geriatrics running from an out of control Cadillac SUV in slow motion interests you, then by all means plunk down $13 and be my guest. However, if you also appreciate not-so-obvious comedy tossed in to appease the part of your brain that hopes the filmmakers put a little effort into the writing rather than just giving up and throwing a penis at the screen, then you may be in for a long 95 minutes.
Directed by David Wain, this film falls far from the tree his Role Models fell from. There's even a haphazardly way in which the film is edited together that makes me think entire plot threads were excised after too much test screening. Such as how Paul Rudd's character shows a growing annoyance with the Elysium crew throughout the film, then, as if a switch is flipped, he loses all composure and the film begins its downhill tumble toward the end.
Rudd is given little opportunity to be funny outside of a couple scenes such as what I will refer to here as the "mirror moment", but even this scene plays as if they just told Rudd to improvise for as long as he could and they'd see what they could use (it turns out they used too much). It ultimately felt like there was a lack of directorial control over story and situation and the film suffers for it.
You'll likely laugh while watching Wanderlust, I did, but it wasn't a genuinely funny experience. The comedy never felt fresh or unlike anything you could see in any number of similarly-themed hippie features. It would appear they lived by the motto that when things slowed down they'd throw a penis at the audience and hope they'll laugh. In short… try harder.
Links from Other Sites You May Like
Showing 4 Comments
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Add a New Comment |
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Besides it not being very good there seems to be growing irritation, on the imdb boards at least, aimed at Aniston for the way she is selling the movie to people by talking about how she's nude in the film when she isn't.
I like Paul Rudd, Malin Akerman and Justin Theroux and i'm fond of David Wain's work on Children's Hospital but i'm still not sure if I can be bothered with this one.
would u really go through a bad movie just to see aniston nude? if someone wants to see her nude, that's what google is for.
This is a F movie. I did not even stay to watch it all. I watched about 40min. and it felt like i wasted my life away. I was waiting for the movie to get better, but it got worst. Really, really bad choice for Jennifer A. C if generous i say F.
My friend and I hated this more than Brad did, and I'm a huge David Wain fan. The story is weak, Malin Akerman and Alan Alda play the only characters who aren't completely insufferable, and the "mirror moment" mentioned in the review is the only genuinely funny joke in the entire film.