<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now What are the Knights Templar Up To?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/now_what_are_the_knights_templar_up_to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/now_what_are_the_knights_templar_up_to/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:00:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: bradbrevet</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/now_what_are_the_knights_templar_up_to/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>bradbrevet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9417#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>Yeah, The Da Vinci Code passes as a movie because that book was basically written as a movie, which was something that also made me mad. It felt like Brown had no concern for writing a good book, he only wanted to sell a screenplay. Reading his earlier book almost proves it, considering it is much better developed. I think it was when they made the escape in Teabing&#039;s plane that I gave up on the book. It was WAY too many narrow escapes and coincidental outs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, The Da Vinci Code passes as a movie because that book was basically written as a movie, which was something that also made me mad. It felt like Brown had no concern for writing a good book, he only wanted to sell a screenplay. Reading his earlier book almost proves it, considering it is much better developed. I think it was when they made the escape in Teabing&#039;s plane that I gave up on the book. It was WAY too many narrow escapes and coincidental outs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewill55</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/now_what_are_the_knights_templar_up_to/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>thewill55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9417#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>Wow!  You really hated the Da Vinci Code didn&#039;t you?  While I kind of hated the endind, I thought the built was excellently written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  You really hated the Da Vinci Code didn&#039;t you?  While I kind of hated the endind, I thought the built was excellently written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-02-10 20:36:14 -->
