Movie Review: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian (2009)
The kids may enjoy it, but the laughs are limited
Photo: 20th Century Fox
The best way to describe Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian is to say it is harmless, but that doesn't necessarily make it good. Besides a couple of chuckles, this flick never inspires much laughter outside of a moment when Ben Stiller as Larry Daley kisses the reanimated version of Amelia Earhart and a youngster in my audience yelled out, "Ewwwwww!" Pretty rough when a 7-year-old (guessing) in the audience supplies the film's largest laugh.
The cast includes Ben Stiller, Amy Adams, Hank Azaria, Owen Wilson, Steve Coogan, Ricky Gervais, Ed Helms, Christopher Guest and Rami Malek. For more information on this film including pictures, trailers and a detailed synopsis choose from the following menu.
Review
"Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" is a 20th Century Fox release, directed by Shawn Levy and is rated PG for mild action and brief language.
Battle of the Smithsonian follows a select group of the exhibits, such as Jedediah Smith played by Owen Wilson, from the first film as they are boxed up for storage and shipped off to the National Archives at the Smithsonian. The catch is they will be going there without the magic tablet that brings them to life, but the monkey steals it and once they get to the Smithsonian all hell breaks loose as the 3,000 year-old Pharaoh Kah Mun Rah (Hank Azaria) comes to life and claims ownership of the tablet and his intent to rule the world by unleashing an army of birdmen. In the process he locks Larry's buddies up, but not before Jedediah gets a phone call in to Larry informing him of the situation.
The film follows the process of Larry impersonating his way into the Smithsonian and saving his friends. On the way he has a mini romance with Amelia Earhart (Amy Adams), talks to bobble-head Einsteins (Eugene Levy) and destroys a giant stained glass window along with damn near everything else. Of course, when exhibits impersonating historical figures come to life and start impersonating those figures and some of them use an inexplicable lisp I think we can pretty much throw logic and reason out the window.
So, we are left with entertainment value and whether or not this film brings any. As I pointed out early on, no, it really doesn't I am actually surprised I managed five paragraphs talking about it. I was told while leaving the theater by someone that had seen the first film the sequel wasn't as good, but I do expect families with young children to get a kick out of it — that is when the two leads aren't smooching — and won't be surprised if this one repeats with big dollars at the box-office. The film has pretty colors, loud noises and a little monkey. I mean, what more could a kid want from a film?
Showing 8 Comments
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Add a New CommentNOTE: The Facebook login option has been disabled. We apologize for any inconvenience. |
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines

The first movie wasn't all that bad…just completely unmemorable. Pretty much anyone over the age of 10 saw that movie and said "it was ok, could've been worse", but no one was ever really clamoring for a sequel. This'll do fine box-office wise (until it gets decimated by "Up" next week) but 8 months from now no one will remember this film.
I literally falling asleep during this film….
The good (I better start with it first):
- Amy Adams (so funny and so comical, somehow I love it!!!)
- Jonas Brothers as Cupid trio or the immitation of them as I recall (singing love songs, Titanic theme song, hillarious!!!)
THAT`s IT!!!!
The bad (oh i can go on and on):
- As much as they all hated the first one (critic), I loved it….. but this movie is unecessary
- I felt like dragged as I watched the entire film, feel sooooo long…….. (boring)
- Ben Stiller gives no more symphaty for me (as Larry Daley) compared to the first one
- A lot of unecessary character, stereotype!!!!
And on… and on…..
Just watch the movie, but don`t hope too high for this one….
Regards from Indonesia….
Buddy
This should've opened a week ago alongside Angels and Demons, it would've given it more room before "UP"
I hate the first movie. It annoyed the hell out of me (especially that f***in' monkey). As much as I love Amy Adams – and I love her a lot -, I won't be seeing this one. And hey, now there are two monkeys!!
What the original movie had was…originality. The back story was intriquing with Dick Van Dyke and Mickey Rooney (!) playing the retiring night watchmen. When the displays came to life it was slapstick comedy back in fine form. When some escaped the musieum, it was hilarious. Certainly it was best if you were seeing this with a youngster, admitedly. But this repeat has definitely lost the edge of originality. What it offers is bigger and more, not a well thought out idea for a sequel. The problem with slapstick like this is that is walks a fine line surrounded by stupidity and chaos. This one sounds like it fell off the line.
Extremely boring and not all living up to its name.
I think the movie was exactly what it needed to be. Light fluffy entertainment. Nothing wrong with that but nothing really in the movie to make it anything.
wats song was it when amelia and larry kissed?i mean there were like "me ad you" in the lyrics.?