Movie Review: I Love You, Man (2009)
It's got loads of laughs and loads of boredom
Photo: Paramount Pictures
I Love You, Man operates within serious highs and lows. When this movie is funny it's really funny, but when the jokes aren't rolling it hits rock bottom. This isn't necessarily a problem for the first half of the film or so, but there comes a point where you hope it will get out of its funk and gain a bit of consistency, but it never does. It's an R-rated comedy directed by John Hamburg who found some success with Along Came Polly back in 2004, but I just can't be sure if I Love You, Man will follow suit despite the caliber of comedic stars and its harder edged comedic tone.
The cast includes Paul Rudd, Jason Segel, Jaime Pressly, Jon Favreau, Aziz Ansari, Rashida Jones, Andy Samberg, J.K. Simmons, Jane Curtin, Matt Walsh and Nick Kroll. For more information on this film including pictures, trailers and a detailed synopsis choose from the following menu.
Review
"I Love You, Man" is a DreamWorks Pictures release, directed by John Hamburg and is rated R for pervasive language, including crude and sexual references.
Much like in Role Models, Rudd is more of the straight-laced character whereas the guy he befriends, Sydney (played by Forgetting Sarah Marshall's Jason Segel), is the crazier of the two, much like how Seann William Scott was the crazy guy in Role Models. The difference here being the two never find much of a cohesive friendship — despite the movie implying they have — and Rudd's character's tendency to be the ho-hum life of the party drags the film down between punch lines.
Jason Segel serves as the straight-forward attempt at getting the audience to laugh as every moment he is on screen is dedicated to getting you to chuckle at or with him. Segel's character, for all intents and purposes, sort of came off as a fraud to me and I fully expected that to be the film's turning point and when it wasn't there was a brief glimmer of hope, which was soon dashed when the alternative was just as boring as Peter.
However, contradicting Peter's disturbing life routine he is fortunate enough to be marrying someone as fantastic as Zooey. Rashida Jones is so cute, she seems almost too good to be true and she creates a character equally charming. Why Zooey would decide on such a dud as Peter is beyond me. Andy Samberg plays Peter's gay gym-trainer brother and is good for a few laughs as Samberg eats up each scene he is in and would have likely been a better character to focus on than the route this story went. The loud mouth couple played by Jamie Pressly and Jon Favreau is an excellent addition, but the joke there soon runs out as Hamburg goes to the well one too many times, something he seemed to do consistently throughout this film.
I Love You, Man isn't a bad film, it just isn't much of a good one. It has some extremely funny moments, most of the time dealing with scenes where both sexes are involved outside of the typical rude humor accessed when Rudd and Segel are sharing scenes alone. The film could have benefit severely by shaking things up and not relying on the same old tricks we have seen in other films of its ilk, and most notably making its lead character a little more accessible, something Judd Apatow films are best at and an easy way to distinguish this one from the Apatow filmography. Rudd's character is such a bore that by the time the film is over you are surprised anyone would have a dedicated interest in marrying him, let alone calling him a best friend after only a few months.
Showing 3 Comments
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Add a New CommentNOTE: The Facebook login option has been disabled. We apologize for any inconvenience. |
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines

Everyone's been calling this a "Bromance Comedy" can we please start calling it a "Dick Flick?"
That is the first time I heard the term "Dick Flick". I have to say I like it better than "Bromance Comedy" so I'll help out and start using the term. Go team!
7.5/10
I agree with a lot of what you said, Brad. The first half was much funnier than the second in my opinion. At about the halfway mark (perhaps a little later) it turned sort of boring and cliche with only a few laughable moments. In the first half, however, me and my friends had a lot of good laughs, particularily at Danny's awkwardness. "Jobin" and "Totes Magotes".
The acting was what made the film what it was. Without the hilarious performances from Paul Rudd and Jason Segel it would be just another bromance, but they elevate the film to heights it should by all means not be capable of.
It's a mild dissapointment, but still funnier than most films in theatres. I'd suggest seeing it on a cheap night.
P.S. I doubt women would like this. This is a movie for guys to see with their other guy friends. Obviously.