Movie Review: Don't be Afraid of the Dark (2011)
I thought it was supposed to be scary
Photo: FilmDistrict
On the outside it appeared Don't be Afraid of the Dark was going to be one of those "chill you to the bone" kind of thrillers that doesn't need to rely on jump scares to keep the tension high, but rather the story itself is creepy enough to keep you on edge. Unfortunately, director Troy Nixey's attempts at atmospheric tension falls flat as he relies too heavily on traditional horror movie scares and the always-dark setting of a Gothic mansion as if we've never seen a haunted house before. I don't know about you, but the creepier some places look, the less likely I am to believe anyone would hang out there, let alone the idea of a small child talking to whatever creatures may be whispering her name from the black hole in the basement
The cast includes Guy Pearce, Katie Holmes and Bailee Madison. For more information on this film including pictures, trailers and a detailed synopsis choose from the following menu.
Review
"Don't be Afraid of the Dark" is a FilmDistrict release, directed by Troy Nixey and is rated R for violence and terror. The running time is 1 hour 40 minutes.
The setting for Don't be Afraid of the Dark is Blackwood Manor, a dark, sprawling and overgrown estate where architect Alex Hurst (Guy Pearce) and his new girlfriend Kim (Katie Holmes) aim to restore the place and turn it over for a pretty penny. Coming to stay with Alex while the work is being done is his young daughter Sally (Bailee Madison) who's been handed off by her mother and comes second to her workaholic father. Detached and looking for anything to show her some attention, Sally is drawn to whispers from the basement where an old furnace has been bolted shut following the events that kick off the film.
These little deviants are afraid of the light (or it hurts them, I couldn't quite tell) and as luck would have it for any horror director, they do most of their evil deeds at night. Sally has removed the grate that locked them in their dungeon and now they want to take her down into the darkness with them.
The script, written by del Toro and Matthew Robbins (Mimic), is based on the 1973 telefilm of the same name. This new version adds the little girl to the story whereas the original only featured a married couple with the wife becoming the tormented member of the family. The child-in-danger addition is just one of the several examples from the film where we feel we are treading old territory, and it's been done so much better in the past.
Then you get to the questions you'll be asking yourself as you watch. Questions such as, Why didn't she just turn on the bathroom light? What about the demon smashed in the bookcase? Why didn't they look at all of the pictures? And this isn't me nit-picking, these are general queries I would think any reasonable person would have while watching this film. A film is scarier when the audience is exploring the opportunities for escape and can't logically find any. Here, the holes are gaping.
When a film forgets to answer the questions any reasonable audience member would ask, that audience member loses any sense of reality the film may have built and anything that may have been frightening about a scene just goes away. That is exactly how I felt while watching this movie.
As for the talent involved, Madison seemed to have issues creating a little girl that was neglected by her mother and ignored by her father. She came off as more of a princess than an ill-treated child. Pearce is equally unaffecting as he, at first, seems like a caring father, but as soon as his just-arrived daughter gives him the cold shoulder he pretty much passes on all fatherly duties.
This is where Katie Holmes comes in, the surprisingly best part of the film as she must balance the duties of the girlfriend Sally is uninterested in as well as show true signs of motherly care once she realizes the danger Sally is in. Holmes is convincing and it made me believe even further that del Toro and Robbins shouldn't have abandoned the original teleplay and just centered the story on a married couple rather than a tormented young child. Then again, films about paranoid protagonists and the people that don't believe them typically wear thin no matter who's involved.
Don't be Afraid of the Dark wasn't an absolute bust, but it definitely was a major disappointment. The lack of scares and increasing frustration with the plot had me walking away shrugging my shoulders wishing things had turned out better.
Links from Other Sites You May Like
Showing 2 Comments
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Add a New Comment |
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
I was really disappointed with this one. Im beginning to wonder if the whole rating thing(the MPAA giving it an R for being "too scary") was a bunch of BS, and just publicity …because it wasnt very scary at all, and certainly didnt deserve the R rating. I was really hoping to be scared, and while there was some decent atmosphere, it just didnt deliver.
Sounds like the little monsters are almost exactly the same as the ones in the original version. I saw that one when I was a child, and thought it was really scary. I'm sure if I watched it now, I would roll my eyes. Thx for the review — I'll wait for dvd.