Comments on: Movie Review: 2012 (2009)

By: marcus

marcus — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:04:30 +0000

Thanks for webonlinemovies.com

for making me to see this great movie

By: rahul

rahul — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:03:12 +0000

its really a great movie

u can watch this movie online for free at

http://www.webonlinemovies.com

By: Malcolm

Malcolm — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:07:56 +0000

I agree with a C for some of the film, however, it takes an A+ for visual spectacle. Once again 'the critic' seems unable to see a film for what it is, over the top entertainment, nothing more. Many of us humans like this type of film! Have you not figured that out yet?
I defy anyone not to be blown away by the spectacle that Roland has given us.

Overall a B- is more like it.
Go see it people…

By: zyzygy

zyzygy — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:29:23 +0000

Saw it Friday, loved it for the ride it was meant to be, could have shown a better ending though(not bad, just needed something extra).

By: Ani

Ani — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:05:02 +0000

I just saw the movie, now I seriously don't agree w what was said before, u see not everyone goes to the movies on a schedule, I loved the fact, that I cried, laughed and was kept in the tip of my seat! Many unspected things happend and I think the character Adrian was very interesting and the day after tomorrow was another awesome movie… now I believe this movie should open the mind of many ppl! Make them question our goverment, set out to find out more about our planet, bc if u guys aint noticed, just like the movie, out planet is not doing too well! And is not how the movie was done, how long the movie was or the actors in the movie is about the statement behind it, if not then u might need to watch that movie Al Gore made about out planet…it might be old but it opens our eyes to how we are not taking care of our planet!!! By the way recycle and save energy!!

By: Seiko

Seiko — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:05:36 +0000

I hope where not talking about that boring, bad movie "The Perfect Storm." The most ovverrated movie of all time.
Day After Tomorrow was great, Independence Day is still one of the best movies ever made, Godzilla should'nt have been called Godzilla but otherwise it was awesome.
I don't think this movie will be nearly as good as any of those, but I think perhaps it would work for the last hour or so to be slower paced, perhaps a situation of "after the destruction." Now I haven't seen it, but I think it's worked for other movies, like one (can't remember the name) where nukes are blown up all over the U.S. and then what follows is an "after the disaster part."

By: Tristan

Tristan — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:27:44 +0000

I absolutely agree – why can't he just bring in a proper screenwriter? Does he honestly think that the characters he creates are interesting, viable human beings that people will actually root for? Because they aren't.

By: The Check Spot

The Check Spot — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:04:39 +0000

I didn't hate it. Which I guess is a positive review. But you are right, he falls into the same mistake he made on Day After Tormorrow, where he blew his effects load way too early. However, he did attempt to make a larger picture of what humanity is, which I admire. If Michael Bay had been involved, it would've been all destruction, and I like that Roland took some time out to discuss the moral implications of the end of the world. Though, he may have gone on a bit too long about it. I think the running time is what makes the movie suffer. The final moments played like a "what else could go wrong" sequence on that ship. If Roland only tightened the film up a bit he could've had a great film. I guess your right about handing the reins to another screenwriter. That limo scene is pretty awesome as well. Overall, I liked it better than Godzilla and The Day After Tomorrow, but not as much as I liked Independence Day.

By: connor

connor — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:20:29 +0000

seein it tonight looks pretty sick.