<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Bay and I Agree On Something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/michael-bay-and-i-agree-on-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/michael-bay-and-i-agree-on-something/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:47:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: anti_cool</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/michael-bay-and-i-agree-on-something/#comment-15133</link>
		<dc:creator>anti_cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=15273#comment-15133</guid>
		<description>If anyone saw Coraline they would know that 3-d effects can really enhance the visual quality of a movie, which also makes your point about pop-up books ridiculous.    Film is a visual medium, unlike books, and to improve the possibilities of the visual experience should only be looked at as something beneficial to the art.   Furthermore, I will take the opinion of someone like Ridley Scott, whose work I not only admire more but who actually has seen part of Avatar, over the uninformed and, from the sound of it, soon-to-change opinion of Michael Bay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone saw Coraline they would know that 3-d effects can really enhance the visual quality of a movie, which also makes your point about pop-up books ridiculous.    Film is a visual medium, unlike books, and to improve the possibilities of the visual experience should only be looked at as something beneficial to the art.   Furthermore, I will take the opinion of someone like Ridley Scott, whose work I not only admire more but who actually has seen part of Avatar, over the uninformed and, from the sound of it, soon-to-change opinion of Michael Bay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dorey</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/michael-bay-and-i-agree-on-something/#comment-15124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dorey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=15273#comment-15124</guid>
		<description>First of all, it was not his acceptance speech - it was the reporters scrum before the awards banquet. I should know - I asked him the 3D questions.

Bay, like so many others is simply leaving the door open until AVATAR comes out becomes they are afraid to make a commitment one way or the other - same goes for movie bloggers quoting the same lame excuse. MvA is technically magnificent when looking at the 3D in particular. To say you have to say for AVATAR is a cop out and most people know it after seeing MvA.

Bay was smiling when he said he thought it was a gimmick because he knows it causes a reaction in 3D fans. Oh he will be doing 3D someday - mark my words. And it could even be Transformers 3.

Bay obviously hasn&#039;t researched modern 3D as there ARE cameras that can capture his &quot;aggressive&quot; scenes. Too bad he doesnt seek out Cameron NOW like Spielberg, Jackson, Soderbergh and Ridley Scott have done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, it was not his acceptance speech &#8211; it was the reporters scrum before the awards banquet. I should know &#8211; I asked him the 3D questions.</p>
<p>Bay, like so many others is simply leaving the door open until AVATAR comes out becomes they are afraid to make a commitment one way or the other &#8211; same goes for movie bloggers quoting the same lame excuse. MvA is technically magnificent when looking at the 3D in particular. To say you have to say for AVATAR is a cop out and most people know it after seeing MvA.</p>
<p>Bay was smiling when he said he thought it was a gimmick because he knows it causes a reaction in 3D fans. Oh he will be doing 3D someday &#8211; mark my words. And it could even be Transformers 3.</p>
<p>Bay obviously hasn&#039;t researched modern 3D as there ARE cameras that can capture his &#034;aggressive&#034; scenes. Too bad he doesnt seek out Cameron NOW like Spielberg, Jackson, Soderbergh and Ridley Scott have done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/michael-bay-and-i-agree-on-something/#comment-15081</link>
		<dc:creator>ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=15273#comment-15081</guid>
		<description>...lemme just say that I totally agree that 3-D is a gimmick/shallow/excuse to print money, etc.  Just wanted to throw another ridiculous idea out there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;lemme just say that I totally agree that 3-D is a gimmick/shallow/excuse to print money, etc.  Just wanted to throw another ridiculous idea out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/michael-bay-and-i-agree-on-something/#comment-15080</link>
		<dc:creator>ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=15273#comment-15080</guid>
		<description>Crazy idea: how about 3-D contact lenses?!  Yes, they would be ridiculously cost prohibitive and boy what a fuckin&#039; migraine... but if the studios are contemplating personalized boutique glasses, they should try to work that in somewhere into their business plan.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy idea: how about 3-D contact lenses?!  Yes, they would be ridiculously cost prohibitive and boy what a fuckin&#039; migraine&#8230; but if the studios are contemplating personalized boutique glasses, they should try to work that in somewhere into their business plan.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/michael-bay-and-i-agree-on-something/#comment-15042</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=15273#comment-15042</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with this article. Even down to the part about leaving the door open for Cameron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with this article. Even down to the part about leaving the door open for Cameron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-02-10 18:55:51 -->
