Comments on: Latest MPAA Ratings: BULLETIN NO: 2095

By: Justin Casey

Justin Casey — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:30:39 +0000

now that takers doesn't come till may (the week after iron man 2) i have no doubt in my mind it will bomb against iron man 2

By: Matt

Matt — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:40:08 +0000

Chill out, people. I agree with Vince. Peace.

Takers should be one of the worst of 2010. Armored looks like a potential rental, maybe. I saw the TV spots on Adult Swim, and they were decent enough.

By: Vince

Vince — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:43:42 +0000

@Vince: Speaking of which, how the hell are they gonna promote that movie? T.I.'s in jail, Chris Brown is now forever seen as a woman-beater, and "Armored" looks like the same exact thing, except actually somewhat decent. Plus Takers is only coming out like a month after Armored does. But what do I know? When has anything coming from Screen Gems been seen as a good idea?

By: Vince

Vince — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:41:18 +0000

Calm down everyone. You're fighting over Takers.

By: AJ

AJ — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:43:47 +0000

@Raheem: of course those 4 are gonna be r they already have graphic red band trailers or were all ready rated takers seemed like it could of been both since it doesnt have a red band and seemed more action then violence

By: Raheem

Raheem — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:33:02 +0000

@Eli you don't even know what I was talking about and those 4 R Rated Film I was talking about were Daybreakers, The Book Of Eli, Legion And Edge Of Darkness. And he will see both of those film in Jan so you are wasting you time agreeing with him JACKASS

By: Raheem

Raheem — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:26:17 +0000

@Eli: The Only Thing Pointless Is your comments

By: Jakob

Jakob — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:21:02 +0000

Huh, kinda lookin forward to that Midgets Vs. Mascots movie. sounds interesting! LOL

By: Eli

Eli — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:03:54 +0000

@Raheem: By that logic, that makes your comment equally, if not more pointless. It's not like anyone would bother to find out if they SHOT Takers as a PG-13. The studio has nothing to do with it, they change up the PG-13/R line-up on a film-by-film basis usually. Nor do those 4 rated-R films, what if he has no interest in them. I completely agree with him, Takers would have sounded more promising and appealing with an R rating. Now it's been relegated to descriptions like "a sexual situation/partial nudity" when it could have been more of a gritty heist flick (even saying that is giving it too much credit).

By: Raheem

Raheem — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:41:53 +0000

-BR Number One: Takers Was made as a PG-13 Film and was going to comeout as a PG-13 Film
Number Two: Takers Comes From the Same Studio (Sony Screen Gems) That has another Heist theme movie Armored which is also Rated PG-13 and hits theaters next month on Dec 4th
And Number Three there are Four R Rated films coming Out in January And a few in February.

So my point is if you are not going to see Takers On Feb 26th then you shouldn't have made a comment about it

By: BR

BR — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:05:18 +0000

I was definitely expecting an R rating for Takers. Im a little less excited now about it, and I was barely excited in the first place

By: EnglishGavz

EnglishGavz — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:43:52 +0000

It's not unheard of for big films like Avatar to not be rated till weaks before release. I have a friend at the BBFC who didn't rate Transformers 2 till about a week before its release.

By: AJ

AJ — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:35:33 +0000

@justin casey: yeaH I THought myself it wuld of been rated today takers i thought was gonna get an r tho huh

By: justin casey

justin casey — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:32:26 +0000

after all that news about a terrible trailer yesterday avatar still isn't rated that's weird