'Immortals' Review (2011)
Style over substance, but entertaining nevertheless
Photo: Relativity Media
Tarsem Singh's Immortals doesn't fit into the boxy constraints of a studio blockbuster, even though it rages with all the warring gods and carnage you could want from a studio-housed, blood thirsty Greek epic. But combine that with the minimalistic and colorfully designed production and artistic flair you get from a Tarsem Singh film and the result is a feature more suitably aimed at a smaller, more niche audience.
And as much as I enjoyed it, I will admit the story isn't nearly as ambitious or inventive as Singh's The Fall or even his debut feature, The Cell. Yet, the imagination in its execution is evident, mostly in how Singh and his production design team bring to life a new story of ancient Greece with a style all its own.
The cast includes Henry Cavill, Freida Pinto, Kellan Lutz, Mickey Rourke, Stephen Dorff, Luke Evans, John Hurt, Isabel Lucas, Daniel Sharman, Stephen McHattie, Peter Stebbings and Steve Byers. For more information on this film including pictures, trailers and a detailed synopsis choose from the following menu.
Review
"Immortals" is a Relativity Media release, directed by Tarsem Singh and is rated R for sequences of strong bloody violence, and a scene of sexuality. The running time is 1 hour 50 minutes.
As Theseus soon learns his role in all of this he's joined by the virgin oracle Phaedra (Freida Pinto) and the thief Stavros (Stephen Dorff), a couple of characters whose sole existence would appear to be more as plot devices rather than fleshed out additions to the cast. Stavros gives Theseus someone to bounce ideas off and proves to be a good battle buddy, and Phaedra serves as a foreshadowing storyteller in the early goings only to become a rather weak love interest in the film's latter half. This includes a 3D moment that had one member of my audience blurt out, "Whoa!"
Looking down on events as they play out are the Gods from their cloudy confines on Mount Olympus. Zeus (Luke Evans), Athena (Isabel Lucas), Poseidon (Kellan Lutz) and Ares (Daniel Sharman) argue over how involved they should get in the human affairs as the film does evoke a clever example of how having religious faith can and will help you in your greatest time of need, even if it seems the Gods aren't ever listening. Whether this was a goal of the screenplay I don't know, but it's definitely in there.
With the Gods scantily clad and adorned in gold, Singh has done an excellent job separating the mighty atop Mount Olympus from the mortals in the trenches on Earth. It's up here where they argue and decide on how, and whether or not, they will help humans before Hyperion's power becomes so great not even they can stop him. And even though the film's marketing would lead you to believe the Gods merely walk around and wage battle in silly headgear, it's all a matter of context as none of Eiko Ishioka's costumes appear out of place at any particular moment.
Yes, there are moments that echo previous films. A lengthy attack sequence from Theseus on Hyperion's men is reminiscent of a similar scene pulled off by Gerard Butler in 300 and a quartet of arrows fired at once brings memories of a similar scene in House of Flying Daggers. The comparisons, however, don't limit the enjoyment and they're hardly abundant. Where my attention was predominantly drawn was to the impressive visuals, stark landscapes and bludgeoning effects. There's no doubt Immortals is style over substance, but I found myself drinking that substance up at every turn and enjoying every drop.
Fight scenes aren't merely swords hitting shields or even swords piercing skin in bloody CG bursts, though that is all there. Once the Gods find it worth their time to throw their hat into the ring, chains, tridents, spears, hammers and whatever else may be lying around becomes an instrument of destruction. Yes, I relished in exploding heads that numbered too many to count, split torsos and bodies slammed into concrete to the point they burst as golden gods lay waste to combatants that prove more challenging than they'd ever assumed.
Add to that the visuals. Envision an inky black tidal wave enveloping our heroes only to have the following scene feature Phaedra, dressed in red against the black landscape. Add Singh's striking vision of the Titans imprisoned in a stone box windowed by gold bars and the architecture of a lone water hole in the middle of nowhere. It's almost as if these scenes were written merely for the visuals, which only makes me more interested in how Singh's mind works when he first reads a script. My only complaint would be the full CG horizons, which always look too perfect to be real especially when they accompany the minimalistic nature of the sets, which can be a bit distracting when taking in the complete picture.
As far as the acting and dialogue goes, it's hardly poetic, but it's serviceable. Cavill is fine as Theseus and at times commanding, Dorff adds brief moments of comic relief and Pinto is, more often than not, expected to look pretty rather than say too much, which proves to be a good choice when compared to films such as Miral and You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger. The Gods, though, did surprise me. Based on the images I'd seen I hardly expected them to be as dominating as they were. They stand tall and appear strong, leading you to believe in their power especially when compared to the portrait of the Gods painted in last year's Clash of the Titans. There is absolutely no comparison.
What I'm happiest about, though, is that I never gave up on this movie. Immortals was one of my most anticipated films heading into this year, but negative buzz, a horrible marketing campaign and the studio hiding the film from critics until the last minute (I had to ask about a screening, there was never a formal invite) had me concerned. Yet, my faith in Tarsem Singh and especially my love and appreciation for his last film, The Fall, kept my hopes high.
That said, any fan of Singh's work should find enjoyment in this film and it may usher in a new following, though I am concerned for its commercial prospects. Immortals is an impossible film to market as any attempt will have people seeing it as a silly mashup of 300 and Clash of the Titans, both being unfair comparisons if you ask me.
Immortals is much more than a cheap knock-off of two mediocre (at best) films. It's a Tarsem Singh film, a statement that's come to mean a lot to me. And while this may be one instance where Singh's art outweighs his story, it sure does look good doing it and I enjoyed almost every minute of it.
Links from Other Sites You May Like
Showing 25 Comments
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Add a New Comment |
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines

Brad I really don't understand why you seem to be such a fan of Singh's work. He's certainly not great…
Brad, I'm a little confused. I thought you gave 300 a B? So wouldn't a mediocre score be like a C or C+?
I'll be looking at the ads next week to see if any of your review will show up in TV, Brad. Not sure if any other review will be as kind as you.
I'm right with you Brad, this feature is more suitably aimed at a smaller, more niche audience. I loved it!
I'm purely going by other reviews, the RT score and the horrible marketing campaign but i have zero interest in this.
So, Freida (who's always so gorgeous) is limited again? WOW, i've seen all 4 of her movies, will see this tonight and she has some talent, I saw some of it in Miral. She did ACTED in Miral, Brad. And she did a fine job, her best work to date so far though it won't WOW you but it's the most she's ever done and did a fine job. I don't know why she's always limited, give her a shot, I saw something in Miral.
Anyways, I like the review and I was already sold by the trailers anyways. I usually don't listen to critics on movies i want to see so again, i'll be seeing this tonight.
She was definitely given a lot more to do than Dorff, who, bar a couple of scenes, was blink and miss throughout the film. Still, a rather enjoyable film. Looking forward to Tarsem's take on Snow White this March and Cavill donning the red cape in the Man of Steel.
Have you considered that maybe they didn't show critic screenings so your expectations would be very low then you'd be pleasantly surprised and write a much nicer review than you would have otherwise?
As someone who enjoys ancient tales and mythology immensely and who mostly seeks out visually strong films, I'm glad that Tarsem took the path that you're describing Brad.
As in 300, those who want historical accuracies and realistic depictions, can always imagine their own versions after reading the documents relating to the events, while Singh's spectacle is more akin to what ancient Romans would have enjoyed at the Colosseum.
How much are they paying you for this one BB?
- I Tells It Like It is
I hope your joking. I have seen movie ads on this website of movies he hates.
I felt like it could've been alittle longer of a film… I feel like they rushed the first half of the movie and really went into detail more into the second half. Good movie though.
A little too high considering everything you said…but no worries, when a movie I like gets bashed by other critics, I usually give high grades too.
Brad-Did you see it in 3-D? If so, how was it?
Other than that "ooh" moment, that is…
wow its funny, when Brad gives a C or a C+ to supposed "good movies" some commenters go crazy and say he's just being a critic and cant appreciate a movie for what it is, fun and now when he clearly does and gives a supposed "bad" film or a film with no depth or strong script a good review people say he's getting paid off?? some people!
I saw it and it's great…. The film was in good pace, the design was just wonderful and the effects were all looked great (the tidal wave, the gods fight, etc)…
It's like a guilty pleasure (Just like Real Steel) for me this year…
Watching Henry Cavill makes me wonder how he would be Superman next year…. (In a good way)…
Luke evans, isabel lucas en every actor acted really well… Best acting from the movie came from Mickey Rourke…
Watch it and see it yourself.
Regards from Indonesia
I just saw Immortals last night. I personally enjoyed it, though there were some moments that made me scoff. One guy beside me muttered, "Awkward…" when a certain priestess empties water into the mouth of a certain warrior. The entire audience could be heard snickering. But other than that, there were no other moments of audience tittering. It was visually appealing. Cavill and Rourke do very well. That inspiration speech from the previews was not as bad as I thought it was going to be. And I really liked the interpretation of the gods, especially Zeus by Luke Evans. I'm glad I went to see it.
Yeah, that speech is one of many things that is much better when seen in context isn't it. I personally just think it's an impossible film to market since these kinds of films have a built in expectation and the trailers went against that and it must simply be seen as a completed film.
Brad, I agreed with your review and your comment above. I hated that speech in the trailer but in the movie it played much better. I actually think the RT reviews are far too harsh. You should post your review on Rotten Tomatoes. In Tarsem we trust!
Glad to hear you enjoyed this Brad. I like that you appreciated the film for what it is, not what others expect it to be. I'm curious about Rourke and Cavill so I may try to catch it next week in 2-D.
This review nailed everything I felt about Singh, his previous work, my lowered expectations for the movie, and my pleasant surprise when I finally saw it.
What irks me most about the critics' reviews is that many seem to have decided long ago that Singh is all style and no substance. The Fall is so full of substance I just don't know what people wanted or expected from that film. As someone else wrote, and I'm not giving much away here, it is one of the most passionate arguments against suicide ever.
Saw this tonight… loved it. Singh's style is more than enough for me. I appreciate the stark, vivid contrasts he seems to enjoy so much & the story kept me interested. I completely agree with this assessment Brad. A solid B+ in my book too.
IMMORTALS was just voted one of the top ten films of the year by Toro Magazine. Glad someone had the just to do what is right. http://www.toromagazine.com/culture/film/be5a75fd-3b49-1ab4-89eb-8c6eda6877b5/The-Best-Films-of-2011-/
I am surprised that no one mentioned how dark the scenes were. I rented a dvd, not blue ray, and found most scenes very difficult to see clearly, I even lightened my screen as much as possible, and this did not help. Am I the only one who feels this movie was just too dark?? Did I rent a bad dvd??