<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Want to See &#039;Star Trek&#039; Too!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/i_want_to_see_star_trek_too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/i_want_to_see_star_trek_too/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:32:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJDevil418</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/i_want_to_see_star_trek_too/#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>NJDevil418</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10088#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking forward to this almost as much as I was looking forward to the new Star Wars movies and Indy 4...luckily this has nothing to do with George Lucas (except ILM...damn) so I might not be disappointed as immensely as those instances.

A new series would be spectacular. But unfortunately Enterprise, which I happened to like and I thought was a step in the right direction as far as time period setting, and its poor ratings put the kibosh on that for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m looking forward to this almost as much as I was looking forward to the new Star Wars movies and Indy 4&#8230;luckily this has nothing to do with George Lucas (except ILM&#8230;damn) so I might not be disappointed as immensely as those instances.</p>
<p>A new series would be spectacular. But unfortunately Enterprise, which I happened to like and I thought was a step in the right direction as far as time period setting, and its poor ratings put the kibosh on that for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaTTleR_NL</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/i_want_to_see_star_trek_too/#comment-2794</link>
		<dc:creator>RaTTleR_NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10088#comment-2794</guid>
		<description>I find this such a shame.
The Star Trek universe is big and rich enough to come up with something new, why go the prequel way?
I&#039;m more hoping for a new series that follows up voyager timewise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this such a shame.<br />
The Star Trek universe is big and rich enough to come up with something new, why go the prequel way?<br />
I&#039;m more hoping for a new series that follows up voyager timewise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-05-25 09:09:34 -->
