'G.I. Joe: Retaliation' (2013) Movie Review

G.I. Joe Retaliation movie review
Ray Park and Dwayne Johnson in G.I. Joe: Retaliation
Photo: Paramount Pictures

Of the few defenders of 2009's G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, many liked to say it took them back to their childhood. In my mind that means they were taken back to the days of Osh-Kosh B'Gosh and when eating anything off the ground seemed plausible. By comparison, G.I. Joe: Retaliation will also take you back to your childhood, though instead of the terrible twos, director Jon Chu and screenwriters Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick -- the duo responsible for Zombieland -- have delivered something the 10-12 year-old audience is sure to appreciate while the rest of us look on, not entirely bored, but enough to the point where I was left thinking, close, but still needs work.

G.I. Joe: Retaliation
Grade: C

G.I. Joe: Retaliation"G.I. Joe: Retaliation" is a Paramount Pictures release, directed by Jon Chu and is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of combat violence and martial arts action throughout, and for brief sensuality and language.

The cast includes Channing Tatum, Dwayne Johnson, Ray Park, Byung-hun Lee, Elodie Yung, RZA, D.J. Cotrona, Adrianne Palicki, Ray Stevenson, Joe Mazzello, Bruce Willis, Walt Goggins, DeRay Davis, Luke Bracey and Matt Gerald.

G.I. Joe: Retaliation is far less juvenile than its predecessor even though it still plays in the realm of a franchise most commonly known to most as a cartoon and plastic action figures. In fact, I'd say this installment is far more true to the spirit of the G.I. Joe I grew up with and remember, but perhaps that's why it ultimately began to wear on me as much as it did. After all, I stopped playing in that sandbox a long time ago.

The story revolves around the idea a criminal syndicate has infiltrated the U.S. government, kidnapped the President and has been running the country via an impersonator with the goal of destroying every major country in the world. It's a rather grand proposition. However, despite the epic description, G.J. Joe begins to feel small and disjointed. As much as the idea of a military team of soldiers fighting alongside age-old ninja warriors may appeal to our juvenile sensibilities, when it comes to telling the story in a live-action setting the storytellers must decide whether they are going to go for realism or absolute simplicity to bring this mish-mash of ideas together. On one hand you lose your young audience, on the other adults are going to begin to raise their eyebrows.

This "mish-mash", however, is part of the appeal. But when you serve so many masters at once in hope of giving audiences everything they desire from an action film things tend to get lost along the way. As a result, Retaliation has just about as much to like as it does to shrug your shoulders and wish they had taken things a little more seriously.

While the majority of the characters work, the casting of RZA as the Blind Master to the film's ninja characters -- Storm Shadow (Byung-hun Lee), Snake Eyes (Ray Park) and Jinx (Elodie Yung) -- is a bit embarrassing. The guy is not an actor and the whole of my audience laughed whenever he spoke. Of course, it doesn't help his character's whole reason for being is to point something out to Storm Shadow one of the four-year-olds that loved the first film would have figured out years ago, but I digress.

Like I said, the majority of the talent is solid and the majority are newcomers. Dwayne Johnson, D.J. Cotrona, Adrianne Palicki, Ray Stevenson and Bruce Willis work within the film's adolescent surroundings.

One of the joys for me was Walton Goggins in a limited role as the warden of a secret prison. The joy he takes in his job is only elevated due to Goggins' ability to be that guy. Between this, Lincoln and Django Unchained, Goggins has proved to be a valuable go-to character actor that will hopefully continue to get more screen time.

On the crafts side, the visual effects and stunt work are great, even if scene-after-scene of hand-to-hand combat can get a bit tiresome, especially in moments where the characters decide to blow away their opponents in the end. Can anyone explain to me why someone would choose to have a punching match and take blow after blow only to blow up their opponent in the aftermath of their victory? Seems a bit risky to me and I have to believe everyone, at this point, has seen Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Additionally, Henry Jackman tried his best to provide an epic score, but for the most part it felt empty, generic and probably the weakest contribution from the behind-the-scenes crew.

The most promising aspect of G.I. Joe: Retaliation is that if this the kind of leap in quality we can expect from the first to the second, perhaps a third will prove wholly tolerable. This is in no way a suggestion you should run out to see this film, but if you do decide to go, you should now be prepared for what's to come.


More Movie Reviews

'Straight Outta Compton' (2015) Movie ReviewB-

Straight Outta Compton (2015)

'Mistress America' (2015) Movie ReviewB+

Mistress America (2015)

'The Man from U.N.C.L.E.' (2015) Movie ReviewB

The Man From U.N.C.L.E. (2015)

'Cop Car' (2015) Movie ReviewB-

Cop Car (2015)

More Reviews
  • Seiko

    This is all good news. I never expected a G.I. Joe film that would essentially be "Zero Dark Thirty" but your right, the first one didn't even seem ready for people over 8 to enjoy. From the trailers and just the general look and feel of it, this one looked like it'd be geared towards a real audience, even if the goal is kids 10-12 (let's face it, most things are, and especially were b4 the days of Nolan).

  • Good Grief

    I'm glad you pointed out the "Rza is not an actor" thing, Brad. Not only was "The Man with the Iron Fists" the single worst film of 2012 but Rza's performance was the worst of the year as well.
    It seems his connection to the kung fu genre allows him to get these pseudo martial artist roles. It needs to stop.

    I'm actually glad you gave the film a 'C' though, as I was expecting you to tear it apart. It is a GI Joe movie after all.
    I'll probably give it a go this weekend at some point as it seems I might get some kind of nostalgic joy out of it.

  • Torryz

    Brad, how was the 3-D?

  • http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/profile/Xarnis/ Xarnis

    My 13 year old-nephew wants to see this, so I might end up seeing this over the weekend. I'm not hoping for much.

  • https://twitter.com/TooMuchHamza Hamza Zain

    No mention of C-Tates? HOW WILL YOU GET THEM CLICKS, BRAD?!

    • http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/profile/Jake17/ Jake17

      Don't worry, he'll be getting them clicks from plenty of Twilight lovers with The Host review. Plenty of #GoodComments as well.

  • http://www.twitter.com/marlonwallace marlonwallace

    No mention of Channing Tatum... I'm guessing reports of his death AREN'T exaggerated.

  • Dan

    Goggins is the man! My personal favorite television actor of all-time just from The Shield and Justified. Would love to see him blow up in theatrical movies, but gotta love him going from indies, to big name filmmakers, to straight franchise projects. Guy's a real actor.

  • http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/profile/Ryguy815/ Ryguy815

    Hey Brad, just wondering, when can we be expecting your review of The Host?

  • http://Youtube.com/sandovaldrew Drew Sandoval

    Went to see the movie last night... Pretty spot on review... But you failed to mention the terrific snowy mountain scene and the the hilarious perf Jonathan Pryce gives as the evil prez. I just wish those bits were in a better movie.

  • http://timeforafilm.com Alex Thomas

    I haven't seen the first but thought this was really bad (D+ bad). There were some ok moments I guess, film overall was just so loud yet boring, I was surprised at how a film with so much action could be so dull.

  • http://letterboxd.com/gman/ G-Man

    Nice review, Brad. That's a great call on Goggins!

  • Bishop

    I just watched this last Friday and I prepared myself for some bad midnless movie to be entertained as an escape. I wasn't prepared enough but yet I still enjoyed a bit for laughing on some scenes, such as the bad dialogue between duke and roadblock's character build up. Also the scenes with vehicles battling, clearly it was an advertisements for toys.

    I did enjoy the fight scenes with snake eyes vs storm shadow as well as the battle in the mountain. That was the highlight of the movie. I did admire that this time around it did not feel like too over the top sci fi with there weapons like the first. There are plenty of bad decision that they'd did with this film, I think if they brought Dennis Quid back instead of Bruce Willis it would be tolerable. Willis was a cash name as well as The Rock but The Rock killed some ass which is a up side of the film as well.

    Overall this movie still end up bad and a props to a fixing they did from the first which is not an easy task. What else can you expect from a movie based on a toy?