Getting Twisted with David Lynch's 'Blue Velvet'
Man, Lynch is too much for me to deal with...
Photo: MGM Home Video
I just don't think I am much of a Lynchian. David Lynch is obviously working on a level unlike 99.9999% of the directors out there and there appears to be only a couple of ways of looking at a Lynch film. You can absorb Lynch to the point you become immersed in the world(s) he creates in his films. You can search for meaning and you can spend a long time doing so. You can also watch 15 minutes of a Lynch film and give up on it before you even get into the darkness he sets out to create.
In 2001 I watched Mulholland Drive and I enjoyed dissecting that at the time, but for the life of me I can't remember any of the conclusions I came to. I tried watching Lost Highway and failed, after all my only interest in the film was the Smashing Pumpkins song "Eye" that was on the soundtrack. That song still kicks all kinds of ass.
Blue Velvet is my third Lynch film even though I have Dune sitting on the shelf in HD DVD format and just haven't taken the time to watch it, primarily because I know the investment needed to watch a Lynch film and finding that kind of time is rare for me recently.
Typically when I watch a film I have not seen I let it soak in and write it a day, week, two weeks or so later. With Blue Velvet I knew it was either "write it now" or "fuck it". I have to get my thoughts on this one out now or they will just ruminate, fester and die. I am a fan of dark and twisted films, but a Lynch film is well beyond your average dark and twisted, he actually brings substance to the film and makes an audience work. Who woulda thunk?
Blue Velvet opens to white picket fences with splashes of colorful flowers enhancing the dream-like mood. A fire truck drives by and the firemen slowly wave their welcome. It's the small town of Lumberton, a name setting the mood all on its own, but as the opening continues you get an extreme sense of surrealism. Our tour comes to an end as a man watering his lawn suffers a heart attack. He tumbles to the ground as the water continues to flow skyward. A little dog climbs on him and begins aggressively biting at the spraying water. A slow pan takes us below the surface, skimming the grassline to reveal a festering pile of beetles writhing in the dirt. This is how Lynch chooses to end our introduction to a town that opened with the bright and beautiful and ends in blackness.
Was it real or just a dream?
We next meet Jeffrey Beaumont played by Kyle MacLachlan, an actor I have never found all that appealing. Jeffrey is the son of the man we saw suffer a heart attack earlier. He visits his father in the hospital and there is an obvious sense of tension in the room and you get the impression they have not seen each other for some time, but the reason for their estrangement is not known… yet.
On Jeffrey's walk back home he happens upon a severed ear in a field. Playing the good Samaritan he takes it to the police and this small appendage becomes the jumping off point for the film. Shortly thereafter Jeffrey goes for a walk to clear his head when Lynch cuts back to the ear on the coroner's table and a camera move takes the audience closer and closer into the ear until we are once again shrouded in blackness… and the story continues as if nothing has changed. But has it?
The rest of the film involves Jeffrey trying to figure out the story behind the ear. He performs his own stake outs, breaks into apartments and begins a love affair with Sandy (Laura Dern) the daughter of the officer in charge of the investigation.
I believe everything that happens between the descent into the ear I just described and a similar exit out of Jeffrey's ear as we wakes toward the end of the film is all in Jeffrey's mind. Let me explain.
It doesn't take long before we get the feeling something has changed after the ear sequence as we are first introduced to Sandy as she appears out of the darkness implying Jeffrey is beginning to pull characters from his real life to tell his story, the way people just seem to pop-up in your dreams out of nowhere. Lynch does say in a documentary on the DVD, "The ear would be an opening into another world."
Photo: MGM Home Video
We next meet Isabella Rossellini and our film's villain played by Dennis Hopper. Their introduction brings to light a whole new group of theories, metaphors and interpretations, primarily just
The big question of course: Is it any good?
Photo: MGM Home Video
Blue Velvet is considered something of a cult classic, a distinction almost all of Lynch's films could wear with honor. For me cult classics are traditionally hit or miss with little room in between, and while fun to pick apart for awhile, this one is a miss for me. Sometimes I just don't have the energy for Lynch.
I do believe this film is pretty straight forward. I know there are things I missed, but I just don't have any interest in searching any further. I can understand why many would want to as Lynch is someone obviously intriguing and skilled at using film to his advantage and engaging a willing audience to try and decipher what he is telling on screen, and I am up for that, at least to a certain extent.
One thing I will say for the film is that I wholeheartedly believe my interpretation is 100% right on, but I can't help but knock it down to 99% as the intensely over-exaggerated appearance of what would be the "real world" is so unbelievable it wouldn't surprise me one iota if Lynch came out and said the exact opposite were true. Lynch doesn't seem to have an overly happy view of the world, which makes even reality a metaphor in this one. I guess it is best to call it "Lynch's charm" and leave it at that. He certainly breathes life into the film world, like it or leave it.
Now, after all this, enjoy this spoof trailer for the film I am sure anyone that has seen Blue Velvet or followed a word I have said is sure to enjoy:
Links from Other Sites You May Like
Showing 5 Comments
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Add a New Comment |
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines

Okay, this post is two years old. I don't care. I just finished watching Blue Velvet and I need to talk about it. I came up with my own theory as I was watching it and I'm 100 percent certain it's right, so I googled it and found a bunch of interpretations that were absolutely facile and nowhere near right. This is the only thing I've foun that corroborates my theory.
First of all, you're dead on.
I identified the Oedipal (sp?) theme early on because I know this was a major theme from Mulholland Drive, which was a film that occurred almost entirely within the mind of one of the characters who had suffered sexual abuse as a child, the dark events and characters were manifestations of the repressed memories of abuse that occasionally surfaced within a fantasy she created for herself to escape her troubled real life.
The same thing is happening in this film.
I think that the only part of Blue Velvet that really happens is when he sees his father in the hospital, from then on, everything we see is an elaborate fantasy constructed by Geoffrey to escape the crushing monotony of suburban life, and to cover up his painful secrets. His father sexually and phsyically abused him as a child, as well as his mother, he was obviously a violent and disturbed man. But when we see him in hospital at the beginning he is frail, vulnerable, weak, childlike. He breathes through a mask to survive. These two polarizing images of his father – abuser and child – merge together to make Frank: violent, perverted, twisted, he wears an oxygen mask and cries out like a helpless child "Mommy! Mommy!".
More specifically, Frank represents what Geoffrey is afraid of turning into.
There are several revealing moments ('when he tells the old lady she's "gonna get it", when he sits on his bed crying, thinking about when he hit Dorothy) that show Geoffrey becoming the abuser, the perpetrator. There's also a moment in the car where Frank turns round and says "you're the same as me!". The driving force of the film is Geoffrey trying to resist falling into the same behaviours as his father, his abuser.
Now, Dorothy. She represents his mother (she accidentally calls him 'Don', the name of her son the first time they are truly intimate; he finds The Hat in her home which gives him pause, the final scene is of Dorothy with her young son wearing that same hat). Geoffrey is struggling with Oedipal sexual feelings for his mother, this conflict is at the root of this film. Another facet of Dorothy is her sexual desire to be harmed – "Hit me!" – this symbolises Geoffreys perception of himself after his abuse, he feels used, broken, dirty, worthless, guilty. He feels unworthy of real intimacy and wants to be hurt physically so he can't be hurt emotionally.
The 'closet scene' represents something Geoffrey witnessed as a child. He hid in a closet and saw his father (Frank) violently physically and sexually abusing his mother (Dorothy), this display of raw animal sexuality was deeply confusing to him and aroused him, something which made him feel guilty and ashamed. "Baby wants to fuck." In this scene, and at several other times, characters stuff their mouth with Blue Velvet, I believe this represents their 'silence' – "putting a sock in it" – they're surpressing their fears and feelings and dark secrets. When the scene is over, Geoffrey comforts her, he becomes the protector of his broken mother.
The "investigation" is a way of stringing together the various half-repressed memories of abuse and to explain them as actions of a psychotic lunatic. "Ben" represents the people close to the family who were of the abuse, but did nothing about it, the punch to the stomach is the symbolic gesture of allowing the abuse to continue through their silence. There are many references to senses in the film, the ear, talk of 'surveillance', the blind man that 'senses' how many fingers he is holding up. This shows the tight-knit structure of small-town suburbia, where nobody has any secrets and everybody is spying on everybody else. Word travells quickly in small towns. When something is wrong, people 'sense' it. The fact that they ignore what is really happening is the true betrayal to Geoffrey.
Towards the end of the film, Geoffrey hides in the closet again as Frank comes looking for him. This is a very obvious scene that represents a memory of his father trying to find Geoffrey with the intention of abusing him – "pretty! pretty!" – when he opens the closet, Geoffrey kills him, and a light goes out. This represents his father dying in real life, the light is the life support machine being switched off. This 'sets him free' from his father's torment and allows him to finally move on. After this, we emerge from the ear (coming out of the fantasy world we entered when we travelled into the ear at the beginning) and we see the Robins that symbolise that everything is alright.
I like your analysis bob, except for at the end, we see jeffrey's father alive, in the backyard with Sandy's father, as Jeff goes into the house for lunch.
I appreciated this more than the original review.
You only cared for a music track in a masterpiece like LOST HIGHWAY? Lame.
LOST HIGHWAY EXPLAINED
This is not a psycho-analysis or a review of Lost Highway's artistic merits. It is only an explanation FOR THOSE WHO HAVE ALREADY SEEN IT. And since you have already seen it I will skip telling the story and only decode it for you.
The "real" backdrop of the movie is this: a man has murdered his wife on suspicion of infidelity. He is sentenced to death by electrocution. While in prison he creates a flashback and a flash-forward. The movie runs linearly through these mental compositions, beginning with the flashback and ending in the flash-forward. The flashback is the man's attempt to understand how he ended up in prison. He then creates a flash-forward to project a fantasy. The flashback informs the flash-forward and both are entirely informed by the reality that led the man to commit the murder in the first place.
FLASHBACK: The first 40 minutes or so of the movie are the flashback. In this Fred lives with his wife Renee, who he believes is cheating on him. Hints that this is unarguably a mental construct are: 1) Renee is constantly in heels, even when she is in a nightgown and fresh out of bed. 2) The video tapes. 3)The mystery man. Renee is constructed as a seductress. The videotapes are messages from the murderer's subconscious trying to tell him he murdered his wife. The mystery man is an embodiment of jealousy/rage whom the murderer himself "let into his house." Fred tells the detectives, "I like to remember things in a particular way." This flashback leads him to where he actually is; in prison.
FLASH-FORWARD: In this fantasy he is the exact opposite of Fred. He is Pete, young, reckless, wild, and cuckolding another, much stronger man (Laurent). The woman is the same person as his wife in the flashback except in this flash-forward fantasy she is won by him (Pete) and ALSO more explicitly imagined as an out-of-control prostitute/amateur pornstar/nymphomaniac who ultimately wants to be with him. The mystery man as embodiment of rage/jealousy first appears in this phase as the cuckolded Laurent's friend. When Pete kills Andy and he and Alice escape to the shed where they copulate successfully – even though at the end Alice tells Pete (who by now visually transforms into Fred) "you can never have me" because in reality she is dead. But then Alice disappears and the mystery man sends Fred back to the motel to abduct and ultimately kill Laurent. He in fact helps Fred kill Laurent after showing Laurent what Laurent is being killed for through the mystery man's video-phone. In this sense the mystery man is not specifically the murderer's jealousy/rage but jealousy/rage in general (hence appearing by Laurent when Laurent suspects he is being cuckolded).
At the end Fred returns to his apartment and lets Fred from the opening scene (flashback Fred) know that Laurent is dead. This isn't a resolution of a through-line but hints at the loop in the murderer's mind where he will probably go over different variations of these two mental compositions over and over as he awaits his electrocution.
In the "real" sequence of events the murderer probably suspected his wife of sleeping with a Laurent. After killing her in a fit of madness, his subconscious attempts to tell him what happened (in the flashback, through the videotapes) while in the flash-forward his imagination/fantasy constructs elaborate characteristics of the two objects of his jealousy/rage: Laurent as a tough gangster whom he cuckolds and kills (this is his mind saying "I banged your girl and killed you mofo – ultimate revenge), and Renee as a nymphomaniac with overly transgressive sexual inclinations (this is his mind saying "man, she loved me but boy was she a slut"). In either case the mystery man is the embodiment of jealousy/rage.