<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The First Time Watching &#039;The Third Man&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:00:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: domenic padulo</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>domenic padulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9704#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;bradbrevet said:&lt;/b&gt; Strangely enough, I watched that one based on your enthusiasm for it and I have Bottle Rocket on my coffee table right now because of you as well. I think you nailed my impression of it though, &quot;lukewarm.&quot; I liked it more than most films, but just didn&#039;t love it. Unfortunately, I am not anticipating any repeat viewings either. :(&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh well... I still feel flattered ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>bradbrevet said:</b> Strangely enough, I watched that one based on your enthusiasm for it and I have Bottle Rocket on my coffee table right now because of you as well. I think you nailed my impression of it though, &quot;lukewarm.&quot; I liked it more than most films, but just didn&#039;t love it. Unfortunately, I am not anticipating any repeat viewings either. :(</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh well&#8230; I still feel flattered ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaraMichelle</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>SaraMichelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9704#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>During the beta testing of that whole &quot;favorite movie&quot; thing you have coming soon, THE THIRD MAN ended up being #21 out of 1,733 films I managed to rate out of your database (yes, I have no life and I am far too obsessive-compulsive, I know). The honest truth is that, had I not had the distinct pleasure to see this film in a movie theater about a decade back I seriously doubt it would ever have ranked quite so high.

The first time I saw the film I liked it fine (the cinematography, Welles&#039; titanic performance, the deliriously perfect Zither score), but it didn&#039;t rock my world. Then I saw it in a theater in a deluxe restored anniversary release and it absolutely blew my mind. The film swept over me, all of its subtle nuances and delicate minutae hitting me like they never had before. From Graham Greene&#039;s brilliant adapation (of his own book) to Carol Reed&#039;s carefully assured direction I fell completely and totally in love. I went back and watched it three more times, the film becoming one of those seminal viewing experiences I&#039;ll remember for the rest of my life.

I guess what I&#039;m saying is this - I get what you&#039;re saying. The movie has an odd ebb adn flow to it that can be a little bit unorthodox and, at times, trying. It takes its time to get to the big reveals. It keeps its cards pressed firmly to the vest, sometimes almsot annoyingly so. Yet it does all this for distinct reasons, that frustration the viewers part almost identical to the growing aggravations on Holly Martins&#039; (so superbly played by an eternally underrated Joseph Cotton) part. This is a picture that demands repeat viewings and almost cries to be seen in the confines of a movie theater. I suggest you give it another chance. You might be surprised what you end up discovering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the beta testing of that whole &quot;favorite movie&quot; thing you have coming soon, THE THIRD MAN ended up being #21 out of 1,733 films I managed to rate out of your database (yes, I have no life and I am far too obsessive-compulsive, I know). The honest truth is that, had I not had the distinct pleasure to see this film in a movie theater about a decade back I seriously doubt it would ever have ranked quite so high.</p>
<p>The first time I saw the film I liked it fine (the cinematography, Welles&#039; titanic performance, the deliriously perfect Zither score), but it didn&#039;t rock my world. Then I saw it in a theater in a deluxe restored anniversary release and it absolutely blew my mind. The film swept over me, all of its subtle nuances and delicate minutae hitting me like they never had before. From Graham Greene&#039;s brilliant adapation (of his own book) to Carol Reed&#039;s carefully assured direction I fell completely and totally in love. I went back and watched it three more times, the film becoming one of those seminal viewing experiences I&#039;ll remember for the rest of my life.</p>
<p>I guess what I&#039;m saying is this &#8211; I get what you&#039;re saying. The movie has an odd ebb adn flow to it that can be a little bit unorthodox and, at times, trying. It takes its time to get to the big reveals. It keeps its cards pressed firmly to the vest, sometimes almsot annoyingly so. Yet it does all this for distinct reasons, that frustration the viewers part almost identical to the growing aggravations on Holly Martins&#039; (so superbly played by an eternally underrated Joseph Cotton) part. This is a picture that demands repeat viewings and almost cries to be seen in the confines of a movie theater. I suggest you give it another chance. You might be surprised what you end up discovering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradbrevet</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>bradbrevet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9704#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;domenic padulo said:&lt;/b&gt; I think we need to address the lukewarm reaction to Mean Streets.  I pretty much felt the same way the first time I saw it, but it gets so much better upon repeat viewings and is now one of my all-time favorites.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Strangely enough, I watched that one based on your enthusiasm for it and I have Bottle Rocket on my coffee table right now because of you as well. I think you nailed my impression of it though, &quot;lukewarm.&quot; I liked it more than most films, but just didn&#039;t love it. Unfortunately, I am not anticipating any repeat viewings either. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>domenic padulo said:</b> I think we need to address the lukewarm reaction to Mean Streets.  I pretty much felt the same way the first time I saw it, but it gets so much better upon repeat viewings and is now one of my all-time favorites.</p></blockquote>
<p>Strangely enough, I watched that one based on your enthusiasm for it and I have Bottle Rocket on my coffee table right now because of you as well. I think you nailed my impression of it though, &quot;lukewarm.&quot; I liked it more than most films, but just didn&#039;t love it. Unfortunately, I am not anticipating any repeat viewings either. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domenic padulo</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>domenic padulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9704#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not too attached to the score either.  It&#039;s good, but I would&#039;ve preferred something a bit darker.

I think we need to address the lukewarm reaction to Mean Streets.  I pretty much felt the same way the first time I saw it, but it gets so much better upon repeat viewings and is now one of my all-time favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not too attached to the score either.  It&#039;s good, but I would&#039;ve preferred something a bit darker.</p>
<p>I think we need to address the lukewarm reaction to Mean Streets.  I pretty much felt the same way the first time I saw it, but it gets so much better upon repeat viewings and is now one of my all-time favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradbrevet</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>bradbrevet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9704#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;davidfrank said:&lt;/b&gt; That may be the 1st time i&#039;ve ever read something on the The Third Man with no mention of the score :) Thoughts?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, I know how everyone thinks it is so much fun and lively and cool to say zither, but if I was going to say anything it would have only been to say that other people have mentioned it. It didn&#039;t move me one way or the other so I just dismissed it.

I don&#039;t really see the big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>davidfrank said:</b> That may be the 1st time i&#039;ve ever read something on the The Third Man with no mention of the score :) Thoughts?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I know how everyone thinks it is so much fun and lively and cool to say zither, but if I was going to say anything it would have only been to say that other people have mentioned it. It didn&#039;t move me one way or the other so I just dismissed it.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t really see the big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9704#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>Never loved this movie either, but I watch it from time to time and yeah the score is - of course - great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never loved this movie either, but I watch it from time to time and yeah the score is &#8211; of course &#8211; great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidfrank</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/first_time_watching_the_third_man/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>davidfrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=9704#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>That may be the 1st time i&#039;ve ever read something on the The Third Man with no mention of the score :) Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may be the 1st time i&#039;ve ever read something on the The Third Man with no mention of the score :) Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-05-25 02:31:42 -->
