<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box-Office Wrap-Up: May 15 &#8211; May 17, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:22:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18047</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 03:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18047</guid>
		<description>Boxofficemojo takes a much brighter view of A&amp;D&#039;s final gross than you do. They point out that, in their novel forms, &quot;Angels and Demons&quot; sold less than half the copies of &quot;The Da Vinci Code,&quot; so a 60% retention is, in fact, very good, especially considering the negative reaction to the first movie.

But of course the best part of the weekend is &quot;Star Trek&quot; dropping only 43%. That&#039;s a REALLY good 2nd-weekend hold for a summer action movie; they normally fall at least 50% (or 55%, or 60+%). I&#039;m glad to see that word-of-mouth is alive and well.

I know why all the movies held so well this weekend, though. It&#039;s because the only new competition was &quot;Angels and Demons,&quot; and it&#039;s the only adult-aimed entertainment in the whole lot (okay, so &quot;Next Day Air&quot; IS rated R, but it doesn&#039;t seem to be aimed at the adult-minded crowd). You&#039;ll notice its only other competition, &quot;State of Play&quot; was one of the few films this week to suffer a bad drop (-50%, which isn&#039;t good for its genre at all). So I&#039;m not surprised that &quot;Monsters vs. Aliens&quot; fell only 8% (also remember that it&#039;s in its 8th weekend, where unpredictably good holds are a bit more likely). Nor am I surprised that &quot;Wolverine&quot; had the best 3rd-weekend hold of all the X-Men movies, even after its worst 2nd-weekend hold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxofficemojo takes a much brighter view of A&amp;D&#039;s final gross than you do. They point out that, in their novel forms, &#034;Angels and Demons&#034; sold less than half the copies of &#034;The Da Vinci Code,&#034; so a 60% retention is, in fact, very good, especially considering the negative reaction to the first movie.</p>
<p>But of course the best part of the weekend is &#034;Star Trek&#034; dropping only 43%. That&#039;s a REALLY good 2nd-weekend hold for a summer action movie; they normally fall at least 50% (or 55%, or 60+%). I&#039;m glad to see that word-of-mouth is alive and well.</p>
<p>I know why all the movies held so well this weekend, though. It&#039;s because the only new competition was &#034;Angels and Demons,&#034; and it&#039;s the only adult-aimed entertainment in the whole lot (okay, so &#034;Next Day Air&#034; IS rated R, but it doesn&#039;t seem to be aimed at the adult-minded crowd). You&#039;ll notice its only other competition, &#034;State of Play&#034; was one of the few films this week to suffer a bad drop (-50%, which isn&#039;t good for its genre at all). So I&#039;m not surprised that &#034;Monsters vs. Aliens&#034; fell only 8% (also remember that it&#039;s in its 8th weekend, where unpredictably good holds are a bit more likely). Nor am I surprised that &#034;Wolverine&#034; had the best 3rd-weekend hold of all the X-Men movies, even after its worst 2nd-weekend hold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18044</guid>
		<description>Next weekend looks like it will be a close one. Terminator will win it, but it won&#039;t out gross Night at the Museum 2 overall. Terminator will open just like Wolverine and tumble off. Night at the Museum will pull a Paul Blart and stick around at least until Ice Age 3, Up might hurt it a little but not much. So...

4-Day

Terminator- 90.0
Night at the Museum- 88.0
Angels- 21.0
Star Trek-20.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next weekend looks like it will be a close one. Terminator will win it, but it won&#039;t out gross Night at the Museum 2 overall. Terminator will open just like Wolverine and tumble off. Night at the Museum will pull a Paul Blart and stick around at least until Ice Age 3, Up might hurt it a little but not much. So&#8230;</p>
<p>4-Day</p>
<p>Terminator- 90.0<br />
Night at the Museum- 88.0<br />
Angels- 21.0<br />
Star Trek-20.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topy</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18043</link>
		<dc:creator>Topy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18043</guid>
		<description>I read something that showed that Angels and Demons only sold less than half of what The Da Vinci Code Books sold. Which means it could be the reason why A&amp;D is far from DVC&#039;s numbers. That and because some didn&#039;t like the first one.

Next Week?

Terminator - 85M
Night at the Museum - 73M
Star Trek - 27M
A&amp;D - 24M
Dance Flick and Wolverine - Whoever wins, still loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read something that showed that Angels and Demons only sold less than half of what The Da Vinci Code Books sold. Which means it could be the reason why A&amp;D is far from DVC&#039;s numbers. That and because some didn&#039;t like the first one.</p>
<p>Next Week?</p>
<p>Terminator &#8211; 85M<br />
Night at the Museum &#8211; 73M<br />
Star Trek &#8211; 27M<br />
A&amp;D &#8211; 24M<br />
Dance Flick and Wolverine &#8211; Whoever wins, still loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Debono</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18037</link>
		<dc:creator>John Debono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18037</guid>
		<description>1. Terminator: Salvation: $102.4 million 
2. Night At The Museum 2: $48.6 million
3. Star Trek: $29.1 million
4. Angels And Demons: $19.8 million
5. Dance Flick: $14.4 million
6. Wolverine: $6.7 million
7. Ghost Of Girlfriend&#039;s Past: $4.2 million
8. Obsessed: $2.9 million
9. Monsters Vs. Aliens: $1.8 million
10. 17 Again: $1.3 million 
Terminator will win, NATM 2 will pull a Narnia and will make slightly more then half of the last film&#039;s money and Angels and Demons will hopefully stop bad Dan Brown books from being turned into equally bad movies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Terminator: Salvation: $102.4 million<br />
2. Night At The Museum 2: $48.6 million<br />
3. Star Trek: $29.1 million<br />
4. Angels And Demons: $19.8 million<br />
5. Dance Flick: $14.4 million<br />
6. Wolverine: $6.7 million<br />
7. Ghost Of Girlfriend&#039;s Past: $4.2 million<br />
8. Obsessed: $2.9 million<br />
9. Monsters Vs. Aliens: $1.8 million<br />
10. 17 Again: $1.3 million<br />
Terminator will win, NATM 2 will pull a Narnia and will make slightly more then half of the last film&#039;s money and Angels and Demons will hopefully stop bad Dan Brown books from being turned into equally bad movies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leandro Dubost</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18034</link>
		<dc:creator>Leandro Dubost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18034</guid>
		<description>I think Terminator may be able to do 90-100 million on the 4-day weekend. And Night at the Museum 2 should do great too, something around 70-80 million.

I don&#039;t know about the rest though...
With two high profile movies (and sequesl!) opening this weekend, I suppose A&amp;D, Star Trek and Wolverine will take huge drops. Well, A&amp;D and Wolveirne CERTAINLY will, I&#039;m not certain about Star Trek... I think it and Terminator shares the same audience, so maybe it will drop a lot. Maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Terminator may be able to do 90-100 million on the 4-day weekend. And Night at the Museum 2 should do great too, something around 70-80 million.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t know about the rest though&#8230;<br />
With two high profile movies (and sequesl!) opening this weekend, I suppose A&amp;D, Star Trek and Wolverine will take huge drops. Well, A&amp;D and Wolveirne CERTAINLY will, I&#039;m not certain about Star Trek&#8230; I think it and Terminator shares the same audience, so maybe it will drop a lot. Maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bartowski</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18033</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bartowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18033</guid>
		<description>I was .2 MILLION off on my prediction for STAR TREK!! I predicted $43.2 million while it made exactly $43 million! You should keep mentioning who gives the best predictions, Laremy.. if I remember, I was the only one confident enough to predict it doesn&#039;t make under $40 mill but breaks through that and nabs $43 mill.

As for the Memorial Day weekend...

EARLY 4-DAY PREDICTIONS
1. TERMINATOR: SALVATION - $101.2 million
2. NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM 2: BATTLE OF THE SMITHSONIAN - $89.5 million
3. DANCE FLICK - $22.4 million


=]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was .2 MILLION off on my prediction for STAR TREK!! I predicted $43.2 million while it made exactly $43 million! You should keep mentioning who gives the best predictions, Laremy.. if I remember, I was the only one confident enough to predict it doesn&#039;t make under $40 mill but breaks through that and nabs $43 mill.</p>
<p>As for the Memorial Day weekend&#8230;</p>
<p>EARLY 4-DAY PREDICTIONS<br />
1. TERMINATOR: SALVATION &#8211; $101.2 million<br />
2. NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM 2: BATTLE OF THE SMITHSONIAN &#8211; $89.5 million<br />
3. DANCE FLICK &#8211; $22.4 million</p>
<p>=]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: movieguy451</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18031</link>
		<dc:creator>movieguy451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18031</guid>
		<description>I saw Terminator Salvation about a week ago at an early screening and it&#039;s not the badass awesome looking film the trailer makes it out to be by any means. I think it&#039;ll win big its opening weekend, but people won&#039;t be going back for seconds like Star Trek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Terminator Salvation about a week ago at an early screening and it&#039;s not the badass awesome looking film the trailer makes it out to be by any means. I think it&#039;ll win big its opening weekend, but people won&#039;t be going back for seconds like Star Trek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopher</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18030</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18030</guid>
		<description>Correction: Termynator at 85</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: Termynator at 85</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopher</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18029</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18029</guid>
		<description>4-day Period: 

Termynator: 95
NATM: 75
ST: 33
A&amp;D: 32
Dance Flick: 12
Wolverine: 10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4-day Period: </p>
<p>Termynator: 95<br />
NATM: 75<br />
ST: 33<br />
A&amp;D: 32<br />
Dance Flick: 12<br />
Wolverine: 10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnglishGavz</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18028</link>
		<dc:creator>EnglishGavz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18028</guid>
		<description>I really feel that last year all these films would have pulled more, I can&#039;t remember exactly but I think ever since the resecion the big blockbuster films have lost a good 10 million from what they normally have. But maybe I&#039;m completly wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really feel that last year all these films would have pulled more, I can&#039;t remember exactly but I think ever since the resecion the big blockbuster films have lost a good 10 million from what they normally have. But maybe I&#039;m completly wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bustray</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18027</link>
		<dc:creator>Bustray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18027</guid>
		<description>For the 4-day weekend, I&#039;d say Terminator at around $83 million and Night At The Museum at around $72 million, because it&#039;s been over a month since a wide release that was aimed at younger audiences came out. Oh, and Dance Flick will pull in around $20 million, because it looks mad funny. And finally, we&#039;ll have another weekend where the top 5 will all make over $10 million (knock on wood).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the 4-day weekend, I&#039;d say Terminator at around $83 million and Night At The Museum at around $72 million, because it&#039;s been over a month since a wide release that was aimed at younger audiences came out. Oh, and Dance Flick will pull in around $20 million, because it looks mad funny. And finally, we&#039;ll have another weekend where the top 5 will all make over $10 million (knock on wood).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAB</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18026</link>
		<dc:creator>JAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18026</guid>
		<description>Terminator: $75 Million
Night at the Museum: $43 Million
Star Trek: $33 Million
Angels &amp; Demons: $22 Million
Dance Flick: $11 Million
Wolverine: $6 Million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminator: $75 Million<br />
Night at the Museum: $43 Million<br />
Star Trek: $33 Million<br />
Angels &amp; Demons: $22 Million<br />
Dance Flick: $11 Million<br />
Wolverine: $6 Million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler C</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18024</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18024</guid>
		<description>Terminator: 12 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminator: 12 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-may-15-may-17-2009/#comment-18021</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 18:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-18021</guid>
		<description>Early Predictions...

Terminator Salvation - 82.7
Night at the Museum II - 68.2
Star Trek - 28.9
Wolverine - Screwed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early Predictions&#8230;</p>
<p>Terminator Salvation &#8211; 82.7<br />
Night at the Museum II &#8211; 68.2<br />
Star Trek &#8211; 28.9<br />
Wolverine &#8211; Screwed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-05-23 19:39:36 -->
