<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box-Office Wrap-Up: Mar. 27 &#8211; Mar. 29, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:00:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Laremy</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14613</link>
		<dc:creator>Laremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14613</guid>
		<description>I actually think Hannah will have higher production values than Dragonball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think Hannah will have higher production values than Dragonball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14610</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14610</guid>
		<description>Just a side note- saw Watchmen again with my cousin who never saw it and we both enjoyed it a lot. I&#039;m actually really glad I got to see it again; I noticed some really cool easter eggs and things that I never got the first time around.

Back to the subject- I think &quot;Fast and Furious&quot; will perform exactly like the last &quot;Mummy&quot; movie. Like exactly- $40 million opening, will barely pass $100 million when all is said and done, and I think it&#039;ll get fairly horrid reviews as well. I&#039;ll still see it just because I enjoyed the last films, plus this is basically a summer film coming out in April.

Oh and who wants to have a double feature of &quot;Hannah Montana&quot;/&quot;Dragon Ball&quot; on April 10th? Any takers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a side note- saw Watchmen again with my cousin who never saw it and we both enjoyed it a lot. I&#039;m actually really glad I got to see it again; I noticed some really cool easter eggs and things that I never got the first time around.</p>
<p>Back to the subject- I think &#034;Fast and Furious&#034; will perform exactly like the last &#034;Mummy&#034; movie. Like exactly- $40 million opening, will barely pass $100 million when all is said and done, and I think it&#039;ll get fairly horrid reviews as well. I&#039;ll still see it just because I enjoyed the last films, plus this is basically a summer film coming out in April.</p>
<p>Oh and who wants to have a double feature of &#034;Hannah Montana&#034;/&#034;Dragon Ball&#034; on April 10th? Any takers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14596</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14596</guid>
		<description>&quot;Race to Witch Mountain&quot; fell not because children&#039;s live action isn&#039;t bankable, but because it was going up against &quot;Monster vs. Aliens.&quot; Look at the statistic for Paul Blart this week: it also fell around 55%. And speaking of Paul Blart, there&#039;s another example of children&#039;s live action being bankable, other than HSM3 that you mentioned.

And I&#039;ll say your $10 million prediction for &quot;Adventureland&quot; is about right. I was lucky enough to see an advanced screening at my college campus last Thursday, and it was a pretty good movie, but not really that amazing. Its 1800 theater count doesn&#039;t look that promising. Expect word of mouth to be moderate at best, with a 2nd weekend drop in the high 40&#039;s%, or maybe low 50&#039;s% if audiences really don&#039;t warm up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Race to Witch Mountain&#034; fell not because children&#039;s live action isn&#039;t bankable, but because it was going up against &#034;Monster vs. Aliens.&#034; Look at the statistic for Paul Blart this week: it also fell around 55%. And speaking of Paul Blart, there&#039;s another example of children&#039;s live action being bankable, other than HSM3 that you mentioned.</p>
<p>And I&#039;ll say your $10 million prediction for &#034;Adventureland&#034; is about right. I was lucky enough to see an advanced screening at my college campus last Thursday, and it was a pretty good movie, but not really that amazing. Its 1800 theater count doesn&#039;t look that promising. Expect word of mouth to be moderate at best, with a 2nd weekend drop in the high 40&#039;s%, or maybe low 50&#039;s% if audiences really don&#039;t warm up to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mihirkula</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14592</link>
		<dc:creator>mihirkula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14592</guid>
		<description>Fast and furious will not overhaul even the $35m mark ... and i bet it gets a 40% at rottentomatoes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast and furious will not overhaul even the $35m mark &#8230; and i bet it gets a 40% at rottentomatoes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy wein</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14587</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy wein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14587</guid>
		<description>and if it dosnt make back its budget in the theater it will on rentals as wwe films make between 16-30 mil on rentals alone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if it dosnt make back its budget in the theater it will on rentals as wwe films make between 16-30 mil on rentals alone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy wein</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14586</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy wein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14586</guid>
		<description>12 rounds has the 2nd highest opening weekend of a wwe film after the marine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 rounds has the 2nd highest opening weekend of a wwe film after the marine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athar</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14584</link>
		<dc:creator>Athar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14584</guid>
		<description>Fast &amp; Furious would be good, but i feel it might not cross the $40mil mark... maybe something around $38mil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast &amp; Furious would be good, but i feel it might not cross the $40mil mark&#8230; maybe something around $38mil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bartowski</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14583</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bartowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14583</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the shout-out, Laremy. I&#039;ve been pretty awesome when it comes to predicting box office. Maybe I SHOULD take your job ;p

Haha. Philip, by now.. RTWM should already be passing $70+ million to have been a certified hit like Disney&#039;s past March/September releases.

As for the April 3-5 weekend, I&#039;d say &quot;Fast &amp; Furious&quot; finishes the box-office race with $45-49 million, while &quot;Adventureland&quot; BARELY clears $10 million, if that.

=]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the shout-out, Laremy. I&#039;ve been pretty awesome when it comes to predicting box office. Maybe I SHOULD take your job ;p</p>
<p>Haha. Philip, by now.. RTWM should already be passing $70+ million to have been a certified hit like Disney&#039;s past March/September releases.</p>
<p>As for the April 3-5 weekend, I&#039;d say &#034;Fast &amp; Furious&#034; finishes the box-office race with $45-49 million, while &#034;Adventureland&#034; BARELY clears $10 million, if that.</p>
<p>=]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-27-mar-29-2009/#comment-14580</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14580</guid>
		<description>wait..why is Race To Witch Mountain&#039;s 53+ million  a weak result??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait..why is Race To Witch Mountain&#039;s 53+ million  a weak result??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-02-10 21:19:32 -->
