<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box-Office Wrap-Up: Mar. 13 &#8211; Mar. 15, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:22:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Tralder</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/#comment-13772</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Tralder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-13772</guid>
		<description>1.  Comparing Watchmen to Fight Club?  The problem is that Fight Club was good....

2. If &quot;Knowing&quot; is a hit I&#039;ll lose my faith in humanity.  Nic Cage needs to retire, stat.

3.  Roberts doesn&#039;t do much for me, but Tony Gilroy does.  After Michael Clayton, I&#039;ll watch anything that man writes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Comparing Watchmen to Fight Club?  The problem is that Fight Club was good&#8230;.</p>
<p>2. If &#034;Knowing&#034; is a hit I&#039;ll lose my faith in humanity.  Nic Cage needs to retire, stat.</p>
<p>3.  Roberts doesn&#039;t do much for me, but Tony Gilroy does.  After Michael Clayton, I&#039;ll watch anything that man writes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/#comment-13771</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-13771</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not gonna get into the whole &quot;Watchmen epically failed&quot; thing today, actually. I responded on Steve Mason&#039;s article @ Bighollywood which was what I would&#039;ve said here, but Laremy&#039;s on it this weekend, and there&#039;s not much else to be said, honestly. Just that remember, movies like &quot;Fight Club&quot; and &quot;Blade Runner&quot; failed at the box office, and they&#039;re all welcomed warmly today. Just my two cents on that.

So next weekend, huh? It&#039;s not looking good IMO. &quot;Knowing&quot; just seems like &quot;Next&quot; again, so I don&#039;t really see it doing so strongly. &quot;Duplicity&quot;...Julia Roberts hasn&#039;t had a bonafide hit in years (specifically where she was the headlining star: the Ocean&#039;s Movies did alright, but that wasn&#039;t because of her), Clive Owen isn&#039;t a box-office superstar either, and the crime comedy film always fails. Always. Even Jim Carrey&#039;s &quot;Fun With Dick and Jane&quot; wasn&#039;t really a success when you take the budget into account. &quot;I Love You Man&quot; has the most potential, but it isn&#039;t having the hype that &quot;Role Models&quot; and &quot;Forgetting Sarah Marshall&quot; had when they opened. But who knows.

Me, I&#039;m just waiting until &quot;Monsters vs. Aliens&quot; frankly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not gonna get into the whole &#034;Watchmen epically failed&#034; thing today, actually. I responded on Steve Mason&#039;s article @ Bighollywood which was what I would&#039;ve said here, but Laremy&#039;s on it this weekend, and there&#039;s not much else to be said, honestly. Just that remember, movies like &#034;Fight Club&#034; and &#034;Blade Runner&#034; failed at the box office, and they&#039;re all welcomed warmly today. Just my two cents on that.</p>
<p>So next weekend, huh? It&#039;s not looking good IMO. &#034;Knowing&#034; just seems like &#034;Next&#034; again, so I don&#039;t really see it doing so strongly. &#034;Duplicity&#034;&#8230;Julia Roberts hasn&#039;t had a bonafide hit in years (specifically where she was the headlining star: the Ocean&#039;s Movies did alright, but that wasn&#039;t because of her), Clive Owen isn&#039;t a box-office superstar either, and the crime comedy film always fails. Always. Even Jim Carrey&#039;s &#034;Fun With Dick and Jane&#034; wasn&#039;t really a success when you take the budget into account. &#034;I Love You Man&#034; has the most potential, but it isn&#039;t having the hype that &#034;Role Models&#034; and &#034;Forgetting Sarah Marshall&#034; had when they opened. But who knows.</p>
<p>Me, I&#039;m just waiting until &#034;Monsters vs. Aliens&#034; frankly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/#comment-13761</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-13761</guid>
		<description>I just hope that &quot;Knowing&quot; doesn&#039;t put a dent into &quot;Taken&quot; next week. I really enjoyed &quot;Taken,&quot; and I&#039;m glad to see an action movie that&#039;s holding like it was released in the 80&#039;s.

I&#039;m going to be watching &quot;Watchmen&quot; again tonight, by the way, so I&#039;ll be part of that $18 million. This means that I will have given 33% of my business to Watchmen on opening weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope that &#034;Knowing&#034; doesn&#039;t put a dent into &#034;Taken&#034; next week. I really enjoyed &#034;Taken,&#034; and I&#039;m glad to see an action movie that&#039;s holding like it was released in the 80&#039;s.</p>
<p>I&#039;m going to be watching &#034;Watchmen&#034; again tonight, by the way, so I&#039;ll be part of that $18 million. This means that I will have given 33% of my business to Watchmen on opening weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/#comment-13758</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-13758</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-13756&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Leandro Dubost&lt;/a&gt;: Hahahaha so true maybe next time we might do something of &quot;his own&quot; good for taken and witch that&#039;s a good return</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-13756" rel="nofollow">Leandro Dubost</a>: Hahahaha so true maybe next time we might do something of &#034;his own&#034; good for taken and witch that&#039;s a good return</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leandro Dubost</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/#comment-13756</link>
		<dc:creator>Leandro Dubost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-13756</guid>
		<description>So... Does Warner Brothers still consider Zack Snyder &#039;visionary&#039; now?! =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; Does Warner Brothers still consider Zack Snyder &#039;visionary&#039; now?! =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnglishGavz</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-mar-13-mar-15-2009/#comment-13755</link>
		<dc:creator>EnglishGavz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-13755</guid>
		<description>Wow, Zach Snyders first fail, now he truly is a member of Hollywood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Zach Snyders first fail, now he truly is a member of Hollywood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-05-23 19:33:23 -->
