<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box-Office Wrap-Up: Apr. 24 &#8211; Apr. 26, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:00:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Athar</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16816</link>
		<dc:creator>Athar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16816</guid>
		<description>Wolverine has got to hit the 100 million mark... i wud say something around 110mil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolverine has got to hit the 100 million mark&#8230; i wud say something around 110mil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bartowski</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16688</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bartowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16688</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this weekend was totally unpredictable so I didn&#039;t even bother to try. 

As for next weekend... I&#039;m thinking WOLVERINE will make $85+ million but not much over $101 million. GHOSTS OF GIRLFRIENDS PAST will make $24-27 million.. the usual for that type of run-of-the-mill high-concept chick flick. And I honestly thought BATTLE FOR TERRA would be promoted much more by now but I&#039;ve seen nothin&#039;. I&#039;ll keep it at $8 million for now.

:]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this weekend was totally unpredictable so I didn&#039;t even bother to try. </p>
<p>As for next weekend&#8230; I&#039;m thinking WOLVERINE will make $85+ million but not much over $101 million. GHOSTS OF GIRLFRIENDS PAST will make $24-27 million.. the usual for that type of run-of-the-mill high-concept chick flick. And I honestly thought BATTLE FOR TERRA would be promoted much more by now but I&#039;ve seen nothin&#039;. I&#039;ll keep it at $8 million for now.</p>
<p>:]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16674</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16674</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wolverine&quot; will get $75-100 million.
&quot;Ghosts of Girlfriends Past&quot; will succeed at counterprogramming and rack up $15-20 million.
&quot;Battle for Terra,&quot; opening only on 1000 screens with very little advertisement, will be lucky to get past $5 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Wolverine&#034; will get $75-100 million.<br />
&#034;Ghosts of Girlfriends Past&#034; will succeed at counterprogramming and rack up $15-20 million.<br />
&#034;Battle for Terra,&#034; opening only on 1000 screens with very little advertisement, will be lucky to get past $5 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16671</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16671</guid>
		<description>I saw Crank 2 this weekend.   I enjoyed it, but why would Jason Statham do that movie?  The first one was weird enough, but OMG.  He&#039;s proven to be a fine actor, but how can he get good roles like &quot;The Bank Job&quot; after that performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Crank 2 this weekend.   I enjoyed it, but why would Jason Statham do that movie?  The first one was weird enough, but OMG.  He&#039;s proven to be a fine actor, but how can he get good roles like &#034;The Bank Job&#034; after that performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryce</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16669</link>
		<dc:creator>bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16669</guid>
		<description>does anyone know how much wolverine is spending on marketing? i know it has to be alot because everytime i turn on the TV i see hugh jackman looking pissed w/ claws coming out of his hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know how much wolverine is spending on marketing? i know it has to be alot because everytime i turn on the TV i see hugh jackman looking pissed w/ claws coming out of his hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joker47</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16668</link>
		<dc:creator>joker47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16668</guid>
		<description>I can see Wolverine making about 85-90 mllion. Girlfriends Past about 30 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see Wolverine making about 85-90 mllion. Girlfriends Past about 30 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bustray</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16667</link>
		<dc:creator>Bustray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16667</guid>
		<description>Wolverine... it could open anywhere from $75-$120 million... but because it seems like so many films are over-achieving this year, I&#039;m going to say around $105 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolverine&#8230; it could open anywhere from $75-$120 million&#8230; but because it seems like so many films are over-achieving this year, I&#039;m going to say around $105 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.acailovers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16665</link>
		<dc:creator>www.acailovers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16665</guid>
		<description>$107 million!  Thursday midnight to sunday night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$107 million!  Thursday midnight to sunday night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16664</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16664</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m saying high 90&#039;s- low 100&#039;s, just because prequels rarely do as well as original films box office wise, plus this looks like just another &quot;X-Men&quot; movie, not a huge must-see event, but being another X-Men movie is an event in itself for people, so it&#039;ll open well.

&quot;Ghosts&quot; will open well I think, there hasn&#039;t been a big romantic comedy like this since &quot;Shopaholic&quot; a while ago, plus the leads often do well in this genre (let&#039;s ignore &quot;Catch and Release&quot; shall we?), so mid 20 million for the film, followed by decent if not long legs.

Terra= 8million. Sorry, looks like junk, sci-fi animated films always bomb (For every &quot;Wall-E&quot;  there&#039;s 10  &quot;Space Chimps&quot;&#039;, &quot;Final Fantasy&quot;&#039; and &quot;Star Wars: The Clone Wars&quot;), the only thing it has going for it is the 3D showings...

Oh, just a comment because it was mentioned in the column; saw &quot;The Soloist&quot; and I agree, it totally could&#039;ve done better had it been released in December; it has the likable leads and the interesting subject matter that would&#039;ve made the film a bigger success.

 However, I have to say that America was right in (somewhat) ignoring the film; it&#039;s not terrible but it&#039;s completely uneven and uninspired. Very, very disappointed considering all the talent behind the flick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m saying high 90&#039;s- low 100&#039;s, just because prequels rarely do as well as original films box office wise, plus this looks like just another &#034;X-Men&#034; movie, not a huge must-see event, but being another X-Men movie is an event in itself for people, so it&#039;ll open well.</p>
<p>&#034;Ghosts&#034; will open well I think, there hasn&#039;t been a big romantic comedy like this since &#034;Shopaholic&#034; a while ago, plus the leads often do well in this genre (let&#039;s ignore &#034;Catch and Release&#034; shall we?), so mid 20 million for the film, followed by decent if not long legs.</p>
<p>Terra= 8million. Sorry, looks like junk, sci-fi animated films always bomb (For every &#034;Wall-E&#034;  there&#039;s 10  &#034;Space Chimps&#034;&#039;, &#034;Final Fantasy&#034;&#039; and &#034;Star Wars: The Clone Wars&#034;), the only thing it has going for it is the 3D showings&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, just a comment because it was mentioned in the column; saw &#034;The Soloist&#034; and I agree, it totally could&#039;ve done better had it been released in December; it has the likable leads and the interesting subject matter that would&#039;ve made the film a bigger success.</p>
<p> However, I have to say that America was right in (somewhat) ignoring the film; it&#039;s not terrible but it&#039;s completely uneven and uninspired. Very, very disappointed considering all the talent behind the flick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnglishGavz</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16663</link>
		<dc:creator>EnglishGavz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16663</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s outselling Iron Man, so I&#039;m gonna say 122.7 million. Hold me to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s outselling Iron Man, so I&#039;m gonna say 122.7 million. Hold me to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NackAttack</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16655</link>
		<dc:creator>NackAttack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16655</guid>
		<description>I think Wolverine will open in the mid to high 80&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Wolverine will open in the mid to high 80&#039;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-wrap-up-apr-24-apr-26-2009/#comment-16653</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-16653</guid>
		<description>i think it will be around 90-110 million..but the super buzz could help it garner more..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it will be around 90-110 million..but the super buzz could help it garner more..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-02-10 21:26:19 -->
