<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box-Office Oracle: Mar. 20 &#8211; Mar. 22, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-oracle-mar-20-mar-22-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-oracle-mar-20-mar-22-2009/</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:00:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-oracle-mar-20-mar-22-2009/#comment-14059</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14059</guid>
		<description>Slumdog Millionaire and Taken will still be in the Top 10? Coming after Juno last year, I think we can safely say one thing: Fox may be awful at producing movies, but they&#039;re sure effing good at marketing the things!

Maybe Fox should just pluck up movies that have already been made and do their splendid marketing work, and that way we won&#039;t hear any more disaster stories from the Fox movies sets about the studio executives screwing the directors over and interfering with their visions.

The platform release, a la &quot;Slumdog Millionaire,&quot; Juno,&quot; and &quot;Little Miss Sunshine,&quot; seems to be their magic speciality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slumdog Millionaire and Taken will still be in the Top 10? Coming after Juno last year, I think we can safely say one thing: Fox may be awful at producing movies, but they&#039;re sure effing good at marketing the things!</p>
<p>Maybe Fox should just pluck up movies that have already been made and do their splendid marketing work, and that way we won&#039;t hear any more disaster stories from the Fox movies sets about the studio executives screwing the directors over and interfering with their visions.</p>
<p>The platform release, a la &#034;Slumdog Millionaire,&#034; Juno,&#034; and &#034;Little Miss Sunshine,&#034; seems to be their magic speciality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-oracle-mar-20-mar-22-2009/#comment-14034</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14034</guid>
		<description>If you look up in the dictionary (remember those) “downslope&quot;, it says Tom Sizemore in &quot;Super Capers&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look up in the dictionary (remember those) “downslope&#034;, it says Tom Sizemore in &#034;Super Capers&#034;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saky</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-oracle-mar-20-mar-22-2009/#comment-14031</link>
		<dc:creator>Saky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14031</guid>
		<description>I think that &#039;Knowing&#039; will do better than u think. OW 25-35mil$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that &#039;Knowing&#039; will do better than u think. OW 25-35mil$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-oracle-mar-20-mar-22-2009/#comment-14017</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14017</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;Witch Mountain&quot; will hold up better than you think- it&#039;s still the only family film out there right now (for a whole week!) and everyone that I&#039;ve talked to liked it (the core audience of families and soccer mom, etc) so word of mouth is good (much like that &quot;Chihuahua&quot; movie last year). 

Um...Yeah I think &quot;Duplicity&quot; will underperform by a bit, just because Julia Roberts isn&#039;t as big a star as she used to be, and considering the track record of &quot;crime romantic comedy films&quot; (hint: its not a very good track record), it&#039;ll disappoint (prob. $30-35 mil total, 12 million opening)

Next weekend...&quot;12 Rounds&quot; looks like someone saw &quot;The Marine&quot; and &quot;Die Hard with a Vengance&quot; and went &quot;Hey, let&#039;s mash these two together for no damn reason&quot;. So prob. 12 million total is the best case scenario with a lucrative DVD release I&#039;m sure.

I still dunno what&#039;s going on w/ Haunting in Connecticut, but I think people are on horror overload now, so it might perform about as well as &quot;Last house&quot; did last weekend.

We&#039;ll talk &quot;Monsters vs. Aliens&quot; next week since I&#039;m rambling on yet again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#034;Witch Mountain&#034; will hold up better than you think- it&#039;s still the only family film out there right now (for a whole week!) and everyone that I&#039;ve talked to liked it (the core audience of families and soccer mom, etc) so word of mouth is good (much like that &#034;Chihuahua&#034; movie last year). </p>
<p>Um&#8230;Yeah I think &#034;Duplicity&#034; will underperform by a bit, just because Julia Roberts isn&#039;t as big a star as she used to be, and considering the track record of &#034;crime romantic comedy films&#034; (hint: its not a very good track record), it&#039;ll disappoint (prob. $30-35 mil total, 12 million opening)</p>
<p>Next weekend&#8230;&#034;12 Rounds&#034; looks like someone saw &#034;The Marine&#034; and &#034;Die Hard with a Vengance&#034; and went &#034;Hey, let&#039;s mash these two together for no damn reason&#034;. So prob. 12 million total is the best case scenario with a lucrative DVD release I&#039;m sure.</p>
<p>I still dunno what&#039;s going on w/ Haunting in Connecticut, but I think people are on horror overload now, so it might perform about as well as &#034;Last house&#034; did last weekend.</p>
<p>We&#039;ll talk &#034;Monsters vs. Aliens&#034; next week since I&#039;m rambling on yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bustray</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/box-office-oracle-mar-20-mar-22-2009/#comment-14007</link>
		<dc:creator>Bustray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=#comment-14007</guid>
		<description>My predics:

1. I Love You Man- $20.1 million
2. Knowing- $18.4 million
3. Duplicity- $16.1 million
4. Race To Witch Mountain- $13.7 million
5. Watchmen- $7.9 million
6. Taken- $5.5 million
7. The Last House To The Left- $4.8 million (I&#039;m predicting that I Love You Man will take the older teenager and adult demographics)
8. Madea Goes To Jail- $3.0 million
9. Slumdog Millionaire- $2.7 million
10. Paul Blart: Mall Cop- $2.1 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My predics:</p>
<p>1. I Love You Man- $20.1 million<br />
2. Knowing- $18.4 million<br />
3. Duplicity- $16.1 million<br />
4. Race To Witch Mountain- $13.7 million<br />
5. Watchmen- $7.9 million<br />
6. Taken- $5.5 million<br />
7. The Last House To The Left- $4.8 million (I&#039;m predicting that I Love You Man will take the older teenager and adult demographics)<br />
8. Madea Goes To Jail- $3.0 million<br />
9. Slumdog Millionaire- $2.7 million<br />
10. Paul Blart: Mall Cop- $2.1 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.ropeofsilicon.com @ 2012-02-10 20:25:33 -->
