hot movie previews > The Twilight Saga: E...NineLegionArmoredRemember MeLetters to JulietSalt
 
Filed under: Coming Up Next

Zemeckis Set To Use Performance Capture for Remake of Beatles' 'Yellow Submarine'

Oh boy, more CGI!

I'm not sure which one of the follow techniques annoys me more when it comes to movies: performance capture or 3-D. Sure, I'll give both of them a chance at every turn, but both seem so pointless. I have a hard time looking at one or the other as anything more than a gimmick to distract me from other areas in which the films are lacking. Had Polar Express used traditional animation it could have been far more magical with more time spent on story and less time spent on supposedly bleeding-edge technology. Had Beowulf been made as a live-action feature instead of a lame-duck attempt at creating an edgy performance capture piece it could have been great. How will A Christmas Carol turn out on November 6? Who knows? I'm hoping for the best, but I can't say I am personally all that excited about what Zemeckis is cooking up next.

Mike Fleming at Variety reports Disney and Zemeckis are negotiating to remake Yellow Submarine, the 1968 psychedelic animated film based on the music of The Beatles. Word is they are in the midst of a complicated rights deal to acquire the use of 16 original Beatles songs for a movie Zemeckis will direct in the performance-capture 3-D digital production format he employed for this holiday season's A Christmas Carol.

I have not seen the original film and considering I am not a fan of The Beatles in any way I will have to give you Fleming's description of the plot saying the storyline took place in Pepperland, an undersea paradise protected by Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. When the band is captured by the music-hating Blue Meanies, a soldier is sent to Liverpool to fetch the Fab Four, who hop in the submarine and save the day.

An obvious key to the deal is the opportunity for Zemeckis to have access to classic Beatles tunes, from the title song to "All Together Now," "Baby You’re a Rich Man," "All You Need Is Love," "When I'm 64," "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" and "Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band."

Despite my own lack of interest in The Beatles, Fleming brings up a good point noting the upcoming release of "The Beatles: Rock Band," a title that is sure to be a big hit with fans of the "Rock Band" game, and fans of all ages I would assume. On top of that there are apparently new remastered editions of The Beatles' albums due in September, but I would think those would cater more to the already established, and massive, fanbase.

Since my interest in The Beatles and Zemeckis' performance capture is minimal, my interest in this film is basically zero, but I am sure there are many of you out there on the other side of the fence. So, speak up in the comments. Does this interest you or would you prefer they left it alone?

One thing's for certain, Zemeckis is continuing to prove his dedication to perfecting performance capture animation. James Cameron is using a similar technique for Avatar, but when I look at it all I see is CGI, but I will admit things have already come a long way since Polar Express in 2004, but I can't say I see the gains to be all that advantageous.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Dude, you are probably the only person in the world who doesn't likeThe Beatles. Well, I like them but my interest in motion capture can be accounted as negative, so I really don't care about this movie.

- Paes
( August 19th, 2009 | 6:24 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

@Paes: Perhaps I should clarify, it's not that I don't like the Beatles as much as I don't anything them. I don't love them, don't hate them, just don't really care.

- Brad Brevet (Post Author)
( August 19th, 2009 | 7:45 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

Brad: Even if you're neither here nor there on The Beatles, every film fan/buff/whatever should watch Richard Lester's A Hard Day's Night. Hugely influential little film, that. Don't worry about Help!, though. Fans only, that one.

Same goes for Yellow Submarine, actually. What little charm that film has is in the fact that it's a product of its time. Remaking it would be like… remaking The French Connection or something. Pointless. But most remakes are, anyway. I can only really think of two remakes (that is, new version of original films, not new adaptations of books or plays, et cetera) that I enjoyed more than the originals. And, funnily enough, they were both directed by Martin Scorsese. Zemeckis is no Scorsese.

That being said, I kinda enjoyed Beowulf. I see what they're going for – a seamless integration between characters and effects, something that traditional animation has enjoyed since its inception (obviously) but something that is still yet to be totally achieved in live action. But I do wish Zemeckis would go back to live action… Cast Away was a terrific film, not to mention his earlier successes. I was hoping for a Roger Rabbit sequel, anyway.

- Carson Dyle
( August 19th, 2009 | 7:54 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

@Carson Dyle: I know Zemeckis also likes the ability to be able to work in what essentially is 360-degree space. Once he has his actors' performances captured he can move the camera wherever he wants, essentially adjusting the performance and angle for his immediate needs. It makes sense, but I have yet to see it work and I still don't think I will ever come to terms with CGI characters over live-action characters, but I will leave myself open to have that opinion changed.

- Brad Brevet (Post Author)
( August 19th, 2009 | 8:00 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

Brad- OK, I get it. You do not care about The Beatles. How many times in one article do you have to be repetitive in your "lack of interest", "my interest is minimal" and Basically Zero" about the most influential composers and performers in the last half century. So why write an article about a subject that you could care less about. Brad? Yes, Brad, there are people "on the other side of the fence" that believe the Beatles were phenomenal. Where just once in pop history, all the hype, hysteria of the mass audience equaled the artistic achievement. Take a listen again, Brad to the 2nd side of Abbey Road. Maybe you will have a reassessment. But one thing you got right Brad, It is an act of Redundancy to remake YELLOW SUBMARINE just like it was to remake The taking of Pelham 123. The originals defined their eras. Remakes are like trying to reheat a souffle. I find anyone suspect that cannot find at least 5 songs from the Beatles catalog they like. These people are probably joyless and wear bow ties like a Right wing conservative talk show host.

- Peter Fasolino
( August 19th, 2009 | 10:12 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

@Paes: You Are Not Alone!

- oldskool138
( August 20th, 2009 | 5:33 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

If he wants to create something in the spirit of the psychedelic 60's, to be inspired by such images from Yellow Submarine and other like features, go ahead. Personally, he should leave this movie alone.

- The Retina's Eye
( August 20th, 2009 | 7:10 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

I'm tired of this stupid Zemeckis 3-D films. If they only had a cool story or script. But they're silly and pointless movies.

- Gastón
( August 20th, 2009 | 4:18 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

This has got to be some elaborate hoax. Remake "Yellow Submarine"? Zemeckis isn't that stupid. Wouldn't put anything past Disney though.

As for negotiating the rights to the songs…well since good ol' Michael Jackson pulled the rug out from under the Beatles by buying their songs when the copyright expired and they've been huckstered in stuff like Nike commercials ever since that shouldn't be a problem.

Yellow Submarine is a stand-alone product of its time. Why not remake Kubrick's 2001 "with new CGI techniques!" while you're at it. In 3D! With Smell-o-Vision!

- Badge
( August 20th, 2009 | 6:43 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #10
Gravatar

… why mess around with The Beatles' stuff?

They've made their mark and shouldn't be attempted to be re-done or altered in any way… leave them alone!

It's like some-one re-making the original Frankenstien film… it's just wrong… (and we all know Frankenstien will be remade at some point… which sickens me)

- Deev
( August 21st, 2009 | 11:49 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!