Filed under: Movie News

Would Someone Finally Destroy Mankind Please!?!?

Aren't we all a bit overdue for a proper Hollywood extinction?

David Frank knows more than you. Care to disagree?

Next Friday Keanu Reeves threatens to scrape Earth free of the entire human race, or at least truckers, football fans and Kathy Bates. Yet, unless the remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still really deviates from the original film, I doubt Reeves floats away in his bowling ball of eco-friendly destruction from a human-free planet. After all, it's a Hollywood studio movie, and while Hollywood studio movies love to occasionally kill billions of humans — preferably with the aid of visceral computer pixels blowing famous landmarks up real good — they never have the pair to finish the job.

In 2009, we get 2012 from the destroyer of worlds and intelligent cinema Roland Emmerich. This guy adores inflicting pain and stupidity on massive groups of people. He practically blew up Earth in Independence Day, froze it to death in The Day After Tomorrow and plans on drowning it Waterworld-style along with some other Mayan madness in 2012. Yet, Emmerich is a pussy. He teases us with human extinction, but never delivers the coup de grâce. And I'm sure half the cast of character actors in 2012 will still have a pulse (and fattened bank accounts) when the credits roll. I'm looking at you John Cusack!

But can you imagine how sweeter Armageddon would have been if right after Bruce Willis heroically declared to the camera "We win," the nuke fizzled out like a match snuffed in ice cream and it only sort of broke apart Michael Bay's steroid asteroid. Damn it we didn't dig deep enough! Thanks Ben Affleck, you just murdered Earth. That's an alternate ending I want to see.

Yet, the studios have to sell tickets, lots of them, to finance these quagillion dollar blockbusters. So concluding them with a body count of 6 billion isn't going to win over the mainstream crowd still fragile from watching Bambi's mama get mowed down by Elmer Fudd.

So my hope lies within smaller, arty films. It's hard to do an apocalypse film on a ramen noodle budget. Yet, not impossible. Oh yes, that film I pimp anytime I possible can (and I wept when its release was delayed), The Road apparently pulled off such a feat. And if it stays true to the book — which from all accounts it does — then I might finally have a movie that makes no concessions regarding humanity's fate: we are goners.

Armageddon
Photo: Touchstone Pictures

It has been a long time coming. Earth's movie humans have survived zombie infestations, global warming, countless alien invasions, dozens of leaky-pus diseases, intergalactic highway projects, talking apes, nuclear wars, nuclear tornadoes, asteroids, comets, pissed-off plants, killer computers, a stalled-out sun, a broken planet core, cross-dimensional collisions, flood-happy deities, infertility and the Wayan brothers. Whatever Hollywood throws at humanity, we take it like champs.

However, I'm tired of watching apocalyptic films where humanity lives to get sequeled another day. I want a film that doesn't welsh on its promise and actually portrays the human species' existence as finite. It's not that I'm a life-hating curmudgeon (okay, I am when shopping at Wal-Mart). It's just that I'm bored of end-of-the-world films with predictable conclusions. Yay, the plant kingdom won't force every man, woman and child in the world to commit hilarious suicides. How dull.

As human beings, we have an innate interest in how this whole spectacle will end. Hollywood caters to that curiosity and packages it as entertainment, which doesn't bother me. Personally, I love the apocalypse genre (unless it involves my buddy Kirk Cameron and the putrid Left Behind series). Watching humanity face obliteration inherently sets up possibilities for interesting drama, complex examinations of human behavior, and rad car chases if you're George Miller.

So, I'm always in when it comes to checking out the latest humanity-is-in-deep-shit flick, especially if it's a last-man-on-Earth story. I'm fascinated by the tale of the person who will turn the lights off. The person has the whole world to themselves, pure freedom, yet no one to share it with it. Well, that's the theory anyways. The subgenre's name is a misnomer. These movies never feature the truly last human on the planet. For the first hour or so they'll try to sell you on the idea. Yet, whether it's the decent, but flawed, I Am Legend or even one of the subgenre's best, such as the cult classic The Quiet Earth, another pesky human always pops up and undercuts the film's last-man marketing premise. And it's always someone of the opposite sex because we can never have too many Adam and Eve allegories.

It's as if the filmmakers have a psychotic parental need to comfort us like we're children awaking from a nightmare about hatchet-wielding goats playing tennis with Gary Busey, who for some goddamn reason won't stop reciting bad emo poetry — common childhood nightmare for me. No son, we humans won't end. Adam will always find his Eve.

Bullshit. If we see a Texas-sized space potato heading towards Earth tomorrow, Bruce Willis will not save us. Nor will NASA, Jesus, your mom, or our magical President Barack Obama. We will simply all die. Hollywood should come to terms with that.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

I'm guessing the "intergalactic highway projects" hints to Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, where the earth is actually completely destroyed.

Yes two humans remain and yes, one is male and one is female, but 2 survivors out of approximately 6,740,000,000 is pretty damned close to extiction I'd say.

I'f that still doesn't make you happy I'd hate to have to go gift shopping for you.
Allthough a Kirk Cameron coffee mug might make you smile.

- rattler76
( December 4th, 2008 | 4:35 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

@rattler76: however, there's a backup Earth in Hitchhiker's and everyone in the world gets replenished and goes on living like nothing happened, so really only during the middle act is humanity on the verge of extinction.

- davidfrank
( December 4th, 2008 | 7:09 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

@davidfrank: ah, either I mist that bit in the film or it's not in there and just in the books which I haven't read.

If thats not in the film my point is still somewhat valid (desperate I know). If it is in the film the flick just wasn't good enough for me to pay attention and notice it.

But how often do films have a bad ending? You can allways count on the main character to survive because the studios think we can't handle it or won't like it.
I remember a recent discussion about that with Australia I believe.
So if that's allready a problem, forget about humanity in its entirety.

And much stranger that mankind surviving no matter what: if millions or billions die, at the end of the movie everyone's happy! Yes you just lost most of your family and friends but if they didn't have big roles in the movie you're celebrating and laughing with the few other survivors.

All together now: "Always look on the bright side of death"

- rattler76
( December 4th, 2008 | 8:36 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

I have been saying this for years to my friends! I hate how there's always a happy ending. When it really does happen, there won't be a happy ending for humans or other animal life.

- Khristopher
( December 4th, 2008 | 9:16 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

Yeah, I'm hate happy endings too.

Speaking of The Road, when the hell will it be released!?…anyone?

- adu
( December 4th, 2008 | 9:37 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

Hollywood never fooled me, I always go to those 'apocalyptic' events movies knowing a miracle will happen at the end and the Earth will be saved or something.
The only movie that actually made me believe it could end with an actual end were Spielberg's War of the World (I hadn't, back then, watched either the original movie or read the book). The whole movie was pointing to an end of the world kinda of thing, right? I really thought the miracle at the end was unnecessary – and a very big and dumb bull**it! 'Look, look, the aliens can't stand this bacteria and are dying! Woo-hoo! THE END!!' :-/ Worst ending ever (to a very good movie, btw).

I don't know why Hollywood thinks the audience can't stand the end of the world.
Come on, the biggest box-office in history ends with one of the biggest tragedies of all time, where 2000 people died, INCLUDING the protagonist!

Even The Dark Knight was (surprisingly) a downer and still made 1 billion!

- Leandro Dubost
( December 4th, 2008 | 10:44 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

Yeah I for some reason like the world eding at the end of these movies. T3 even had a good ending I thought.

- Bryan Baca
( December 4th, 2008 | 8:00 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

That's why Escape from NY and L.A. have the best endings

- zyzygy
( December 4th, 2008 | 10:20 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

I know one really good low-budget apocalyptic film (and it's British!! It takes place in England!! Not in de US!!) that tells a story AFTER the apocalyps, when the army turns out to be (spoiler) as bad as the zombies: 28 Days Later by Danny -Trainspotting- Boyle. Anyone seen this one? Really good article by the way, I really love apocalyptic films, but I really hate the melodramatic ends. Another apocalyptic film by Danny Boyle: Sunshine. Also really good en not melodramatic.

- Jorien
( December 5th, 2008 | 2:31 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #10
Gravatar

I consider myself a cinephile, therefore I take pride in my appreciation and life-long love affair with film. However, deep inside of this stuffy critic lies the heart of a true popcorn, check-your-brain-at-the-door, movie goer. I am a sucker for big-budget-disaster flicks: Armageddon, ID4, Twister, Deep Impact, Titanic – I love 'em all (however, Day After Tomorrow was a big let-down).

Despite my love for the genre (complete with the sappy, hopeful endings), I long for more depth and, dare I say it?, more realism in the genre. I was very impressed by the first 3/4 of War of the Worlds and I Am Legend; however, the gift-wrapped endings were downright ludicrous and laughable.

Give me more endings like Planet of the Apes (humans do not live on, they've been replaced by damn-dirty-apes!) or 28 Days Later. Even the ending to T2 left you wondering about the coming Apocalypse – thats my favorite type of ending to the disaster films: open-ended – humanity might learn….or they might not.

- Josh
( December 5th, 2008 | 2:49 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #11
Gravatar

Honestly, the endings of these movies aren't exactly happy (well, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy was a purely happy ending, but that doesn't really fit into the disaster movie genre). In everyone of the films mentioned the movie leaves off with the world irrevocably changed, most of the times for the worst. Sure, the aliens were defeated after ID4, but most of the large population centers were destroyed along with the people. Countries that didn't collapse will probably collapse later, and with that comes political and economic instability, war, famine… not fun times for the "lucky" few that came out alive. Sure, everyone doesn't die, but they're probably not happy in the traditional sense. The endings are more hopeful than happy – and who doesn't like a bit of hope right?

But if you want a change of pace, watch anime like Evangelion or Space Runaway Ideon. Japan has no problem killing everyone in existence (not just on Earth) – or turning them into orange goo.

- Spacetree
( December 6th, 2008 | 8:23 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!