Filed under: Editorials

Why I'm Not Excited about 'Spider-Man 3'

Too much Aunt May and not enough actual action

Spider-Man 2
Two hours and eight minutes, but really it is two hours and two minutes taking end credits out of the scenario.

Coming in at #10 on the all-time domestic box-office list is Spider-Man 2, which was released in 2004 and grossed $373,585,825. Over at RottenTomatoes this film holds a solid 93% rating (Spider-Man got a 90% rating), even Roger Ebert called this the best superhero movie ever at the time. I wonder if ol' Roger would say the same now after Batman Begins and considering X2 was released the year prior I can't believe he thought Spider-Man 2 was better than that film.

The major problem with Spider-Man 2 is that it is only two hours and eight minutes long, but it feels like it is at minimum two hours and 30 minutes. Of course Aunt May is one of the major reasons this film drags, especially since she is given a different kind of screen time in this film.

Instead of the staggered and quick moments with May in the first film this time we don't get a single visit with Auntie that is less than one minute. Oddly enough her screen time is only one second more than the first film as she gets 14:45 of the 128 minute feature which gives her approximately 12% of the time yet again. Only this time the length of time she is on screen is brutal as she blathers on and on about shit no one wants to hear. Let's take a look:

10:21 – 11:21 (1:00) - It's Peter's birthday! Woo hoo! After Peter has been in the house for approximately 1 nanosecond Aunt May says, "Well say something." How about let me catch my breath woman!

12:23 – 14:26 (2:03) - Uh oh, Aunt May has no money! She is a little behind her payments and considering she doesn't make any money I have no idea how she will get out of her predicament. Maybe a homeless Aunt May will be more entertaining.

OBSERVATION: Twenty-four minutes into this thing and all Spider-Man has done is deliver a pizza and then when he finally comes on screen it is just used as a device to make sure he doesn't make it to Mary Jane's play on time. BRILLIANT!

QUICK QUESTION: How come no one stops for cops in the Spider-Man movies?

46:54 – 48:21 (1:27) - Aunt May is trying to refinance her home and Doc Ock interrupts her transaction, and sorry, no free toaster!

49:50 – 52:46 (2:56) - Aunt May gets kidnapped by Doc Ock. Hey look, the same plot device is being used again.

OBSERVATION: Oh man, an Uncle Ben flashback… this is certainly not needed. Hey Spider-Man is quitting and now Peter Parker is a klutz again. This is all played out with "Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head," which means it is highly annoying.

1:10:01 – 1:13:31 (3:30) - Aunt May and Peter visit Uncle Ben's grave. Aunt May blames herself which makes a lot of sense, had she not been so annoying maybe he would have wanted to stay home more. The scene moves back to May's house where Peter tells her it was his fault. Aunt May freaks out and we can only hope it will be the last we see of her, but I am afraid there is no chance of that being true.

1:21:18 – 1:25:07 (3:49) - Aunt May is moving to an apartment and she tells Peter she loves him, but only because it is integral to the story. Then she gives a long ass speech as to why Spider-Man and heroes are important. Thanks May!

QUICK NOTE: What is up with the odd slow move in on Mary Jane's lips?

I WONDER: Would no one on that subway train really tell who Spider-Man was? I envision everyone running straight to get the police sketch artist and asking for A LOT of money from The Daily Bugle.

See, told you there were fewer different scenes with May, but this time around they were so f'ing long it made the movie drag and drag. She doesn't exactly have a pleasant voice to listen to, and people who tuned in for Spider-Man 2 didn't come to listen to an old wind bag give speeches about heroes, they came to see heroes in action.

All this taken into consideration we come to the May 4, 2007 release of Spider-Man 3

PAGE: 1 2 3
Related post categories: Editorials, Features : , ,

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

This is a really confusing article. If you were sure you didn't like the movies, cool, but why go out of your way to watch them second by second, pausing the film, scratching angry little notes? Proving a point? To whom?

I don't even know why I'm bothering… You liked X2 more… now that's character development.

- jiminyale
( April 20th, 2007 | 5:27 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

Hey jiminyale, not sure if you noticed, but it is an editorial and in order to write it I had to watch the movies. Also, not sure how else there is to watch a movie other than second by second, if you have knowledge of another way please share. Also, if you read it I guess I proved my point to you. Oh, and no need to pause, had the laptop firmly on my lap and typed away as I went. Obviously you liked the movies, that's fine… I may even like the third. Glad you read the article.

- bradbrevet
( April 20th, 2007 | 5:59 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

Dude if you allow yourself to be swayed that much by hype. Giving the movie an A then switching to a C should you really be reviewing movies? All i'm saying is I think your full of SHIT!!!! Brevet

- theb9er
( April 20th, 2007 | 8:59 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

Hey theb9er, actually I am not full of s**t, I am honest in my comments above. The interesting thing is that attacking me doesn't prove any points. Instead try discussing what I said and have an actual argument. I can understand that the Spider-Man movies are precious to many people, I am just being honest. Out of curiosity, is anything I said above untrue? I don't hear anyone disagreeing with me.

- bradbrevet
( April 20th, 2007 | 9:06 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

Ok maybe your right I still think your full of s**t ! no more so than any other movie site these days though

- theb9er
( April 20th, 2007 | 9:11 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

hey man its obvious you don't know anything about movies, you give a D and C to movies nominates to oscars like babel & happy feed, and you give a A to mission impossible 3! omg

- heliam2
( April 21st, 2007 | 12:36 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

I was not the reviewer on Babel, Happy Feet or Mission: Impossible III, so while you think I may not know anything about movies you obviously need help on reading comprehension. However, I will say Happy Feet stunk, Babel was not that good and I loved MI3. Hopefully you realize that being an Oscar nominee does not mean people must like it.

As for theb9er, I am a bit confused as to how I am "full of s**t" please explain, especially if you agree I am right.

- bradbrevet
( April 21st, 2007 | 1:01 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

I gave Babel an F. It was a bad movie that no one watched. It was given an Oscar nom because they're snobs. They don't care if a movie is entertaining, they want you to buy a Babel DVD.

Aunt May sucks the life right out of Spider-Man. That's the takeaway here folks. Sleep on that.

- Laremy
( April 21st, 2007 | 1:39 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

Woah. Did I just hear what I thought I heard?

Ok, First of all. Brad has every right to post this and I was laughing my ass off every minute of it (Nice Jokes Btw Brad) and yet your all calling him Full of Sh*t? Wow! Nice. Last I remembered, When I saw Spiderman in theaters, it was so good I thought it couldn't be better.

Wrong answer. It could've been. You have to watch these things a 2nd time before you really pick up on things that you really didn't enjoy so much. Aunt May Ftl. Thats why I stay away from Audio Commentarys because I know it'l just ruin my seven dollars worth on the dvd.

This is brad/Laremys/Andres/ and many more's website. Let them post whatever they want, besides, Truth tell's me in the past that they are 100% clean with there info.

D866 Out!

- Director866
( April 21st, 2007 | 5:08 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #10
Gravatar

i agree with jiminyale…..

stut up Brad! spider-man is cool the way it is.

- avanishsharma
( April 21st, 2007 | 6:30 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #11
Gravatar

Out of curiosity have you seen Spider-Man 2.1? There's some different takes on some scenes and some extentions and it's a much better film because of it… but I do feel your pain. Aunt May bothers me every time I try and watch the movie again.

I wonder if the Sandman will kidnap her this time? Or maybe Venom… oooh the suspense. Although, I do expect this one to be better as they do progressively get better with each one.

- ShaneM
( April 21st, 2007 | 8:19 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #12
Gravatar

okay, let's try this a different way: who here wants MORE Aunt May? Let's just start there. You huge May fans chime in with how exciting she makes this hero franchise.

- Laremy
( April 21st, 2007 | 12:53 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #13
Gravatar

Nah, skipped Spider-Man 2.1, an extended cut was not what I needed, I need an abridged cut. Oh, and if Sandman or Venom didn't kidnap Aunt May in SM3 I might be disappointed. However, I will say that this one does look like it will be the best of the three, and I hope it is.

As for saying the Spider-Man movies are cool the way they are…? I am happy you like them, I am not saying you can't. I am just stating my opinion.

- bradbrevet
( April 21st, 2007 | 12:57 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #14
Gravatar

Good Lord people, leave Brad alone! So what if he doesn't like the "Spider-Man" movies? It's not gonna kill you. Not like he cares what you think anyways because it's his site – he can post whatever the hell he wants on it. And running a site – especially of this size – is really, REALLY difficult. Brad is doing a great job at keeping it running.

I for one thought this article was hilarious! I always thought Aunt May was kinda annoying, but man, you take that to a new level! Great job on the article and the site Brad!

- SeriouslyFilm
( April 21st, 2007 | 10:36 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #15
Gravatar

I loved MI:3 as well and aunt may can get a little annoying

- theb9er
( April 21st, 2007 | 11:33 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #16
Gravatar

As a smart-ass teenager first, and a movie buff second, I can say that Aunt May really is the worst thing about the Spider-Man movies (even worse than Franco), and that Brad is by no means full of s**t. I too remember seeing the first on opening night when I was in 6th grade, loving it enough to declare it as my favorite movie. Then, when it came out on DVD in November, I watched it the day I got, and have not gone back since. Pretty much the same thing goes for Spider-Man 2. They're movies that are great fun the first time you see them, but they just can't hold up to multiple viewings. That being said, if the soundtrack for Spider-Man 3 that they announced is any indicator, then it's gonna be an ass-kicking movie.

- amnesiac01
( April 22nd, 2007 | 7:21 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #17
Gravatar

Okay, as a fan of the first half of Spiderman and pretty much all of Spiderman 2 … and as a fan of Aunt May (I have all her swimsuit pinups) … I still think this is one of the best articles I've read on this site because

1. it's timely
2. it pisses fan boys off (see postings)
3. it's clever
4. it's fresh and original
5. see posts

I think x2 and spidey 2 are the standard in comic book hero flicks, but come one people. lighten up. this s**t was f**king funny.

- andre
( April 23rd, 2007 | 12:44 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #18
Gravatar

Everyone has a different taste… It is true that you have to watch a movie several times before you can really tell what you liked and what you didn't, but we are talking about a superheroe movie here, so how much can you really ask? they are supposed to be audience-friendly, not master pieces, besides, if you already gave a review, why back out? stick to what you said first. That doesn't speak well of you and the work you're doing.

- elbereth
( April 24th, 2007 | 4:07 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #19
Gravatar

I am not backing out, I am being honest. To say this doesn't speak well of me or my work is crazy talk. I look back at a few other movies out there and wish I had graded them differently. Times change and so do people's opinions. Hard to "stick" to an opinion if you no longer agree with it.

- bradbrevet
( April 24th, 2007 | 5:56 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #20
Gravatar

I totally disagree. You should stick to an opinion even if you now think you're wrong. At no point should you rationally think about something you once decided. That's a sign of weakness. And opinions should never EVER change because then what's the point? If opinions aren't valid for all time then no one should bother having them.

- Laremy
( April 25th, 2007 | 2:31 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!