Filed under: The Shallow End

Welcome to the Dawn of Obamatainment

From out of the dark comes the light...

Can you feel it?

Don't mind the frightening wolves howling outside your door. Just be happy you have a door, even if it's just a flap on your cardboard shack. The world's imploding and we're all hobos now. Even Steven Spielberg has gone panhandling — please Mr. Movie Studio Head-honcho spare some change for my Lincoln bio-pic. Yet, ignore it all. After all, we have hope. And during Sunday's Annual Circle Jerk Celebration of All that is Phony (A.K.A. The Academy Awards), Hollywood didn't let you forget it. It gave you Wolverine announcing the return of the worries-be-damned-it's-all-about-the-glam musical, and then capped the night by handing all the gold to you-just-gotta-have-hope Slumdog Millionaire. I was disappointed President Obama didn't present the award for Best (and Most Hopeful) Picture.

Yes, welcome to the sunny Age of Obamatainment. This year's Academy Awards was the launch party for it. Ding-dong the dark cynicism of the last 8 years is dead. It's passé. Give up the dismal, it's time to get your hope on — boo-yah! — just like you did during the '80s when the country grew fatigued of Nixon-era disillusionment, threw a great communicator into the White House to handle a sputtering economy, and demanded that cinema aim more for the bubble-gum profundity of Zapped!

Slumdog Millionaire
Photo: Fox Searchlight

Hollywood got the memo then — quick, toss some statues at Chariots of Fire, it's inspirational — and they got it now. This year's best picture nominees all have a hopeful edge to them. Slumdog Millionaire not only retells the rags-to-riches story, but it throws the boy-gets-girl standby in the mix too. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button whimsically tells a love conquers all tale. Milk may have a downer of an ending, but it's brimming with hope for the evolution of our culture. Frost/Nixon unfolds in the tradition of the old-as-the-Bible, hope-obsessed yarn of David versus Goliath. And even The Reader has a bizarrely hopeful outlook.*

And that thread of optimism is precisely why The Dark Knight didn't garner any of the major Oscar noms (with the exception of Saint Ledger's). The film, with its Batman on the lam ending, is too much of a negative ninny to have made this year's cut. It's an artifact of the Bush era, in which pessimism ruled. Last year, the Academy Awards tapped out on the bleak vibe by naming a manifesto on nihilism as best picture. No Country for Old Men and its main competition in last year's race, There Will Be Blood, are films that slam, bolt and weld the hatch shut on optimism. They were the apocalyptic crescendo of the doom-drenched misery encompassing the Bush years.

Dubya was a sad lemon of a president, a smug golem who churned out one tragic decision after another like he had a quota to meet… I already miss him. We've lost our bogeyman of a muse. Say what you will about the string of travesties carried out by the carnival geek show that was the Bush administration, but give credit when due: Bush provoked the arts and entertainment industry to step it up over the last 8 years. If art is the expression of reaction, then just about everyone with a pen, camera, or crayon reacted to the daily horror show of the Bush era. We have George W. Bush, the villain**, to thank for nearly a decade's worth of enraged, brilliant satire, comedy, allegory and drama across the spectrum of arts.

Entertainers and artists discussed with outraged zeal the absurd, dark regions of the loathsome America character Bush represented. Whether it was Jon Stewart mocking Bush nightly or nearly every documentary filmmaker in the universe tackling the disastrous consequences of his administration's policy, dissent in the arts thrived over the last 8 years — contrary to the myth that Bush and his cronies had quashed all protest.

Yet, such critical reflection wasn't reserved for cable TV or indie theaters. The cautious wimps of Hollywood rat-stomped Bush too. After all, everyone else was doing it. Despite low box-office returns*** major studios released several films focused squarely on the negatives of the post-9/11 environment (war, torture, you know, the daily grind for the Bush administration). Yet, even the blockbusters, the easily consumable Big Macs of Hollywood, played the whack-a-Bush game. Film reviewers had little problem digging up allegorical parallels to the current geo-political climate within films such as The Village, War of the Worlds, and the Pirates of the Caribbean sequels. Even the freakin' Star Wars prequels took shots at the Bush administration.

Blockbusters depicting a sense of world-awareness veiled by aliens blowing shit up met with varying results. But you couldn't help but smile even at the failures. At the very least, Hollywood was trying to be interesting and subversive in its own mainstream way. And when films weren't intentionally drawing connections to the world according to Bush, they were capturing the national zeitgeist of despondency. Movies were unafraid to go dark. In fact, we wanted films to explore the shadows — culminating in the success of The Dark Knight.

But ahh, how just half a year and a leader with a sanguine vision can change the national mood. We know the world still stinks. But move on. It's time to buck up. Get cheery. It may still be hailing outside, but Obama has given us an umbrella and rose-tinted binoculars. It's only a short matter of time before that attitude fully imbues itself within our arts and entertainment. This year's Oscars shot the opening salvo.

* Unfortunately it's a horribly twisted outlook that conveys an unintentional hopeful message for Holocaust deniers and Nazi sympathizers. Don't play the indignant card. It's a perfectly legit criticism against this messy, incoherent film.

** And just as Jason Voorhees — a silly relic of the '80s — replaced the villainous phantom of Richard Nixon in '70s cinema, is it any surprise he circled back to take over for George W. Bush?

*** While Hollywood could turn out serious films related to the Bush administration's decisions (A.K.A. Iraq War movies), it couldn't market them worth a shit, which I think played more into their poor box-office than a cultural indifference toward them.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

…meanwhile everyone completely forgets that President Bush kept us safe for 7 years. Waterboard, maim, and annihilate all terrorists and all nations who harbor and support them. Like it or not we are at war. America needs to learn how to fight one.

- DarkKnightFAN12
( February 25th, 2009 | 5:11 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

An interesting theory, but how about the fact that the films nominated were just plain good?

Hollywood strives to deliver what they think people want to see. They usually fail, which is why there were so many truly terrible films that came out in 2008. The reaction to 9/11 by the majority of the population made it a target rich environment for Hollywood to pander to our feelings of betrayal for so many years.

But its not some grand conspiracy by the filmmakers to start injecting the unwashed masses with prozac and welbutrin. I think everyone is pretty sick and tired of having to put up with the bullshit of the oval office for so long that they are looking for anything that is a polar opposite to eight years of tyranny, greed and corruption. The films that were nominated were the right ones at the right time. That's all.

Now, on the strength of such messages of hope like Slumdod and even Milk, Its a fair bet that there will be several copycat films that come out in the next few years hoping to ride the coattails of the winning flicks. Expect a lot more similar flicks to be cranked out in short order. Its the nature of the business. That's all.

Hope and positive outlooks are this year's big genre. The fad will fade and people will swing back to wanting to see films of darker and more sinister themes soon enough.

Dark Knight was a good film. Not an Oscar worthy film, but a good one. Box office gross does not translate into winning the award all the time.

- Judge
( February 25th, 2009 | 6:25 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

@Judge:
how was the dark knight not Oscar worthy?
it had more layers and was more subtle about its themes than the Oscar Bait half-assed reader was, that movie had Nazis, shocking nudity, court room drama, crying all the time, it was pretty much a waste, The Wrestler and the Dark Knight should've both been nominated

- thankyoufor
( February 25th, 2009 | 7:18 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

This was a fantastic article. I really enjoyed reading it.

- Ben Pearson
( February 25th, 2009 | 7:32 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

lol! the poster was funny.

- T3H B3AST
( February 25th, 2009 | 10:32 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

I'm sorry, as far as the Oscars go, a couple of issues.

1. The telecast rocked. The glitz, the glam, the return of the big opening musical number!
2. Heath Ledger wins for The Dark Knight. Even in death, his Joker casts a long shadow.
3. Hugh Jackman was a great host – and he's not even a comedian!
4. The movie montage short film starring Seth Rogen & James Franco. Rock on, Judd!!
and some problems

4. The Nominees for Best Picture. Slumdog Millionaire and Milke definitely added some welcome gravitas to the nights proceedings; however, Frost/Nixon – Doubt – The Reader? Are you kidding. They were good films, but not great. Why couldn't the Academy have nominated The Dark Knight, Wall-E & Gran Torino instead? I mean, those films were critical darlings and the public actually went out to see them and turned them into blockbusters. There is a reason why the 1997 & 2004 telecasts were so highly rated: they featured Titanic & Return of the King, two critically hailed and publicly adored films. Get with the program Oscar.

- Quake82
( February 25th, 2009 | 8:00 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

the poster was funny but i still find myself an avid republican! bush did good in the office but people only focused on the bad and i admit he did "drop the ball" on the economy but this is America and we will bounce back from all this crap! and as for the Dark Knight not being oscar worthy…thats BS! I am so glad Heath Ledger won the award for Supporting Actor. He deserved it more than anyone i have ever seen! His performance left audiences mesmerized and wanting more! The whole movie was, for lack of better word, amazing! I did get so ill with Slumdog Millionaire winning EVERY award! But atleast it can only win one year and hopefully next years academy awards will be much better! I still have so much hope in movies and the power they have, despite people saying it has lost magic! I will still pray for Obama and hope for a better America in the near future!

- atl roller`
( February 25th, 2009 | 11:11 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!