Filed under: Movie News

Uhura Casting Rumors and 'Star Trek' Possible Plot?

Please don't tell me it is time travel! PLEASE!

Some new information in regards to the upcoming Star Trek reboot hit the web today in the form of some possible casting news and some plotline rumors.

First off for the casting as TrekMovie.com has learned that 29-year-old actress Zoë Saldana has been offered the part of Uhura – the USS Enterprise’s communications officer originally played by Nichelle Nichols. Saldana played Anamaria in Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl and is starring in James Cameron's Avatar, which TrekMovie points out may be an actual problem. Apparently scheduling surrounding Avatar's production in October, prior to Trek's planned start date in November is throwing a minor wrench in the works. We will just have to wait and see.

As for those possible plot points, this one bothers me a little, even though it doesn't sound like that bad of an idea I am just not a huge fan of time travel stories. For the most part there are so many holes in all time travel stories it isn't even worth digging into and it just feels so played at this point, especially since Ain't It Cool News writer Moriarty refers to this as "Trek to the Future".

Word is that the story could quite possibly be about Spock, Nimoy-aged Spock. Moriarty gives us this little example:

Picture an incident that throws a group of Romulans back in time. Picture that group of Romulans figuring out where they are in the timeline, then deciding to take advantage of the accident to kill someone’s father, to erase them from the timeline before they exist, thereby changing all of the TREK universe as a result. Who would you erase? Whose erasure would leave the biggest hole in the TREK universe is the question you should be asking.

Who else, of course, but James T. Kirk?

If Spock were in a position to change that incident back, and then in a position to guard that timeline and make sure things happen the way they’re supposed to, it creates…

… well, what does it create? Because evidently the plan is to use this second timeline as a way of rebooting without erasing or ignoring canon.

It all makes sense and it really sounds like something that could work. My only problem is that it doesn't sound fresh. It doesn't sound new. It simply sounds like one more voyage of the starship Enterprise, not-so-boldy going somewhere we have seen it pretty much go before.

I have a lot of faith in J.J. Abrams and am hoping for the best with this feature no matter what story they choose. I already know the first time I hear the music come on for the first teaser trailer it is going to get me excited even more.

For the rest of the AICN article click here.

Related post categories: Movie News, Rumor Monger : ,

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Dammit Jim! No time travel!

Seriously, time travel and Trek have been done waaaay to much. Even the temporal police said that in deep space 9 (although, their particular time travel/TOS mashup was the coolest time travel episode ever). It just makes things too "convenient", and if anything Star Trek does have a bit too much Deus Ex Machina from time to time.

- kettch
( August 30th, 2007 | 9:40 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

Yeah, I think I am one of the few and only fans of the "Enterprise" series and they had an entire season dedicated to time travel and the temporal Cold War… Outside of the original series I never got into any of the other offshoots, no TNG, DS9 or Voyager, but with just those two series the time travel bit was a bit over done. After all, we already have a Star Trek time travel movie in "Voyage Home" we don't really need another one.

- bradbrevet
( August 30th, 2007 | 10:11 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

My first thought is this is a false rumor, a planted one. If this were the real plot, a time travel/timeline scheme, getting Shatner into the flick would be a piece of cake…yet everyone seems to think they are struggling with finding a way to include him. Only one of those two scenarios can be true in my head.

- harbor521
( September 4th, 2007 | 9:29 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

I actually heard it is a true plot scenario, and I have always thought the Shatner stuff was sort of a stunt and he will most likely be in it. Also, since the time travel portion seems like it will be from the perspective of another race it wouldn't necessitate Shatner or even Nimoy's involvement… I am not sure exactly how it will all play out. I will admit the killing off of Kirk is interesting, but it seems like a lot more trouble than is necessary when they could have just made it a new crew at a new time, that is just me though…

- bradbrevet
( September 4th, 2007 | 1:43 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!