Filed under: Movie News

Two Part 'Harry Potter 7' with Steven Spielberg?

Okay, this is a rumor gone wild

I have come to trust just about zilch out of most UK newspapers since if it isn't the BBC it really seems to be bunk, but this latest rumor out of the Daily Mail is just too fantastic to ignore. Apparently the cast and crew of the current Potter film, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, have been told that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows wil be shot as two films.

Many of you will remember that rumors such as this persisted during Goblet of Fire and even Order of the Phoenix based on the length of the books and the content of the stories. I for one would love to see "Deathly Hallows", the seventh and final book in the Potter series, turned into two films as long as they were released within a couple months of one another. The story is big, but to drag it out over an extended period of time (more than a month) would be ridiculous. The story, to my recollection, has no recognizeable midway point to which you could cut it off and say "To Be Continued", sort of like how the cut-off point in Matrix Reloaded was sort of a WTF? moment.

The interesting thing the Daily Mail points out from their unnamed sources is that the reason for splitting the two films isn't a monetary one (ha!) instead it is for artistic reasons. Unnamed source goes on to say, "There’s so much to fit that the view is the last movie should be in two halves. There is a huge battle when Harry, played by Daniel Radcliffe, takes on Voldemort that needs to be done really well."

Okay, so do the battle well, but don't turn it into an epic. The battle between Dumbledore and Voldemort in Order of the Phoenix was amazing, but it wasn't two hours long.

As for that Spielberg tease in the headline, the article then goes on to say that big-name directors such as Steven Spielberg are being courted to helm the final film. Uh, that ain't gonna happen either. How about I throw in Clint Eastwood, James Cameron and Martin Scorsese just for the hell of it. As a matter of fact I think I heard from unnamed sources that Uwe Boll and his German financiers were ready to pounce on the final film and were just waiting for the papers to come through. Boll apparently threatened to make Parry Hotter and the Lively Condemnations should he be denied. I mean, who are these sources?

The final quote from the piece comes from a "spokesman" saying, "People are discussing all possibilities." Ha, my source said the same thing! They are discussing stuff. Go figure, it could be the same person!

Get excited about the seventh film coming to theaters but don't put too much stock in silly rumors until we get an actual source.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

I'm sorry but I hate that idea. I agree that the seventh book is long. However there is a way to put this into one script…. to be perfectly honest, I have been working on an adaptation of this book every since it came out this last summer. I found ways to move things around and shorten several unimportant plotlines. There is no need to drag this out any longer than it has to be.
Besides, what are they gonna call the second film? Harry Potter and The Deathly Hollows Part 2? sorry but that is just ridiculous. People just need to get over the fact that things are going to get cut out. There are certain rules for adapting a book into a screenplay and the pacings are completely different. Warner Brothers just needs to grow a pair and let the movie unfold on its own, the fans will always find something to complain about; its too long, its not long enough, too much talking, not enough action, or too little of either, they need to make a FILM decision based on what will be the best image for their most profitable movie of 2010, cause let's face it, its going to be.

- sinisterfilmz
( January 14th, 2008 | 9:44 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

Sorry, P.S. i hope to god David Yates returns, he has the perfect direction for these movies, the last three books are so dark and yet so full of hope and he knows how to balance the two.

- sinisterfilmz
( January 14th, 2008 | 9:47 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

Sorry, I gotta disagree, I think there is no way to properly do Deathly Hallows without it being 2 movies. I pray they make it two films. Sure some of the walking around in the woods can be montaged, but otherwise it's a really plot-driven book that has important bigass set-pieces in every other chapter. Unlike Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix, Hallows doesn't have a lot of filler. Plus I want the final film it to be an epic spectacle. I want the final battle to be 45 minutes long. I want this movie to kick ass. And while I like what David Yates did with Phoenix, my dream director would be Alfonso Cuaron. Besides the fact that he did the 3rd movie, Deathly Hallows is similar to the road-trip structure of Children of Men, and as that movie proved Cuaron is a master at depicting fierce battles, not to mention giving us great character work and several layers of complex themes without a heavy hand.

- davidfrank
( January 14th, 2008 | 11:50 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!