Filed under: Editorials

'The Golden Compass', Catholics, Atheists and Ignorance

Philip Pulman must just sit back and laugh at all of this

New Line has gone to a great expense to bring this story to the big screen. The budget has been reported to be anywhere from $150-180 million, and then there is this whole "getting around the anti-religion" aspect of the campaign. New Line understands that it wasn't all the non-Christians that went out and earned Passion of the Christ $370 million at the domestic box-office and over $610 million worldwide. As "The Atlantic" puts it, "the studios now seem to view the Christian market as it would a difficult girlfriend: elusive and hard to please; ultimately, you keep your distance but still take pains not to irritate her."

The second and third films in the "His Dark Materials" franchise have yet to be greenlit as New Line is waiting to see how well The Golden Compass does. This is probably the main reason they dropped "His Dark Materials" from the title early on, so as not to jump the gun, because while the first book may have lent itself to an adaptation that was easy enough to rid it of the anti-religious elements it is going to get a little trickier as things go along.

As much as Pullman is hated as an atheist he seems to know an awful lot about Christianity and the Bible; a well studied thinker would be a better description in my estimation. In fact the most interesting and altogether impressive story element that I came across in my research is that the story of the central character in the trilogy, Lyra (played by newcomer Dakota Blue Richards in the film). Lyra's story is not only an action/fantasy, but a coming-of-age story assumed to be a rewriting of the Bible's Genesis, with Lyra replaying the role of Eve.

From what I can tell, the trilogy culminates in a sexual awakening for 12-year-old Lyra in the final book. Yes, there are epic battles (presumable Heaven vs. Earth). Yes, a figure referred to as God does die. Oh, and Lyra apparently engages in an ambiguous "kiss" with a young man named Will serving as her sexual awakening and first step into adulthood.

If you are wondering whether or not the figure killed at the end of "Amber Spyglass" really is God, assume what you will from this excerpt taken from ChristianPost.com:

In the final book of the series, "The Amber Spyglass," "God" is portrayed as a phony and liar. Will is told by two fallen homosexual angels that "The Authority" goes by many names including, "God, the Creator, the Lord, Yahweh, El, Adonai, the King, the Father, the Almighty," although "he was never the creator." "God" was just the first angel to be created from "Dust." By the series' end, the characters succeed in killing him.

Now, from what I have read, Pullman doesn't necessarily disagree with the idea of God or a higher power, he seems to only disagree with the thought that God is a guy with a beard running things in the sky. If I have my story straight, it is this idea of God that dies, not the idea of something greater than us. Pullman has been quoted in interviews questioning "Who created the universe?" "What are we here for?" and "What happens when we die?" I can relate to Pullman and these questions. I have had long discussions with friends, religious and atheists both, on these same subjects. One side never providing evidence of their beliefs (this is usually called "faith") and the other just left wondering and moderately satisfied in not knowing (you guess which is which).

I was raised Lutheran, but all this hatred Christians, Catholics and all organized religions seem to have for those with differing opinions has really made me reconsider (Tom Cruise anyone?). Oddly enough the Catholic League is responding to Pullman's books exactly how the Magisterium reacts to Dust in his stories. You would think they would have a little more sense than that. On top of that, from what I can tell, Pullman's books aren't about leading a life of sin in as much as they are about free will and leading a fulfilling life on Earth. This is where the reverse story of Eve comes into play, and it is an interesting one. Why would anyone be opposed to people leading virtuous lives, no matter what their belief system is? Why do people get so offended?

While religious opinion in the film adaptations seems relatively safe for now, the killing of a higher power and a final plot point involving the young Lyra and a gentleman named Will are sure to prevent obstacles for screenwriters should The Golden Compass succeed and the sequels are greenlit.

PAGE: 1 2 3
Related post categories: Editorials, Features :

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

great article brad. really looking forward to seeing how this one pans out but I can't help thinking that the grand ideas were what made the books so great – kind of provided the emotional linchpin to the whole world for me. not sure that a watered down version of this was exactly what the world needed.

- oliversourpuss
( November 28th, 2007 | 9:16 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

Since I am myself a Catholic, I can honestly say that I support the Catholic League's position. If you're not Catholic or Christian (by the way, it isn't only Catholics boycotting this film), or if you just don't care, get over it and move on. How is this boycott going to hurt you personally?

- loveAlot83
( November 29th, 2007 | 12:14 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

It doesn't hurt me personally, but I can still have an opinion. However, based on the Catholic League's comments I am assuming that if my opinion doesn't match their's then it must be wrong.

I am curious though, are you one of the people boycotting the film because you saw it and disapprove? Have you even read the books?

- bradbrevet
( November 29th, 2007 | 1:45 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

Actually, I have read The Golden Compass. Have you read the Catholic League's brochure? Now, since I am a normal movie goer, and not a critic, I cannot see the movie ahead of its release. I'm sure Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig and all the cast are charming; I'm sure it's well acted, produced, written, everything. But that does not have to mean that I agree with its inherently atheistic message and I do have the right to be offended by Phillip Pullman's insulting remarks about people who he's never even met (ie, me, a Catholic). The Catholic League can ask fellow Catholics to support their church's image, as any other church would do if their image was being tarnished. There's no harm in that, is there?

- loveAlot83
( November 29th, 2007 | 4:24 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

Here is the problem; you are judging something before you see it, and to ask if there is "harm" in it is silly and an unfair question. As long as you aren't hurting anyone there is no harm in it, no, but that is hardly the issue. If you are looking for reassurance that you can have your boycott then you have my blessing. I just wish it was a researched boycott rather than an ill informed one. If you have a problem with the books then boycott the books, but to bash another piece of work before you have seen it, and therefore have no basis, is ridiculous.

Answer me this, how is The Golden Compass (THE MOVIE) tarnishing your church's image?

- bradbrevet
( November 29th, 2007 | 4:50 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

This is such a good argument! (Really, no hard feelings, Brad, because I enjoy this site and your other articles very much.) First of all, is the movie so different from the book that the messege is different? If the movie is not different, then yes, I can judge it before I see it. If, however, the movie has a totally different meaning and messege than the book, then we have something else. But aside from being "watered down," the references to the Church are still there. It doesn't take much to figure out that the "Magesterium" is supposed to be the Catholic Church, and that is what offends people and tranishes Catholic reputation. If, for example, Scientology or any other religion was being insulted, they would probably boycott the film too. It has nothing to do with telling you what to believe in, but a request from Catholics to Catholics to take a stand for their religion.

- loveAlot83
( November 29th, 2007 | 6:37 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

To me, the basic problem with staging a boycott of this film is that, if it is in fact 'watered down', then most people wouldn't have had any clue that it was anti christian or catholic. I was also raised Lutheran and wouldn't have known that the Magesterium had anything to do with Catholics at all if it hadn't all come out in this controversy. Nor would I have had any idea what the underlying themes were supposedly representing. I personally like to just watch a film and, if it's good, think about it and analyze it on my own terms. I had the same problem with all the pro-Narnia pub from Christians that went around before its release.

- CaliPunkRockGrl
( November 30th, 2007 | 1:25 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

Exactly CaliPunkRockGrl, when loveAlot83 says, "It doesn't take much to figure out that the Magesterium is supposed to be the Catholic Church," that is only directed at those that have read the book and have made that connection already. Anyone going into this movie fresh will not make that assumption. As I watched the movie the first time I had already heard about this controversy and was able to see a little bit more into the story that Philip Pullman originated, but there is nothing for the Catholic League to point their fingers at.

As fr judging a film on your own terms, this is what the Catholic League does not want you to do. They have judged the film for you and tell you it is not good. Ironically this whole thing can be compared to the way the Magesterium acts in the movie, trying to tell everyone what is good for them and banning what they believe to be bad.

This is why it confuses me how people can support the Catholic League's decision as none of them have seen the film.

- bradbrevet
( November 30th, 2007 | 2:54 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!