<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RopeofSilicon.com Movie News, Trailers, Reviews and More &#187; Titanic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/tag/titanic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:09:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Critics Have Little-to-Nothing To Do With Box-Office Success</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/critics-have-little-to-nothing-to-do-with-box-office-success</link>
		<comments>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/critics-have-little-to-nothing-to-do-with-box-office-success#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Brevet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reactionary Causes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=17821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people say a movie is &#034;critic-proof&#034; it really doesn&#039;t mean anything since reviews for movies have very little to do with determining whether or not the majority of people are going to go see a movie. With that said, what is published in David Germain&#039;s AP story &#034;&#039;Transformers&#039;: Worst-reviewed $400 million hit?&#034; means absolutely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/critics-have-little-to-nothing-to-do-with-box-office-success/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I Don&#039;t Like the &#039;Adjusted for Inflation&#039; Box-Office Argument</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/why-i-dont-like-the-adjusted-for-inflation-box-office-argument</link>
		<comments>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/why-i-dont-like-the-adjusted-for-inflation-box-office-argument#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Brevet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gone with the Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gran Torino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/?p=12696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino
Photo: Warner Bros.


On Friday I posted the Friday box-office estimates and inside of it I said how Gran Torino will become Clint Eastwood&#039;s highest grossing film of all-time, ahead of In the Line of Fire. Of course, the very first comment that comes in comes from Allan saying, &#034;Adjusting for inflation, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/why-i-dont-like-the-adjusted-for-inflation-box-office-argument/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Mamma Mia!&#039; is the UK&#039;s Highest Grossing Film of All-Time?</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/mamma-mia-is-the-uks-highest-grossing-film-of-all-time-_20081105</link>
		<comments>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/mamma-mia-is-the-uks-highest-grossing-film-of-all-time-_20081105#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Brevet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box-Office News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mamma Mia!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Meryl Streep in Mamma Mia!
Photo: Universal Pictures


BBC recently proclaimed Mamma Mia! as the highest-grossing film of all time in England even though it still had $5 million more to make to match Titanic&#039;s $138 million gross.

The article, posted October 31, recognizes Mamma Mia! as earning $133 million at the English box office as it enters [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/mamma-mia-is-the-uks-highest-grossing-film-of-all-time-_20081105/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leonardo DiCaprio Has Been Solid for Six Straight Years</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/leonardo_dicaprio_has_been_solid_for_six_straight_years_20081013</link>
		<comments>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/leonardo_dicaprio_has_been_solid_for_six_straight_years_20081013#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Brevet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Diamond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body of Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catch Me if You Can]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gangs of New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo DiCaprio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Aviator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Departed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read Erin Nolan&#039;s &#034;Leonardo DiCaprio: Top Five/Bottom Five&#034; at Film.com (yes, that&#039;s me over there as the first commenter) and I started thinking about how a top ten Leonardo DiCaprio films may be a good list to make, and one I could hammer out relatively quick. Then I took at look at DiCaprio&#039;s filmography [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/leonardo_dicaprio_has_been_solid_for_six_straight_years_20081013/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sam Jackson&#039;s Lost &#039;Titanic&#039; Audition Tape Surfaces</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/sam_jacksons_lost_titanic_audition_tape_surfaces</link>
		<comments>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/sam_jacksons_lost_titanic_audition_tape_surfaces#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Brevet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel L. Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wondered what Titanic would have been like had Samuel L. Jackson played the role of Jack rather than Leonardo DiCaprio?
 Well wonder no longer, the lost screen test with Jackson auditioning for the role has risen from the depths&#8230;



]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/sam_jacksons_lost_titanic_audition_tape_surfaces/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Mummy&#039; Poised to Spoil &#039;Dark Knight&#039; Reign with Friday Box-Office Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/mummy_poised_to_spoil_dark_knight_reign_with_friday_box_office_lead</link>
		<comments>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/mummy_poised_to_spoil_dark_knight_reign_with_friday_box_office_lead#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Brevet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box-Office News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mamma Mia!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midnight Meat Train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Chimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Step Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swing Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The X-Files: I Want to Believe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WALL-E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Man, skeletons really don&#039;t make for a very good army&#8230; too fragile!
Photo: Universal Pictures


It is already grown wearisome to see the same tired headline &#034;Will Dark Knight Sink Titanic Record?&#034; Come on, let&#039;s use our brain here folks. Titanic played in an era where it held box-office supremacy for 17 WEEKS and grossed over $600 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/mummy_poised_to_spoil_dark_knight_reign_with_friday_box_office_lead/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
