Filed under: Production Update

'Sin City 2' Searches for a New Home?

Will the long gestating sequel ever see the light of day?

Fan made 'Sin City' art

Back in early April IESB brought word The Weinstein Company had lost the rights to Sin City 2, the sequel to the 2005 Dimension Films hit based on the Frank Miller graphic novels.

Shortly after the news hit Entertainment Weekly posted a follow-up to the story with a quote from Weinstein Co. lawyer Bert Fields saying, "The Weinstein Co's rights to produce sequels to Sin City remain intact as they always have been. Any suggestion to the contrary is complete hogwash."

I never reported on the story since it seemed like a non-story and, for what it's worth, it still is barely news, but now The Hollywood Reporter gives me incentive to finally talk about it as they are now saying the rights to Sin City 2 "are being shopped around Hollywood, in what appears to be a sign that Dimension Films has lost rights to the property."

The report from Borys Kit and Steven Zeitchik says Weinstein Co./Dimension still hold the rights to the property, but producers say they have been shopped the rights by reps for Miller's estate, who they say are seeking a new place to set up a potential follow-up.

The THR article suggests the Weinstein's option may have lapsed due to inactivity or a decision not to pay to re-up, but considering it has now been four years since the first film brought in over $158 million worldwide on a $40 million budget I would think someone would be chomping at the opportunity to try and duplicate the first film's success.

Talk of Sin City 2 has never really gone away, though, and even recently Moviehole brought back up the long held rumor that Angelina Jolie is still up for the role of Ava Lord saying she is in "serious talks" for the part. I wonder who she was talking to if the report is legit, but it seems fans may still get their return trip to Sin City.

Some of you may also be interested in the recently released Sin City Blu-ray, which I reviewed right here and you can buy for yourself right here.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Angelina Jolie ruined any chance of Sin City 2 getting made when they first started talking about doing a sequel so I say forget her! Who cares if she is ready now??? She has already ruined it!!!!

- Tyler C
( April 22nd, 2009 | 3:56 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

@Tyler C: Hmmmmm, not quite sure I follow. What are you basing this on?

- Brad Brevet (Post Author)
( April 22nd, 2009 | 3:58 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

The reason Sin City 2 wasn't made when they originally wanted was because Rodriguez wanted Jolie to play Ava Lord and since she was preggo at the time they decided to wait. They waited and waited and then the idea went away as Rodriguez and Miller moved on to other projects. Even Mickey Rourke got tired of planning his future around the hope of Sin City 2. So now Marv will most likely have to be recast so that Jolie can be in the movie. I would have been satisfied with a terrible Rose McGowan Ava if I knew Rourke was gonna bail. Rodriguez has so many other projects in the works that Miller is probably gonna have to step up and direct it himself. And being a Frank Miller fan I don't see that as a problem. (I somewhat enjoyed The Spirit and I've followed him as an author for a few years now) I fell in love with Sin City since I read the graphic novels and then the movie…WOW so having a sequel see the light of day is kind of a touchy subject to me.

- Tyler C
( April 22nd, 2009 | 5:29 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

@Tyler C: Ah, I remember what you are talking about and even actually wrote about it back in 2006. However, I highly doubt that was the only reason since Jolie was never even officially attached.

- Brad Brevet (Post Author)
( April 22nd, 2009 | 5:39 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

After pulling in 74 million at the box office you would think that they would want to hurry up and make the sequel. I can't think of any other logical reason they wouldn't want to make it except Rodriguez's strange fixation with one certain female as the desired character. (exp. Rodriguez's decision to make something like 5 movies with McGowan…) He wanted his Dame to Kill For and he didn't want to do it without her. Especially in the prime of her career. How selfish.

- Tyler C
( April 22nd, 2009 | 5:45 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

I want them to film Sin City 2 now so they can start on the third installment which features Johhny Depp!

- bryce
( April 22nd, 2009 | 9:31 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

I don't get the hype over Depp. I like the fact that he's branching out with "Public Enemies" (Which I'm looking forward to a great deal) but I feel like his career is built on two types of people: "The quirky 'out there' guy" and "Keith Richards". The role he's up for in "Sin City" would be something different for him but I'm not sure he's the guy for that part.

Sorry for going off topic on that but Depp gets thrown around for EVERY role and it makes no sense to me.

As for Sin City 2, I have to believe someone out there wants this license. The first one made it's money back and plenty more and it represents a really cutting edge style in movies. I never liked the Weinstein's business plans (I'm STILL waiting for "The Road") so I'm happy to see them off the project. Hopefully a studio like Warner Brothers or Lionsgate, a place that gives it's artist real creative license, picks it up.

- Trevor
( April 23rd, 2009 | 12:29 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!