Filed under: Editorials

The Shallow End: Who Broke ‘The Golden Compass’?

Telling you now... Don't credit the Catholics

Stamp the official box-office-dud seal now: The Golden Compass bombed so bad it makes New Line Cinema look like the Enola Gay. And of course everyone and their daemon are pointing fingers every which way they can. Yet, what twists my gonads the most are the jackasses taking credit for The Golden Compass‘ box-office mushroom cloud. That’s right, I speak of the Catholic League - the knee-jerk, think-police organization boycotting The Golden Compass in four-alarm panic because the kiddies might question God’s existence when confronted with the godlessness that is Nicole Kidman’s plastic mug and everything it comes with (see Brad’s astute dissection of this topic by clicking HERE).

Really, it’s no shocker the Catholic League is pretending to have slit the throat of the 7-headed, 10-horned, $250 million budgeted beast - just to postpone Armageddon for another day so us sinners have more time to repent (thank you Catholic League, you’re ooooh so heroic and thoughtful). The organization and its leader Bill Donahue are top-tier, second only to Paris Hilton publicity whores, the dirty suck-for-a-buck publicity whore.

Here’s a bit of cookie-fortune wisdom: As long as an entertainment product is widely available, controversy can and will sell it. Ask Mel Gibson and Michael Moore. Yet, this thing with the Catholic League and The Golden Compass felt like a minor dustup compared to the media shit storms over The Passion of The Christ and Fahrenheit 9/11. So the hullabaloo surrounding the film probably produced neutral results. A few avoided the movie, and a few were drawn to it because of the boycott. So while New Line execs are dropping bullets in the chamber and mapping a shot trajectory for their skulls, their thoughts must be obsessing over the “What If?”

“What if we had had just anonymously contributed some marketing dollars to the Catholic League’s boycott? Why that would have guaranteed $50 million on opening weekend.” BAM!!! Splat!! Thud! And Douche bag Donahue gleefully grabs credit for the mass suicide at New Line.

Seriously, the Catholic League causing The Golden Compass‘ crash is like holding Al-Qaeda accountable for the 10 nickels Lions for Lambs, Rendition and In the Valley of Elah made altogether. It’s a bullshit argument, plain and simple.

Give me a well-tailored suit, a shoddy toupee, a 7-figure salary, and let me play Mr. Studio Exec for a moment, one with a brain that is, so I can tell you what went wrong with The Golden Compass. It wasn’t the Catholic League nor the lack of bankable stars (sorry Danny Craig, I love yah, but James Bond is a moneymaker, you aren’t and neither are you Ms. Kidman and as The Invasion proved in August, you two definitely aren’t when put together). Sure as shit had nothing to do with its release date. And no, the fantasy genre is not dead. It’s a pretty simple reason actually: a piss-poor trailer and a piss-poor movie.

A film’s success is built upon a 4-prong structure: release date/competition (the most mysterious element to nail); star power (having a star doesn’t guarantee a dump truck of Benjamins - unless it’s Will “$76.5 Million” Smith who could open Phone Book: The Movie to $50 mil - but it doesn’t hurt, after all, my mother will go to any movie with Denzel Washington and I’ll pay to see anything with Bronson Pinchot); film quality (I know I know, tons of shitty movies make more cash than a college bookstore, but excellent movies tend to have strong legs); marketing (a good trailer is ultimately the most important element for box-office victory). Yes, a few other mitigating factors can drop or boost a film’s box-office potential, but those four cover the bulk, and a movie probably needs at least two of these ingredients for some bank.

Of those four, The Golden Compass only had the noncompetitive release date working for it. However, the low star wattage isn’t a big deal when it comes to fantasy epics. So that leaves the film’s quality and marketing as suspects.

Let’s look at the trailer. Before the New Line logo even appears, one-third of the preview is awkward exposition setting up the rules of the world - witches, polar bears, and animal souls, oh my! Then, there’s a disjointed transition into dialogue-heavy scenes of Kidman and the astonishingly unlikable Dakota Blue Richards (I really don’t get why the most negative reviews still give her kudos) scored with a soft, generic score. Next we see Kidman’s nasty baboon dishing out a weird-ass beat down. And the rest of the trailer is a muddle of boring dialogue, platitudes and unconvincing CGI (for $250 million, you’d think the filmmakers could give us something more realistic than Coke Cola polar bears with rabies). Bottom line: the trailer is a mess.

Fellowship of the Ring wrote the playbook on selling a complex fantasy epic. Simplify the exposition (evil doers seek a ring that’ll bring darkness over the world; luckily the good guys have found it). Tell us the stakes (destroy the ring or we’ll all die). Reiterate what’s at stake (seriously, destroy that ring or we’re screwed). Give us money shots and exciting dialogue galore (”You shall not pass!!!!), all scored to bombastic trailer music.

Honestly, that’s a sound method in selling almost any event film. The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe followed it perfectly and rolled in a zillion dollars, so why in the hell didn’t New Line execute the tried and true blueprints they created 6 years ago? Other than being a tonal mess, the trailer doesn’t sell us very hard on what’s at stake - freedom or something? It’s a total “meh” feeling.

And “meh” was exactly the response come opening weekend. “Meh” to the tune of $25 million. Um yeah, not good for a $250 million tent-pole flick. But contrary to popular belief, those sorts of numbers don’t necessarily spell d-o-o-m; remember now, Titanic opened to less than $30 million. If director Chris Weitz had actually made a stirring film, as opposed to the choppy snore-a-rama we got, word of mouth would have perhaps created legs. And maybe we’d be talking about the already arrived viral marketing for The Subtle Knife. Unfortunately, critics and audiences agreed on the movie’s high level of suckitude, which translates to a number such as 65% second weekend box-office drop, and that my friend spells d-i-s-a-s-t-e-r when your quarter-billion dollar investment only scratched $25 million bucks the weekend before.

Will New Line survive after this? Who knows? Assuming they have any cash left some good could come of “The Great Golden Compass Implosion” of 2007. Maybe, just maybe, New Line might pay what it owes Peter Jackson and pals for The Lord of the Rings and then hand over every remaining dime to Jackson so he can get The Hobbit made in time to save the studio. That’s me being optimistic. Very optimistic. More than likely New Line will go the way of Orion, and The Hobbit will be directed by Len Wiseman (now that’s a boycott I could get behind).

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

What I don’t understand is: How can liberals in the U.S. muster up such hatred for Christians, and Catholics, while not seeing the true threat of Muslims who want them dead?

- iydgiydgi
( December 18th, 2007 | 4:25 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

To say that all Muslims want Americans dead is wrong on so many levels I am not even sure it is worth getting into.

- bradbrevet
( December 18th, 2007 | 5:52 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

Where did "iydgiydgi" say that "all Muslims" want to see "Americans" dead?

- Ray from MN
( December 18th, 2007 | 2:42 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

Ray from MN said: Where did "iydgiydgi" say that "all Muslims" want to see "Americans" dead?

Where did I ever say I hate Christians of the Catholic variety (which by the way, I am a Catholic) to even illicit such a response, and even better than that, what do Muslims hating on Christians have anything to do with The Golden Compass? I took swipes at the Catholic League, a think-police, publicity-loving organization that I feel falsly presents itself as the lay Catholic voice of America. My dislike is for the organization, not the religion. It’s called nuance.

Also as for as I know neither Phillip Pullman or Chris Weitz are Muslims, nor do I believe either has publicly announced their "hatred" for Christians. When confrontated with an argument that runs contrary to their beliefs, why do some people instantly break out the simplistic reaction that this supposed "attack" stems from something as emotional as HATRED rather than it being a simple Intellectual Difference of Thought?!?!? Oh wait, pesky nuance again.

- davidfrank
( December 18th, 2007 | 8:23 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

Then please make your statements clearer next time. I also thought that you were criticizing Catholics or something.

- cxjiek
( March 13th, 2008 | 10:23 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

cxjiek said: Then please make your statements clearer next time. I also thought that you were criticizing Catholics or something.

Maybe you should [I]read more carefully
[/I] next time.

My only criticism is directed towards the Catholic League, a knee-jerk reactionary, publicity smitten organization (with no official ties to the Vatican) that tries to speak for Catholics as a whole (something that my liberal Catholic family finds distasteful to say the least). I make my thoughts regarding the Catholic League rather explicit. At no point with in the body of the column do I mention "Catholic" without the word "League" following it. Nor do I make any attacks on the Pope, the Vatican or just your average Catholic. It’s all directed at the Catholic League and its spokesman Bill Donohue. And to attack the Catholic League is Not an attack on all Catholics.

- davidfrank
( March 13th, 2008 | 11:46 am )
Reply to this comment
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
ADVERTISEMENT
This film is going to be a bust or a blast
Creator of 'The O.C.' and 'Gossip Girl' gets mutant gig
'Narnia' scribes pull duty on 'The First Avenger'
The original wasn't even all that good
Mickey is easily the front-runner and some more early Oz reviews arrive
Will Cruise ever step out of the shadow he created for himself?
Sounds like its a winner... for the most part
You ever think they are just trying to piss the guy off?
'WALL-E' and 'Tropic Thunder'... a pair of must buys!
Definitely the best new film release of 2008 on home video
ADVERTISEMENT
It's quite simple, this movie is fantastic
Fan or not, this could be entertaining
'Religulous' is not one of them
It's here, whatcha think?
Will the first review start a trend?
I can't tell if I am excited for this movie or not
The next flick The Rock is cookin'
I just can't remember which Muppet he looks like!
Yup, I somehow came up with ten of them
I just can't stop messing with this site...
Top critics can't seem to figure out the new Bond
Writing gigs getting filled all over the place
Will it be an Oscar juggernaut?
'Dark Knight' may be dark, but 'Watchmen' is really dark
James Bond delivers $70 million!