hot movie previews > The Twilight Saga: E...NineArmoredRemember MeAvatarThe Last SongLegion
 

Redford Conspires to Direct Abe Lincoln Assassination Pic

Guess that does it for Spielberg's venture...

Steven Zeitchik at the Risky Biz Blog reports Robert Redford is set to direct The Conspirator, a film telling the story of Mary Surratt, alleged conspirator of Abraham Lincoln assassin John Wilkes Booth. One would have to assume this would effectively put the kibosh on Steven Spielberg's long-gestating Lincoln biopic as he trundles off to direct aliens in the jungle sequels and remakes old classics. Too bad, with Liam Neeson in the lead and a script from Tony Kushner that film sounded extraordinarily promising, but I just don't see Hollywood taking a risk on duplication in this economic climate. Last thing I would expect Spielberg and his new DreamWorks money to do would be to take a risk on playing second-fiddle.

Anyway, back to the subject at hand, The Conspirator was penned by James Solomon, the writer and exec producer on the ESPN-original series New York Yankees tale "The Bronx is Burning," and rumor has it James McAvoy is said to be at the top of the list for one of the lead roles. McAvoy, coincidentally, also just joined the cast of I'm With Cancer opposite Seth Rogen for director Nicole Holofcener (Friends With Money). That film is an adaptation of the Will Reiser novel in which a 25-year-old (McAvoy) learns he has cancer and successfully battles the disease over several years.

Zeitchik gives us the following rundown of the Surratt story:

A Washington D.C. boardinghouse owner who sympathized with the Confederates, she was allegedly part of the plot to kill Lincoln, supplying Wilkes Booth and his accomplice David Herold weapons at her tavern after the assassin had shot the president at Ford's Theater.

Surratt's son John was also alleged to be part of the conspiracy. Mary Surratt was eventually convicted and hanged for conspiring to kill the president; her son went on the lamb and eventually was put on trial but was never convicted, living until 1916.

The period immediately after the Lincoln assassination was considered extremely volatile, with the country on the cusp of again falling into civil war; that period will provide a backdrop to the Redford-helmed tale.

This film will mark Redford's follow-up to the 2007 politically charged bust Lions for Lambs. Prior to that, his last film was The Legend of Bagger Vance in 2000.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

This story sound promising, despite the fact that Robert Redford is really not an interesting director. But it does not come as a big surprise that Spielberg decides against Lincoln, because he´s a small simple boy at heart. Now he all he wants to to do is compete with the young boys he helped raise, the industry-killing Michael May and such. His years of greatness are of the past. No more Jaws or Close Encounters or ET (his truely great masterpieces) and no more Munchen, his last movie worth mentioning. This is of no small consequence. If a director with Spielberg´s clout cannot make „risky“ movies of his own liking no one can and the industry is finally for ever locked dead and soulless in the hands of bankers.

- Helgi
( August 18th, 2009 | 6:21 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

It's "on the lam".

- oldskool138
( August 18th, 2009 | 6:22 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

Was Eastwood ever a candidate to direct the film?

- BR
( August 18th, 2009 | 11:09 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

Wow, is it really that cool to hate Spielberg? What has he done to deserve such venom from commentators? Indy 4 wasn't a bad movie, people!

- Kevin Klaw
( August 18th, 2009 | 11:46 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

John Ford had covered similar territory – the 'other side' of the assassination – with his excellent 'The Prisoner of Shark Island', worth checking out. I don't think it necessarily nullifies Spielberg's version – from what I've heard his film isn't a birth-to-death encompassing biopic. But if it means getting 'Interstellar' one step closer I'm in favour of shelving it.

- Badge
( August 18th, 2009 | 6:08 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

@oldskool138: Yes, and it's " fall BACK into Civil War."

- Patricia
( August 19th, 2009 | 5:40 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!