<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;Quantum of Solace&#039; Quick Commentary and 28 New Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/quantum_of_solace_quick_commentary_and_28_new_images_20081030/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/quantum_of_solace_quick_commentary_and_28_new_images_20081030</link>
	<description>The best and latest movie news, reviews, features and editorials - updated daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:21:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bradbrevet</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/quantum_of_solace_quick_commentary_and_28_new_images_20081030#comment-3856</link>
		<dc:creator>bradbrevet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10626#comment-3856</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;RaTTleR_NL said:&lt;/b&gt; But is it still a Bond-film?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Definitely still a Bond film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>RaTTleR_NL said:</b> But is it still a Bond-film?</p></blockquote>
<p>Definitely still a Bond film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaTTleR_NL</title>
		<link>http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/quantum_of_solace_quick_commentary_and_28_new_images_20081030#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>RaTTleR_NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news/?p=10626#comment-3853</guid>
		<description>But is it still a Bond-film?

The old ones are still a lot of fun to watch mostly because of the enormous chees-factor.
The gadgets (allthough they started to get out of controll, think invisible car), the different girl every 5 minutes, the mad uber-villains (mono-rail WOOHOO!), etc. etc.

As you said its a Bourne world now so those things wouldn&#039;t work anymore but with just a secret agent called Bond, an employer called M and a pretty girl, can you still consider it a proper Bond film?

I liked Casino Royal and I can&#039;t wait to see Quantum but are they moving away to much from the Bond world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is it still a Bond-film?</p>
<p>The old ones are still a lot of fun to watch mostly because of the enormous chees-factor.<br />
The gadgets (allthough they started to get out of controll, think invisible car), the different girl every 5 minutes, the mad uber-villains (mono-rail WOOHOO!), etc. etc.</p>
<p>As you said its a Bourne world now so those things wouldn&#039;t work anymore but with just a secret agent called Bond, an employer called M and a pretty girl, can you still consider it a proper Bond film?</p>
<p>I liked Casino Royal and I can&#039;t wait to see Quantum but are they moving away to much from the Bond world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
