hot movie previews > The Twilight Saga: E...NineLegionArmoredRemember MeKick-AssSalt
 

Overlooked Greatness: Across the Universe (2007)

All you need is love! But an HDTV wouldn't hurt.

Photo: Columbia Pictures

You bring up Across the Universe in conversation with a few friends, and they all have an opinion. Either it was too "all over the place" or too "Moulin-Rouge-y," but ask your dear friends when they saw the movie — Was it with you? Or with someone else? — and they'll have to confess: they downloaded it on their iPod Touch, or worse, they haven't even seen it. They just have their smacking loud opinions.

You and I both know it — and if you don't know it, I'm here to tell you: Across the Universe was great. If you haven't seen it yet, please, my dears, update your queue. And here are five reasons why I wholeheartedly recommend you get that shit.

1. Historical relevance: ATU portrays an era that, at the time of its release and even now, is historically relevant. It borders on preaching a bit, what with our leading female's overly can-do quest to aggressively flip off The Man, but the music mellows the message. And you don't need to sew a pair of hemp pants or burn a bra to get down with some ‘60s counterculture. They were in the midst of war; we are in the midst of war. They were young, impressionable and hungry to make a difference; we are in quarter- or mid-life crises, still responsive to stunt casting in advertising (I want the new Rock Band, Michael Phelps!) and experimenting with vegetarianism. They sang about their dilemmas; we post YouTube videos about ours. We are kindred, and the relevance of that historical tie should make you — or your friends — feel at least a small sense of familiarity with the tale.

2. Musical marvelousness: You're right — it's not a word. But it does aptly describe the 33 fantastically inspired musical numbers that anchored the heart of this film. Their portrayal didn't always make sense, but did the Beatles songs all make sense? I am the Walrus? Just go into this film knowing you're about to watch a two-hour Beatles music video, and you'll fare much better. Now, I've heard in some circles it's considered "cool" to hate the Beatles — these are the same circles that think it's "cool" to enter a conversation about Titanic by asking, "What happens in that movie?" — and to those circles, I say, "SHAME." Sure, they only really played about three chords. But they defined an era, in all their goo goo ga joob glory; so if you've worn or even thought about wearing tight pants, shaggy hair or anything yellow, you need to embrace the Beatles.

3. Artistic awesomeness: For the color saturation alone, ATU is worth a wide-eyed stare. That's why I scoff at your buddy with the touch-screen gadget sitting on the big corner couch at Starbucks thinking he's got the best view of the movie. The best view is on the big screen, mister. And if you don't own one, at least mooch off someone who does. Yes, that's a TV in my pants, and yes, I'm delighted to see you. 52 inches of HD glory, and you are invited over to play — provided you don't talk during the road trip scene. Give me Bono tripped out in a Scooby Doo bus crossing the country with a contortionist from a circus freak show, and I will salute you. Artistic awesomeness.

4. Great casting: I love unknown, un-Hollywood-ified actors. I think you do, too. If you liked Tom Cruise in Risky Business, Vince Vaughn in Swingers or heck, even Shia LaBeouf in Shaker Heights (maybe?) then you do, too. Now let me be clear — I am not comparing Jim Sturgess to any of these people; I'm just saying he hasn't been tainted by stardom yet — at least not in this picture — and hence is rather enjoyable to watch. There's something about an actor not knowing how good he is that bleeds through the screen, and that's what I liked about Sturgess and his costars Evan Rachel Wood and Joe Anderson. A little raw and a little rough led to a lot of good.

5. Cameos galore: We've got Bono, Eddie Izzard, Salma Hayek, Joe Cocker…and Neil Patrick Harris might not like it, but sometimes stunt casting makes for good action. So come for the music and the beauty, but stay to count the familiar faces. It might make for a good drinking game.

Photo: Columbia Pictures

Clearly, I'm a fan of this film. Unfortunately, the hurdles surrounding ATU's release got in the way of its coronation within the hall of Great Musical Movies of All Time. Not only did artistic differences abound between the director and producers both on set and during post, but these differences even led the distribution companies to wash their hands of the film's marketing, reportedly. And why shouldn't they? They got their paycheck. Furthermore, the skeptics turned a judgmental eye on Beatles songs being sung by — not the Beatles, not Michael Jackson — but by virtual unknowns. It was a bit too much for them to handle, and instead of trying to cope, they just moved on. Poor Across the Universe.

For more on Across the Universe additional pictures and DVD and Blu-ray details click here.

Related post categories: Overlooked Greatness :

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Oh yeas…I too loved this film! Greatness! But, if you don't see it on the big screen you are indeed robbing yourself.

- Michelle
( January 6th, 2009 | 3:09 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

I enjoy this movie, it makes me feel warm inside on rare occasions, but I don't think I can honestly defend it and this is coming from a *huge* beatles fan who loves to throw on 1978's Peter Frampton/Bee Gees' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band flick to get freaked out a bit. The existence of the Sgt. Pepper movie has and probably still clouds my judgement of Across the Universe for better or worse.

Across the Universe does have some really fuckin' clever shot design and cuts but I can't shake the feeling this is like RENT: episode 1 – 1967. Instead of AIDS our young upstarts are faced with stereotypical '60s social angst and newsflash fodder… ugh am I that bitter?

- izzy
( January 6th, 2009 | 3:44 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

I think what I was trying to say in my previous post is that I wonder as to how it'll be received in the future, possibly like Yellow Submarine, but if that film had an extra chromosome

- izzy
( January 6th, 2009 | 3:49 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

I couldn't agree with this review more- compare the utter shit that gets churned out and this is a hidden gem which will get bigger as the years go by. All you mamma mia lovers out there be ashamed be very ashamed.

- Penelope Wise
( January 6th, 2009 | 6:59 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

Let me be the first one to disagree with all of you. Yes, this movie was entertaining but compared to what this movie could have been it wasn't very good at all, just a montage of music videos filmed to shitty covers of beatles songs. Plus joe cocker sucks.

- Tim
( January 6th, 2009 | 10:52 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

I am a humongous Beatles fan (not very uncommon, I know), but I found this movie very laughable. I felt like the script romanticized the era way too much. I feel like the modern depiction of the 60s is too quick to paint everyone back then as a martyr. Not everyone had this dramatic cause that they were fighting for, a lot of people just wanted to get stoned and throw stuff. Also, the Beatles references (and the 60s in general) were way too obvious. If someone comes in through the bathroom window, you don't need to announce it! If you are familiar with the song, you'll get the reference. Same with the bit with the silver hammer.

I do agree with your points about the visuals, however. They were a lot of fun, and I'm a huge fan of trippy filmmaking no matter what context it's in. Also, regarding the casting, I adore Eddie Izzard, and he was my favorite part of this film. His scene was excellent!

- Dan
( January 6th, 2009 | 2:36 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

I really, REALLY liked this film. Loved? I'm not so sure. But really, really liked? Yes, definitely. The only thing I don't really like is that the songs don't exactly move the story along. I mean, they do some, but not as much as they could. It's a small complaint, and it does better than most musicals, but unless you're a fan of the Beatles, you'd rather the story keep moving than the songs to start up. Thankfully, the great art direction and cast makes up for anything lost in that respect.

Also… okay, now this isn't a bad thing about the movie. Using Beatles songs in a musical is a good idea. However, I'm worried it's a start of a trend. "Mamma Mia!" came out this summer with songs exclusively from ABBA. The problem? ABBA is still good, but it's a step down from the Beatles. The songs had even less to do with the story. See a pattern here? What if more and more musicals just pick a random band and try to make a musical out of their works? It worked for "Across the Universe" to some extent, but you must remember that the songs they use were never ever meant to be part of a single story. The same goes for the songs in "Mamma Mia!" The songs have nothing in common except their creator. In musicals, I feel the songs should be made for the story, not the story for the songs.

But for the most part "Across the Universe" is definitely a good movie.

- JM
( January 6th, 2009 | 9:34 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

I loved this movie… especially when the kid sings that song in the chapel… its one of the most memorable movie moments for me … you were spot on about Jim Sturges… but unfortunately he's been hollywood-ised case in point see 21.. its not a bad film… nothing with spacey in it will ever be bad for me … but its just a mail in performance… not honest and sincere like in this movie… plus even if people think that the beatles "played only three chords" some of the beatles songs on this movie sound better than the originals (Blasphemy!!) I'd whole heartedly recommned this to anyone who enjoys visual-orgasm!

@Wise: i hated mama mia when i saw it in theatre loved meryl but hated the movie … but when i last saw it 2 days back on a flight i thoroughly enjoyed it… and am not ashamed not in the very least ;)

- Viral
( January 6th, 2009 | 11:22 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

I remember first seeing the trailer for this movie, and thinking, "Oh, come on, do we really need another trippy '60s retrospective–directed by Julie Taymor? Hell, I'm game." I saw it in theatres and it blew me away, it was just gorgeous, and the arrangements of the songs were just downright amazing.

- aerinpegadrak
( January 9th, 2009 | 12:30 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #10
Gravatar

I disagree wholeheartedly. Greatness no maybe good. I like it as long as I don't think about it. I didn't care about anyone but jude and his girl. The covers are amazing on the cd but in the movie a lot of them fail. The cinematography isn't as amazing as everyone seems to think. It's not subtle at all. You can have that in your face stuff but you either have to constantly have it going or use very sparingly. Finally and this is the one that kills it for me. A musical with beatles music has to have been thought of before. But it won't be again because this movie was made and people will fear comparison and the studio won't produce it. You have the entire beatles catalogue to pick from and you make a good musical, It should be the greatest musical ever but it's not so the fact that it ruins the opportunity to make the greatest musical ever moves it from a good to a decent.

- billygirdler
( January 10th, 2009 | 12:41 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #11
Gravatar

I agree with everything you said – loved the film, love the Beatles, etc. But why is it that people who know nothing about music always seem to claim the right to make some musical judgement about an artist? I loved almost every word of this review, until it was ruined by your 'they only played three chords' comment, which is just the absolute antithesis of the truth. The Beatles have still not been surpassed in musical complexity by a single pop band 40 years later. I know this has nothing to do with the film, but can people please check up on these things before they throw away stupid comments like that?

- Xavier
( January 13th, 2009 | 1:04 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #12
Gravatar

I'm watching it right and yes it an amazing movie, I've always been a fan of the beatles this is the best tribute they could have ever received… Let the haters hate, and the lovers love this musical! Afterall all you need is love.

- danielle
( January 17th, 2009 | 6:29 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #13
Gravatar

@Tim:

Uh? Joe Cocker? Shit?

Are you mental mate? he is a genius and 'Com Together' was awesome :D

And the Beatles songs weren't covered by complete unknowns, Bono, Joe Cocker and Eddie Izzard all copied them too! ;)

ATU was awesome, and extremely underated, but don't worry, I reckon it will become a cult classic when Sturgess and Wood become mage stars, as is inevitable…

:D

- Jenny
( January 26th, 2009 | 10:25 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #14
Gravatar

I watched this film with great awe yesterday, and I've been spreading the word about it all day since. What a great surprise — I approached the film with doubt but now feel rewarded. Joe Cocker in THREE marvelous cameos in one song. And who is this amazing Dana Fuchs? I'm 71 and vividly remember the Vietnam war, the protests, flower power, and the first time I heard the Beatles — Across the Universe really touched me.

–Marty Jukovsky

- Martin Jukovsky
( January 26th, 2009 | 8:31 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #15
Gravatar

This film is truly a gem! I've been a Beatles fan forever and I totally fell in love with this movie from the time I saw the trailers. It probably helps that I know all the words and can sing along, but it gives me a warm feeling everytime I watch it.
I remember watching the Oprah interview they did and then watching it on the big screen. Ten minutes into it, during the funeral scenes in the church, I was crying and completely hooked. I plan on watching it soon on my daughter's big screen again.

- Marcia Sharp
( January 31st, 2009 | 9:28 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #16
Gravatar

And here in Liverpool we cried all the way through! Yes, call me a sentimental old Scouser (and Cavern Club member 1963), but I loved it.

- Kevin Donovan
( February 9th, 2009 | 11:54 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!