Filed under: Oscar Contenders

Oscar Update: 'Precious' Backlash, 'An Education' Looms Large and New Predictions

A much bigger update than I anticipated

We shall begin with Amelia, a film I wrote about on Monday as it became the talk of the town with hardly a review in sight and a mere five days until its release. Well, that's all changed as I saw the film early Tuesday morning and it seems most everyone in Los Angeles and New York saw it for the first time as well. While I won't be joining David Poland on the train to completely disembowel Mira Nair's film of the famed aviatrix (and it seems Kris Tapley will also be doing the same), I will admit it's not a very good movie and would agree with Justin Chang's take at Variety when he says the film "offers snazzy aerial photography and inspirational platitudes in lieu of insight into Amelia Earhart's storied life and high-flying career."

What does this mean for the Best Actress race? Well, I have had Hilary Swank's stock dropping over the past few weeks and she has slipped yet again, right out of the top five. Yup, I think critical disdain is going to ground this bird as technical awards may be all this one is looking at in terms of Oscar love.

It's not like we are really talking about much competition when it comes to the Best Actress category at this point as it appears Carey Mulligan's performance in An Education is damn near already the decided winner. I guess a late push from Abbie Cornish (Bright Star) could cause a stir, but it would only be as a result of pundits trying to drum up conversation. However, there is one contender I feel is being overlooked and is actually more deserving of the award than Mulligan, despite my own praise for her performance. I am talking of Gabourey Sidibe in Precious, a film that has become the water-cooler topic on the web in the past 48 hours following its snubbing by the Independent Filmmaker Project (IFP) when announcing the 19th Annual Gotham Independent Film Award nominees this past Monday.

Tom O'Neil at Gold Derby was the first to address the absence of Precious from such eligible categories as best picture, breakthrough director (Lee Daniels) and breakthrough performer (Sidibe and/or Mo'Nique). As a result, it got people talking.

Yesterday, Lou Lumenick at the New York Post responded to O'Neil's mention speculating "the film could suffer a backlash because of its high-profile endorsement by Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry." The logic behind his opinion on the matter isn't all that far-fetched, but the idea the film is now too "mainstream" thanks to endorsements from Winfrey and Perry is so petty, should that end up the result it's a sad, sad day in the industry. However, I think we are dealing with something much worse.

Yes, I think there are people carrying torches and pitchforks when it comes to Precious, but the Winfrey and Perry connection is of little concern. Their involvement is going to benefit the film's box-office but it won't move the Oscar dial one bit. Instead, I think the film will be overlooked based on the fact it is a black film, set in Harlem and dealing with some tough, tough issues. To top it off it features two outstanding performances from black actresses that don't fit the Halle Berry mold.

There's no Frieda Pinto to parade on stage, no catchy tunes provided by M.I.A. (although it does have Mary J. Blige's song "Destiny") or dance numbers ushering you out of the cinema. This is a film grounded in humanity and while delving deep into a depressing tale, comes out with complete and utter hope. It won the audience awards at the Sundance and Toronto International film festivals, but will it manage to sway the Academy? I worry it won't be able to, but we are still early in the game and it's one of those times I pray I am wrong as I would certainly award Sidibe the Best Actress Oscar right now. And while I have not yet seen Nine or Up In the Air, and can't speak to those two films, they offer the only competition I could potentially see for Mo'Nique when it comes to Best Supporting Actress, but that idea has also already come under fire. Yeah, there's a faction against Precious, but I think it's time to look deeper than just its executive producers.

O'Neil asked for Oscar bloggers to send him their opinions on the issue late yesterday and as I started to type up my reply to be included in his piece, it became the commentary you see above and I decided to save it for my own post. Too bad, not one of the seven folks that replied brought up my observations. However, Scott Feinberg from And the Winner Is …, who replied to O'Neil, didn't include his entire thoughts on the matter, which he saved for his own post. Here's the most important part:

I can tell you this much: if [Precious] and/or director Lee Daniels and/or lead actress Gabby Sidibe and/or supporting actress Mo’Nique (whose character will pose the chief problem for many of the aforementioned voters) are snubbed by the Academy — which is honestly not inconceivable to me — there will be an uproar that could make past Oscar controversies — think The Color Purple (1985, lost all 11 nominations it received, including one for Oprah), Do the Right Thing (1989, no best picture nod), Brokeback Mountain (2005, lost to heavy underdog Crash), and Dreamgirls (2006, not nominated for best picture or best actress) — pale in comparison.

Amen Scott, but it's going to take more than just nominations to make me happy, especially if the crop of Oscar relevant films doesn't improve over the course of the next two months.

If you are interested in more on Precious you can check out the RopeofSilicon page right here or set aside some time for Lynn Hirschberg's massive profile on director Lee Daniels at the New York Times.

« PREVIOUS PAGENEXT PAGE »
PAGE: 1 2

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

I stopped caring about the Academy Awards when Brockeback Mountain lost to Crash in 2005.

- Wickedlycool
( October 22nd, 2009 | 6:57 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

There definitley is some closet racism when it comes to the oscars. And usually when they attempt to make up for it with things like crash it only makes them look like there in favor of the over-exposed stereotypes that we see. The fact that it took decades for Morgan Freeman to get an award over 3-6 Mafia shows the voting history of the academey.

I was very happy to see The Hurt Locker get nominated by the gothams and hopefully it can keep the momentum going through oscars to get the top nominations. I know there has been a lot of buzz about abby cornish but I'm still hoping to see if Peter Sarsgaard can finally get some love from the academey for An Education.

- Colin
( October 22nd, 2009 | 9:18 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

I never understood why people think the Oscars don't matter. If someone wins an Oscar, that means creative freedom to choose whatever projects they want for the next 3-5 years, maybe longer.

Just look at Phillip Seymour Hoffman after his 2005 win for Capote. The floodgates opened up for him after that, and he has gone on to make a ton of great movies that he wouldn't have had the opportunity to do before (he was not a leading man before that, but now he gets leading man roles like Doubt and The Savages).

The Oscars will always be relevant, and even though I disagree with some of their decisions (Diablo Cody, I'm looking at you), I will always love watching them and recognize their importance.

- Scott
( October 22nd, 2009 | 9:43 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

Uhm, Scott? Diablo Cody's Juno happens to be one of the most INSPIRED pieces of writing EVER!

- Wickedlycool
( October 22nd, 2009 | 10:06 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

I lost interest back in 1976 when Taxi Driver lost to can you believe it, Rocky! (Remember Apocalypose Now losing to Kramer vs. Kramer or ET to Gandhi, Goodfellas to Dances With Wolves and The Shawshank Redemption to Forrest Gump, to mention a few atrocities). Ever since, to me this is the most overrated SnobHillShow on earth. I couldn´t care less.

- Helgi
( October 22nd, 2009 | 5:24 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

Last year was one of the hugest snubs ever. I mean, "The Dark Knight" not nominated for Best Picture? Critics reviewed it as positively as they reviewed "Slumdog Millionaire." And EVERYBODY, whether critics or audiences, liked it better than "Frost/Nixon" and "The Reader." Especially "The Reader." I could have possibly borne the snub had "Revolutionary Road" or "Doubt" taken the BP nom slot that belonged to TDK. But why "The Reader"? And F/N was good, but to say it was in any way–in any way at all!–a greater achievement than TDK is bollocks. Not only did they snub TDK, but they also snubbed Wall-E. I am convinced it had EVERYTHING to do with that 1) They were wide-release "popular" films, and 2) They weren't released in November or December.

Also, "Revolutionary Road" was snubbed by "The Reader." Really. I mean, Kate Winslet is always a great actress, but are you really going to say her role in "The Reader" was as good as that amazing performance she gave in "Revolutionary Road"? Nobody is going to say that. I don't know how the hell the Academy decided to reward Winslet for The Reader and not RR. The Weinsteins must have bribed the Academy something terrible, because "The Reader" wasn't even all that appreciated by critics. It was barely fresh on the tomatometer. I watched it, and while some of it was really good, it was one of those cerebral mind-pieces that was screaming for awards from the first frame to the last. And wouldn't have it been so much more touching had Kate Winslet won her long-overdue Oscar for a role directed by her husband? That would have been pure gold. Thank a whole fucking lot, shithead Academy.

- JM
( October 22nd, 2009 | 8:35 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

At least Micheal Shannon got nominated from Revolutionary Road. If anyone would've beat Heath Ledger out last year he would've been the only that I was ok with, well, maybe Josh Brolin but Shannon would've be right after Ledger.

- Colin
( October 22nd, 2009 | 8:41 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

@JM: I definitely disagree with the stuff you say 'no one is going to say'. Certainly, The Reader was bought. But I think TDK would have been a weak replacement – sure, it's one of my favorite movies, but AMPAS rewards "best" picture, not "fan fave" picture. I think TDK had some serious flaws, especially with it's script. Maybe there is something to be said about the Academy preferring "flawless and uninspired" to "flawed but brilliant", but that is a different question. One important point that I think must be made is that TDK earned BROAD approval from critics, at an impressive 94%, that doesn't necessarily mean that any of them thought it should have been best picture. Some of them did, of course, but I really think that using audience approval and the percentage of critics that liked it to justify it as Best Pic doesn't work.

Also, I really, truly disagree that Kate for 'Rev Road' was anything near Kate for 'The Reader'. While I wish they both could have been nominated, my personal opinion was that Kate in 'The Reader' was the best performance of the year in any category.

And finally – thanks Scott, well put.

- Dan Tralder
( October 22nd, 2009 | 9:21 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

Alright. Let's settle the Brokeback Mountain / Crash controversy once and for all. Capote was the best picture of the year!

- Mark Maiden
( October 22nd, 2009 | 9:43 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #10
Gravatar

@JM:

Remember when she appeared on Extras and said the Academy loves Nazi movies?

- Brandi
( October 22nd, 2009 | 10:00 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #11
Gravatar

@Helgi:

I stopped believing in the Oscars when Network lost to Rocky in 1976. I haven't seen rocky and I probably won't under my own will.

- Paolo
( October 23rd, 2009 | 12:20 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #12
Gravatar

The Oscars have been losing viewers more and more every year. They insult the publics intelligence, and they insult mine. For an actor or director to win, this does open the gates for them and their freedom in film, but this fact is a sad truth. The Acedemy is ran by old racists, and sadists.
The year where they gave Washington the best actor, Halle Berry the best actress, and Sidney the life time achievment award, they were desperate to show that they were not racist, (a desperate and pathetic attempt on their part.) I'm sorry, but I love Denzel as an actor, but he should not have won that year, Sean Pean should have.
I hate the academy…I am irrate just thinking about how fake they are, that I have to leave this article now.

- Brunk
( October 23rd, 2009 | 1:56 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #13
Gravatar

The case of Gabby likely being overlooked at the Oscars is a case of too much of the person identified with the role, i.e. how much of an acting stretch is that? As for the young ones, Mulligan and Cornish, ingenue roles are replaceable. Other young actresses can conceivably do as well in these films. Think of Renee Zellweger in a star-making turn in Jerry Maguire, though snubbed at the Oscars, or a young Kate Winslet in Sense and Sensibility or Titanic, nominated but did not win. On the other hand, could anyone else have pulled off Julia the way Meryl did? It was not only a bravura performance technically in believably approximating the real Julia Child, but also a touching and loving portrayal of a real person. It was singular and impressive.

- george
( October 23rd, 2009 | 3:35 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #14
Gravatar

For anyone who cares, I would rather have Gabby Sidibe win an Oscar against Meryl Streep than have Mo'nique win against Julianne Moore or Morgan Freeman against Christopher Plummer. All I'm saying.

And they're more of a gossip site, but BestWeekEver said something about Precious that made them not interested. I'll look again.

- Paolo
( October 23rd, 2009 | 8:09 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #15
Gravatar

And as an afterthought, if the snubbing of Precious implies a snubbing of blacks in the Academy, there aren't just enough movies about black people then. A hundred and twenty five years and still not enough people of colour in Hollywood.

- Paolo
( October 23rd, 2009 | 8:38 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #16
Gravatar

I am one of those people who believe that The Dark Knight should have been nominated last year for Best Picture and Best Director instead of The Reader.

I also think it's ridiculous that Crash beat out Brokeback Mountain, as well as Slumdog Millionaire beating out Milk. And of course, as mentioned, Rocky beating out Taxi Driver or Network… or even Ordinary People beating out Raging Bull.

Ridiculous.

- Chris
( October 23rd, 2009 | 12:42 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #17
Gravatar

the oscars suck ass anyway, when diablo cody won for best screenplay, i decided never to trust any awards that they hand out are to the rightful winner

- Ethan
( October 23rd, 2009 | 3:13 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #18
Gravatar

That's unfortunate. Although I often take issue with the lower-level (4th and 5th) nominations in the major categories, I generally agree with who they give the wins to. Like every single other person on the planet, I have exceptions too, such as Cider House rules taking Best Screenplay, Sean Penn taking Best Actor (2008, not 2003), and Scorsese taking Best Director in 2006. But point being, there aren't too many I disagree with, and the few that I do I suppose I'm in a clear minority – I'm sure not many of you agree that Departed didn't deserve Best Director (although I think it deserved Best Pic and Screenplay). But that's ok: as long as some of us agree with the academy, and a bunch of y'all don't, things will stay interesting on these comment boards.

- Dan Tralder
( October 23rd, 2009 | 3:30 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #19
Gravatar

@Rumours: WHAT kind of rumors are those?!

- m1
( October 24th, 2009 | 9:34 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #20
Gravatar

@Chris: People, seriously. Slumdog Millionaire was FANTASTIC! And though this out of the blue, WALL-E was the best movie of last year!

- m1
( October 24th, 2009 | 5:05 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #21
Gravatar

@JM: Actually, I thought F/N was better than TDK. But I liked it.

- m1
( October 25th, 2009 | 11:38 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #22
Gravatar

If 'Precious' receives any Oscars on the grounds of anything other than great quality then it will be a travesty, and a victory for the those misguided fools in the pc brigade.

- cmac
( October 26th, 2009 | 1:53 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #23
Gravatar

Which leads me to the question of why twits everywhere are assuming that "Precious" is gonna win Oscars because of the PC brigade.

- Paolo
( October 27th, 2009 | 12:52 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!