Filed under: Editorials

Never Let a Critic Tell You Not To See a Film

They may just be spewing a 'body of lies'

Back in early October, just after the release of Body of Lies, I was trolling around reading several of the reviews the film had received. Body of Lies has a 50% Rotten Tomatoes ranking so I knew it was going to be a mixed bag and since I liked it to the tune of a B+ grade I was interested in seeing what other reviewers had to say and why so many were being hard on it.

I danced around from here to there when I landed on Owen Gleiberman's review at Entertainment Weekly. I had remembered Gleiberman's name from when I had to do a little custom skin for RopeofSilicon to promote Hamlet 2. His "Dementedly Hilarious" was in big bold letters on the theatrical standee for the film and I had to incorporate it into my work. As we all know, if "Entertainment Weekly" likes it then it must be good. Well, does that mean since Gleiberman didn't like Body of Lies you shouldn't go see it?

I am not choosing his review randomly, although it seems that way now since the comments attached to his review have somehow disappeared (and I should know because I left one).

His review, when originally posted, was labeled as a D+ and has since changed to a C- and when originally posted there was a comment associated with the review that said, "Well that's too bad, I guess I won't be seeing this one and I was looking forward to it." I am sure that is not exactly how it read, but it doesn't really matter because some variation of that statement has been posted many times before I am sure, but the problem is that no matter if Owen Gleiberman, myself or any random schmoe gives a film a bad review that shouldn't effect whether or not you go see it. Everyone has different tastes and with the world we now live in there are going to be many opportunities for you to read a review far in advance of a film's release, but that isn't always going to be to your benefit. Of course, saying this on the same day I publish my review of Quantum of Solace two weeks in advance may not be the best promotion, but it's true.

On top of that, just because someone writes for a major publication it doesn't necessarily mean they have the ability to make a judgment on movies. Just read Gleiberman's review of Let the Right One In, and don't judge it based on his "C" grade, judge it on the fact he dedicated a paragraph to a film that deserves more whether you liked it or not. This is a guy considered a "Top Critic" at Rotten Tomatoes, a guy that made at least one person not go see Body of Lies and a guy that should be able to at least put down a couple hundred words for a vampire flick many are calling one of the best ever. The film's quality really has no bearing here though, a dedication to your audience is what's at stake.

I have a hard time believing I would ever effect someone's decision to see a movie. However, I hope I inspire a few people to think about what they have seen. And even more importantly, I hope I am able to encourage some people to see a movie they otherwise may have skipped because it didn't fit into their typical movie going niche. This is why I sometimes review certain films last, such as when I posted my review for I've Loved You So Long last when reviewing three other films that same day. My hope was to encourage at least one person to take notice of that film since so many will never even see it.

The role of a film critic is interesting. The title seems to imply criticism, and there is certainly a level of criticism in every review, but the position should be looked at by the public simply as an opening for consideration and discussion. You should never let a critic tell you what not to see based on their review, especially if you have any urge to see a specific movie in the first place. However, by all means, allow a critic to talk you into seeing a film you otherwise may pass over.

So, definitely go see Body of Lies if you are interested (or even a film such as the critically panned Max Payne for that matter). Why should critical opinion stop you? But, if you have the time, it wouldn't hurt to add a film such as I've Loved You So Long into the mix as well. You may be surprised at how much you like it.

Related post categories: Editorials, Reviews : ,

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Not only do I not let a critic tell me not to see a film, but I also don't let a critic (or anyone for that matter), tell me to SEE a film.
I go by what *I* think looks good, and then see that.

- khristopher
( November 3rd, 2008 | 1:34 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

Same here, I do however base my interest on the information I can get from sites like this one, not on the opinions.
That's why I still want to see Max Payne.

It is interesting to find out why a critic liked/disliked certain aspects of the film.
It can help you notice things you've might have missed.

I usually don't read reviews until I've seen the film, unless I wasn't going to see it anyway.

- RaTTleR_NL
( November 3rd, 2008 | 7:19 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

Sometimes I let the IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes numbers dictate whether or not I'll see a film that I'm on the edge about spending money on (such as Max Payne, which I will not be seeing, but I did see Body of Lies and really liked it despite the mixed reviews).

A classic example for me is Pirates 2 and 3, those movies were critically panned, and hell, even most people I know don't like them all that much. Those are two of my favorite movies I'd have to say, I love what they did with the franchise after 1, and I'd say it's one of my favorite film trilogies ever.

I don't usually read specific reviews until after I've seen the movie (especially Ebert, he usually spoils the whole movie), but I think it's wise to at least look at the overall critical reaction to a film.

- Greenleaf1
( November 3rd, 2008 | 9:37 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

As with many things, it's all about the benjamins. If I am considering driving 90 minutes into NYC, plus paying for parking and tolls, to see a Swedish vampire film (since that's the nearest place showing the film), I damn sure want to know as much about the film as possible. While I probably wouldn't rely on just one critic, I do need some reassurance that it's not a total waste of time & money. The gasoline alone will cost more than the movie ticket – even NYC prices.

It's different when I'm just going to the nearest multiplex; then if Body of Lies isn't great, well at least I get to stop by Walmart/Target/Shop-Rite on the way home. Going to the movies that way just breaks up the monotony of weekend shopping chores. (OK I'll admit I'm odd in that I almost always go alone to the movies, usually to the bargain matinee, & rarely eat overpriced movie food. But I did drive over an hour to see Dark Knight in IMAX.)

Sure movies are still a bargain compared to concert tickets ($95 for AC/DC) or sporting events. But for limited release films like Let the Right One In, I almost wish you'd just wait for the DVD release so I don't forget about it when it finally arrives.

- matthew715
( November 3rd, 2008 | 10:47 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

I'm with you on Body of Lies. I gave it a great review and don't understand all the lukewarm reviews its gotten.

Vic

- Screen Rant
( November 3rd, 2008 | 11:29 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time ~ Trailer
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!