Filed under: Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Hellboy 2: The Golden Army’

Hope you didn't have your hopes up...

Photo: Universal Pictures

I can deal with the silly one-liners and the relationship issues between a demon from Hell and his firestarter girlfriend, but when the Fishman falls in love with the Elfish looking woman you can consider me stupefied.

Don’t know what I am talking about? Why, I am talking about Hellboy 2: The Golden Army, the “Bold and the Beautiful” of all comic book films. There is a love story everywhere you turn and I don’t think a gruff sounding underwear model with an eye patch could make this dialogue any more nauseating. What’s even worse is that Hellboy 2 has a kick ass villain. Too bad the rest of the film is so bogged down with meaningless crap that you don’t even care by the time he shows up.

Is Hellboy 2 impressive visually? You better believe it. Guillermo del Toro has never been anything less than a visionary director. He can make a turd on a log beautiful. The creatures are impressive. The battle scenes are loud. Everything about this film from a visual perspective is damn near flawless. Too bad it takes more than pretty pictures to make a two-hour motion picture any good. The first Hellboy was a mediocre achievement. It was neither great nor poor. It too was a pretty film, but the story lacked substance. Hellboy 2 is oozing substance, but it isn’t the good kind.

Despite the fact that a rogue war between the fantasy realm and humankind is about to be unleashed, approximately 75% of Hellboy 2 focuses either on Hellboy’s love for Liz and desire to be “accepted” or Abe Sapien’s fanciful prance abouts before deciding he loves the Ally McBeal look-a-like sister of the man determined to crush mankind. This man, the villainous Prince Nuada played by Luke Goss is the only good thing about this movie. Goss has a presence and commands your attention. You want to hear what he has to say and why he is saying it. His character is the heart of the film, and so is his cause, but it is all lost in the love stories Del Toro decides to tell. Nuada’s time on screen is limited, but when he is there it will be the only time you really find yourself paying complete attention.

Aquatic do gooder Abe Sapien was basically an afterthought in the first film, and it seems he should have been kept there. Not only is he basically a worthless hanger-on, his story arc only slows down the film to the point that you just wish he would get killed off in a horrible and gruesome fashion. Fish fry anyone? Outside of being a rather reliable pregnancy test his character does nothing but take up space and runtime.

Hellboy 2 is a Del Toro film through-and-through, but it just seems like when he is playing in this sandbox too much of his inner-child seeps into the school yard. Hellboy 2 is far too playful and far too harmful to be considered entertaining.

This film is going to get plenty of high marks from critics still blinded by Del Toro’s rising star following his success with Pan’s Labyrinth. While this film is visually on par with Pan, the story feels like people had way too much time on their hands and just continued to add scenes that should have been left on the cutting room floor. The effects are bigger. The weapons are bigger and the creatures are plentiful. Unfortunately the nearly 2 hour run time feels like an eternity, so much to the point that the film actually melted during my screening in an attempt to save us from any more torment. In the end they got it fixed and the foreseeable ending played out as planned.

Oh well, I guess I will have to wait and see if The Hobbit will be Del Toro’s next great film.

D+

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Really???? D+?? Shit, I was excited to see this one. Guillermo DelToro is one of my favorite directors. I’m still going to see it.

- ravidlaz
( July 9th, 2008 | 4:47 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

If you are interested in seeing it I would definitely check it out. Even though everything I say is true, you may actually like the film for what it is. I obviously did not. :)

- bradbrevet
( July 9th, 2008 | 12:27 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

2+ hour running time? what movie did you watch? It’s less than 2 hours.

- exposed film
( July 11th, 2008 | 3:15 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

exposed film said: 2+ hour running time? what movie did you watch? It’s less than 2 hours.

Good point, just checked the runtime. I guess I forgot to take into consideration that when the film melted it wasted another ten minutes of my life. However, nitpicking the review and finding only that flaw doesn’t make the film any better, especially when it is fixed with a simple edit.

- bradbrevet
( July 11th, 2008 | 2:24 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

One of the barometers I use to gauge a film’s quality is if at any point during the show I start to feel embarrassed that I convinced someone to accompany me…then it’s a bad movie. Well let me tell you I squirmed quite a bit while my wife and I watched this travesty on opening night. I enjoyed the original "Hellboy" quite a bit. I thought that it brought an interesting twist to the tired super-hero genre. But Hellboy 2 is just awful. The acting is atrocious. Selma Blair and Doug Jones may find it difficult to land any more roles outside of del Toro’s realm after these performances. The frequent lame attempts at humor miss the mark entirely. There is absolutely no real threat to overcome which makes the whole exercise pointless and forgettable. The set design, costumes, makeup and special effects are wondrous but I quickly grew tired of watching what amounts to an over stylized effects reel. My wife and I are huge fans of sc-fi/fantasy films with The Dark Knight high on our must see list so I figured Hellboy 2 would be a safe bet. Man, was I wrong.

- Stiggs
( July 13th, 2008 | 3:10 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

I can’t tell you how nice it is to hear I am not the only one that had problems with this movie. I just had a friend text me the same sentiments saying, "Abe was lame, the story was lame, effects were cool."

- bradbrevet
( July 14th, 2008 | 3:00 am )
Reply to this comment
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
ADVERTISEMENT
Is what you've got never enough?
First midnight... Now the weekend...
Blue aliens and spiked hair drawings
It's based on the comic, not the movie, as if that makes a difference
Kids will like the pretty colors, but this movie offers little to keep the attention of thinking audiences
I wonder if the main characters are even in this flick
How much will Twilight make? Under $70m.
You've seen digital snaps, here are the real things
You all are going to love this movie
Yet, he may be just the man for the job
ADVERTISEMENT
This is a wait and see scenario
This one's strictly for the fans
Damn, that stop-motion animation is impressive
From Best Picture to Original Screenplay...
Another look at the same question with a different approach
Looking for meaning in a fanboy world
HUGE update today... One guess at what Eastwood's next is rated...
This film is going to be a bust or a blast
Creator of 'The O.C.' and 'Gossip Girl' gets mutant gig
'Narnia' scribes pull duty on 'The First Avenger'
The original wasn't even all that good
Mickey is easily the front-runner and some more early Oz reviews arrive
Will Cruise ever step out of the shadow he created for himself?
Sounds like its a winner... for the most part
You ever think they are just trying to piss the guy off?