Filed under: Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian (2009)

The kids may enjoy it, but the laughs are limited

Ben Stiller in Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
Photo: 20th Century Fox

The best way to describe Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian is to say it is harmless, but that doesn't necessarily make it good. Besides a couple of chuckles, this flick never inspires much laughter outside of a moment when Ben Stiller as Larry Daley kisses the reanimated version of Amelia Earhart and a youngster in my audience yelled out, "Ewwwwww!" Pretty rough when a 7-year-old (guessing) in the audience supplies the film's largest laugh.

I never saw the 2006 original film, but from what I have heard it isn't half bad despite the majority of negative reviews it received on its way to an impressive $250+ million domestic box-office haul. Negative reviews be damned! Money talks and Stiller is back as Larry Daley, a graveyard-shift night watchman at the Museum of Natural History in the first film, who has moved on to form his own company selling "As Seen On TV" inventions to much success. However, money can't seem to replace his desire to be back in the company of the reanimated exhibits at the museum.

Battle of the Smithsonian follows a select group of the exhibits, such as Jedediah Smith played by Owen Wilson, from the first film as they are boxed up for storage and shipped off to the National Archives at the Smithsonian. The catch is they will be going there without the magic tablet that brings them to life, but the monkey steals it and once they get to the Smithsonian all hell breaks loose as the 3,000 year-old Pharaoh Kah Mun Rah (Hank Azaria) comes to life and claims ownership of the tablet and his intent to rule the world by unleashing an army of birdmen. In the process he locks Larry's buddies up, but not before Jedediah gets a phone call in to Larry informing him of the situation.

The film follows the process of Larry impersonating his way into the Smithsonian and saving his friends. On the way he has a mini romance with Amelia Earhart (Amy Adams), talks to bobble-head Einsteins (Eugene Levy) and destroys a giant stained glass window along with damn near everything else. Of course, when exhibits impersonating historical figures come to life and start impersonating those figures and some of them use an inexplicable lisp I think we can pretty much throw logic and reason out the window.

So, we are left with entertainment value and whether or not this film brings any. As I pointed out early on, no, it really doesn't I am actually surprised I managed five paragraphs talking about it. I was told while leaving the theater by someone that had seen the first film the sequel wasn't as good, but I do expect families with young children to get a kick out of it — that is when the two leads aren't smooching — and won't be surprised if this one repeats with big dollars at the box-office. The film has pretty colors, loud noises and a little monkey. I mean, what more could a kid want from a film?

GRADE: C-
Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian was released by 20th Century Fox on May 22, 2009 and was directed by Shawn Levy. The MPAA has rated it PG for mild action and brief language. The cast includes Ben Stiller, Amy Adams, Hank Azaria, Owen Wilson, Steve Coogan, Ricky Gervais, Ed Helms and Christopher Guest.

For more information on this film including pictures, trailers and a detailed synopsis click here.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

The first movie wasn't all that bad…just completely unmemorable. Pretty much anyone over the age of 10 saw that movie and said "it was ok, could've been worse", but no one was ever really clamoring for a sequel. This'll do fine box-office wise (until it gets decimated by "Up" next week) but 8 months from now no one will remember this film.

- Vince
( May 22nd, 2009 | 7:27 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

I literally falling asleep during this film….
The good (I better start with it first):
- Amy Adams (so funny and so comical, somehow I love it!!!)
- Jonas Brothers as Cupid trio or the immitation of them as I recall (singing love songs, Titanic theme song, hillarious!!!)
THAT`s IT!!!!

The bad (oh i can go on and on):
- As much as they all hated the first one (critic), I loved it….. but this movie is unecessary
- I felt like dragged as I watched the entire film, feel sooooo long…….. (boring)
- Ben Stiller gives no more symphaty for me (as Larry Daley) compared to the first one
- A lot of unecessary character, stereotype!!!!
And on… and on…..
Just watch the movie, but don`t hope too high for this one….

Regards from Indonesia….

Buddy

- buddy
( May 22nd, 2009 | 8:37 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

This should've opened a week ago alongside Angels and Demons, it would've given it more room before "UP"

- junjun
( May 22nd, 2009 | 10:44 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

I hate the first movie. It annoyed the hell out of me (especially that f***in' monkey). As much as I love Amy Adams – and I love her a lot -, I won't be seeing this one. And hey, now there are two monkeys!!

- Adriano
( May 22nd, 2009 | 11:38 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

What the original movie had was…originality. The back story was intriquing with Dick Van Dyke and Mickey Rooney (!) playing the retiring night watchmen. When the displays came to life it was slapstick comedy back in fine form. When some escaped the musieum, it was hilarious. Certainly it was best if you were seeing this with a youngster, admitedly. But this repeat has definitely lost the edge of originality. What it offers is bigger and more, not a well thought out idea for a sequel. The problem with slapstick like this is that is walks a fine line surrounded by stupidity and chaos. This one sounds like it fell off the line.

- Patricia
( May 22nd, 2009 | 7:20 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

Extremely boring and not all living up to its name.

- Ron
( May 26th, 2009 | 12:08 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

I think the movie was exactly what it needed to be. Light fluffy entertainment. Nothing wrong with that but nothing really in the movie to make it anything.

- Geoff
( May 28th, 2009 | 1:47 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

wats song was it when amelia and larry kissed?i mean there were like "me ad you" in the lyrics.?

- leonora
( May 30th, 2009 | 12:00 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
What are the critics saying about
"Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian"?
44%
Read the Reviews
RottenTomatoes ©1998-2010, IGN Entertainment, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Latest Posts
Latest Video
The Last Airbender ~ Super Bowl TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!