Filed under: Comic-Con

Marvel's Film Future Follows the Road to 'The Avengers'

Jon Favreau and Kevin Feige discuss characters and considerations for the superhero team-up

I am sure most comic book movie lovers all remember the ups and downs of the "Justice League" movie Warner Bros. was trying to piece together prior to the writers' strike that ultimately fell by the way side. As far as story details went, very little was known, but the casting of the project obviously led us to believe they were aiming to put together a young team of actors and introduce a massive world of superheroes in one singular film all at once. The idea, to many and myself included, sounded not only impossible, but ridiculous. With two separate Batman franchises, a successful Superman franchise followed by a failed attempt to reboot the character and the knowledge no one from the established franchises would be a part of the proceedings. It was a risky consideration to say the least, but it appears Marvel's attempt to do the same thing is much more thought out and has been so since the beginning.

In talking with several online writers during Comic Con, Marvel executive Kevin Feige discussed the process of bringing the Marvel universe together in feature films with The Avengers, and how they plan on doing it on a grand scale. "I get to cheat because it's been done before in comics. It's not how the dots connect — we might be changing them a little bit — but it's that experience of reading comics we're trying to bring to movies, to people who've never opened a comic book before."

"I've said it a million times," he continued, "The best part about reading a comic in the Marvel universe is that any character can pop into any of the other ones. That's not been possible [in the movies] until Iron Man, but it's not about cramming in lots of new characters, that sort of cardinal sin of the sequel — explaining too many characters — [Iron Man 2] is totally Tony Stark's story and Tony Stark's story is going to weave into a character named Thor's story and a character named Steve Rogers's story and is already engrained in Nick Fury's story and an organization known as S.H.I.E.L.D., which we wove into [Iron Man]."

For any of you that watched the Iron Man 2 Comic Con panel I posted last night you already know director Jon Favreau brought up The Avengers, a film currently slated for a May 4, 2012 release in which Iron Man, Thor, Captain America and other heroes come together to form Marvel's first supergroup. Well, Feige elaborated on the idea even further to both my table as well as a table attended by Collider.com.

When I asked about the superhero team-up and his concerns in making sure the films work as standalone features as well as work in setting up The Avengers he told me, "My only concern is that whichever character's franchise we're launching that it stands on its own two feet. With Iron Man being the first one out of the gate, thank goodness that's what happened. Now everybody loves Iron Man [and] it's our job to do the same thing with Thor and the same thing with Captain America two years from now so by the time The Avengers comes in 2012 it's not just a team superhero movie with just a bunch of characters with powers, it's these three people — four including the Hulk — five including Nick Fury, that you've seen in other movies before now coming together for the very first time."

Photo: Marvel

Yeah, they are still looking at the Hulk following the 2008 reboot starring Edward Norton that didn't exactly wow at the box-office, but hasn't been abandoned by Marvel outright. I asked Feige for confirmation of Hulk's involvement and he said, "I think he will be [in it], absolutely," and Collider got even further details on the characters involved saying:

I think we know. It's going to be Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, Nick Fury. I think it's safe to assume that there will be some members of the Hulk universe in the film as well. In terms of the additional, I think Black Widow for sure. S.H.I.E.L.D.'s organization for sure. And, again, what's exciting to me about the Avengers movie are seeing those four characters together and interact with each other. Anywhere from the first issue of the Avengers to Civil War, the dynamic between Steve Rogers and Tony Stark is awesome and fascinating. It brings out sides of the others that won't be brought out in their own franchises. Throwing Thor into the mix is a whole other thing and I think that will be cool. So to pile in another ten or fifteen… or frankly even four… I think will be too many.

Of course, the combining of these separate mythologies has worked for a longtime in the pages of comic books, but how does doing the same thing translate to the big screen? Or does it? To ask Kevin Feige he'll tell you there is no challenge in weaving the fantasy of "Thor" with the science fiction of "Iron Man" into The Avengers.

"No, because that's what Thor is," Feige told us. "We're doing the Jack Kirby, Stan Lee, Walt Simonson, J. Michael Straczynski “Thor” we're not doing the blow-the-dust-off-the-old-Norse-book-in-your-library “Thor” and in that “Thor,” the “Thor” in the Marvel universe, there's a race called the Asgardians [fictional race of gods in the Marvel Comics] that were linked through this mystery of life and we don't know about it. It's real, it's real science, we just don't know about it yet and the Thor movie is teaching people about that."

Robert Downey Jr., Edward Norton, Scarlett Johansson, Samuel L. Jackson, Chris Hemsworth

To this point we already know, should things work out as currently set up, Robert Downey Jr. will play Tony Stark in The Avengers, Samuel L. Jackson will play Nick Fury, Scarlett Johansson would play Black Widow and Chris Hemsworth would play Thor. That, of course, is in addition to several other supporting characters. As far as Edward Norton returning as The Hulk, Feige said, "I think there's always a chance. It's certainly our intention to use the same actors from film-to-film where we can." However, should you be anticipating an The Incredible Hulk 2 you may be waiting a longtime, that is if it happens at all, as Feige added, "That would be post-Avengers if that happened."

Finally, the last piece of the Avengers puzzle to be questioned during the Con was the director as a young man asked if Favreau would take on the duties during the panel and it came up again during the roundtable interviews. Obviously there is no one aboard yet, but Favreau did say it would be weird to see someone step in and take over where he has been operating for the past four years.

Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark and Jon Favreau as Happy Hogan in Iron Man
Photo: Paramount Pictures

"Oh yeah, sure. Oh it's hard, it's always hard," when asked how he would feel. "Sometimes it's better, but that's a letting go. It's strange when you have to switch those hats, because I'm not used to that, and just going from directing and creating this world to just being Happy Hogan in The Avengers would be — I'm not going to lie — it would be strange. I'll be involved as an executive producer, but it's a lot different being a consultant on something [compared to] being the guy calling the shots. There's a lot of people collaborating on Iron Man, but I know at the end of the day the buck stops here. It's fun, but it's also a lot of pressure, but I enjoy it."

Favreau even recalled the scene at the end of The Incredible Hulk when Robert Downey Jr. playing Tony Stark meets with William Hurt as General Ross saying, "It's even interesting watching The Hulk where there's a scene with Tony Stark. I wasn't involved with, so that was strange, but I think Kevin [Feige] has a sense of the big picture [and] where everything is going and I'll be involved to whatever extent they see fit and works well with where my interests lie."

As for future installments of Iron Man Favreau said, "I always felt if there was a third episode it should be The Avengers and I was even sort of joking about that when we first announced Iron Man, now it really could happen."

The Avengers is set to hit theaters on May 4, 2012, but before that time fans will see Iron Man 2 on May 7, 2010, Thor on May 20, 2011 and The First Avenger: Captain America on July 22, 2011. If done correctly this could be one of the most entertaining movie franchises of all-time.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

So excited about the possibilities this franchise could have! Hopefully no one will screw it up

- BR
( July 26th, 2009 | 8:55 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

They're scaring me a little bit with the Hulk stuff though, they have to work him in into the Avengers somewhere!

- Alex
( July 26th, 2009 | 11:40 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

I don't mean to sound like a pessimist but I'm not looking forward to Scarlett Johansen's portrayal of the Black Widow or whatever she is. Emily Blunt would've been so much better. SJ is just a bland actress and her role in Vicky Christine Barcelona sums it up because she was overlooked by most of her lovers just like she's overlooked as an actress. She's just like a good prop in the set, cool to look at but doesn't really add to the story.

I'm more looking forward to the DC movies; like Green Lantern, Flash (maybe), Superman-Batman Public Enemies (animated), and the next set of Superman movies (hopefully produced by the Wachowski brothers). Marvel is letting me down since they have too many characters and all. I think Avengers will do ok though because of the action and star power.

- Anonymous' Friend
( July 26th, 2009 | 11:46 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

Alexander Skarsgard

I think he would be perfect for Super Soldier Stever Rogers.I know he isn't American, but who cares. It's called acting.He was in contention for Thor, but I feel his build which is tall and athletic is much more suited for Cap. If anyone has seen Generation Kill where he played "Iceman" knows he can pull off an American soldier with ease. It's interesting that in Generation Kill there was a unit leader who every one nickname Captain America. He was a total F up and didn't get anything right. So lets start the Campaign for Skarsgard as Captain America. If he does get cast it will also bring a lot of attention to the movie just for the fact an American born Actor isn't playing the role.

- Cash Money
( July 27th, 2009 | 8:05 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

What about Ant-Man?

- EnglishGavz
( July 27th, 2009 | 8:55 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

The Hulk should be the 1st and foremost enemy to the Avengers, this is due to him being controlled by Loki, Thor's brother!

- Azreal71
( July 27th, 2009 | 8:55 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

I hope the plot of the Avengers movie turns out be a lot more layered than "Everybody pile on Hulk!"

I like how Ant-Man has been mysteriously dropped. The fact that nobody thought to question this or even remember about him just goes to show what a wise decision it is on Marvel's part.

- Vik
( July 27th, 2009 | 9:53 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

Marvel has the better characters. They will work on film.

DC Comics will not. They are the ones that have heroes that wear light colored tights and non existent stories.

- Joe
( July 27th, 2009 | 12:48 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

Hulk is definitely the weak link. They just cant seem to make a good movie on him (the CGI for me has been underwhelming as well), maybe he'll make a better fit in a supporting role; as it will be in Avengers.

- adu
( July 28th, 2009 | 12:50 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #10
Gravatar

DC's superhero ensemble is much stronger than Marvel's, IMO. They have three of the most iconic comic book characters in pop culture – Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman. On top of that, their second tier is pretty solid too including the likes of The Flash, Green Lantern and Green Arrow. On the other hand Marvel has…Thor. And they had to consider the likes of Ant-Man, ANT-MAN for crying out loud, to fill up their roster. As for DC storylines, just two words…KINGDOM COME.

- Vik
( July 28th, 2009 | 12:56 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #11
Gravatar

@adu : I agree, not many people seem to be that invested in The Hulk nowadays, no matter what kind of a film they make for him. I guess it is because by this point the whole Jekyll & Hyde aspect has been covered in so many different ways and in ways which are much more creative and interesting(eg. Two-Face from Batman), that The Hulk doesn't have anything all that unique left to offer.

- Vik
( July 28th, 2009 | 1:04 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #12
Gravatar

@Vik: You seem to be missing the entire first teir of Marvel, starting with Spider-Man. Both Superman and Spiderman are THE two most recognized characters in comics. Following the web-head would be Captain America, Iron Man, and Wolverine. As a while Marvels first and second string bench is a fair bit more populated than DCs. The three you mentioned are the only three that the average person would recognize. The rest aren't all that mainstream.

- darkon_turas
( July 28th, 2009 | 3:41 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #13
Gravatar

I didn't mention Spider-Man, Wolverine etc. because their film rights are currently owned/held prisoner by Fox and not Marvel, meaning they won't have any chance at appearing in 'The Avengers' ensemble movie being produced by Marvel studios. It would be awesome if they were included but they can't, unless Marvel coughs up some money and makes some kind of an agreement with Fox which I don't see happening. DC's characters, on the other hand, all belong to WB which makes far better movies in terms of quality than Fox. They are planning tentpole Green Lantern and Flash movies and even have a script for a Green Arrow one, hoping these characters break out ala Iron Man. Not too shabby.

- Vik
( July 29th, 2009 | 9:18 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #14
Gravatar

@darkon_turas:

Just goes to show you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Marvel's 2nd stringers are far less well known than DC's. Ant Man? OMG…give me a break.

- Fred M
( August 1st, 2009 | 8:04 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #15
Gravatar

i will see edward norton as the hulk on iron man 2 and the avengres this is cool i like robert downey jr. don cheadle john cena chris hemsworth simon pegg edward norton scarlett johasson and samuel l. jackson i love them so much they will do a great job on these movies i like marvel im a marvel fan im in for it so i will see iron man 2 and the avengres in theatres see ya

- andries price
( August 3rd, 2009 | 6:49 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #16
Gravatar

Don't mean to be a killjoy and I love a lot of these actors but I am frankly bored by all of the testosterone. There is Scarlet Johansson, thank god, and she is an fabulous actress. I'm excited to see her in these films, but 1 female character vs. … how many men now? I just frankly think this franchise would be more interesting with more interesting female characters. I know we'll see a few here and there in the back ground for them (please, someone other than the stock "girlfriend" character). But I'd love to see a film where, you know, the main character superhero was a woman. A movie that isn't just about a woman in skimpy clothes (she can wear them, sure, but there has to be more to it than that). I'm sure these studios COULD make at least one kick ass, smart and funny movie with a female lead to rival these films featuring male superheros. And I think that would make the dynamics in The Avengers much more interesting.

I know they are going off of the comics, which have traditionally focused on the male leads, but there must be at least one interesting lead female in there they can create an interesting film for!

- Writtenby
( September 3rd, 2009 | 11:29 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #17
Gravatar

What is with all the dissing of Ant-Man? Ant-Man is just one of many personas of resident genius Hank Pym (Goliath, Giant-Man, Yellowjacket, Wasp) and without him, there really wouldn't be an Avengers team. If they're going to do the movie right, they'll include Hank Pym, if just for the sake of incluing Vision on the team and possibly utilizing Ultron as a villain, along with Janet Van Dyne as the Wasp. Then you'll have 2 females on the team (for the ladies) and you can delve a little into the abusive relationship she and Pym have, including Pym's jealousy/rivalry of the other brains on the team (Banner and Stark) and his poop temper. Of course, we're only looking at a 2 and half to 3 hour movie, so it would be difficult to work all of that in, though the extreme dichotomy would be nice as an underlying theme. I'm just saying that there's a lot more to "Ant-Man" than people give credit.

- shawn
( September 29th, 2009 | 8:04 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!