Filed under: Editorials

Manohla Dargis' Female Rant is Worthless Without Suggestions

It's hard to sell a problem if you have absolutely no solutions

Diaz in What Happens in Vegas

I have flamed "New York Times" critic Manohla Dargis before, but this time it is more about how she annoys me rather than how I find her unfit for her lofty position as reviewer of what is arguably the most notable newspaper in the land.

Today the "Times" went live with a Dargis rant headlined "Is There a Real Woman in This Multiplex?" which takes a look at the role females have, or don't have in this case, in this summer's list of films. She opens her piece saying:

IRON MAN, Batman, Big Angry Green Man — to judge from the new popcorn season it seems as if Hollywood has realized that the best way to deal with its female troubles is to not have any, women, that is.

She goes on to say what she believes to be the Hollywood thinking process, "Women can’t direct. Women can’t open movies. Women are a niche."

She points to such films as this summer's Wild Child, Mamma Mia!, Sex and the City and What Happens in Vegas and sloughs them off. Her opinion on those four in order are: "Malibu brat shipped off to boarding school"; "adaptation of the jukebox musical"; "four bosomy buddies are really gay men in drag"; "shrieks Brittany Murphy five years ago".

So, what is Dargis's solution to a Hollywood lacking leading women she can respect and cheer for?

Nothing.

This is like writing a rant about how gas is expensive, war in Iraq sucks and Nicolas Cage can't act and offering no solutions. Without solutions it's meaningless. On top of no solutions, at no point does Dargis ever tell us what she wants from Hollywood.

I would argue Tina Fey is a very big draw right now. Before my screening of Baby Mama I heard people in the audience saying something to the effect of, "It's Tina Fey, you gotta check it out." Why is Fey a draw? Because she is female, she is funny and she is smart. All of this attracts both genders. Women see her as a strong independent woman and men are attracted instantly to an intelligent and equally funny female. Fey is never sold on sex appeal, she is sold on talent. If Dargis wanted to offer up a solution she would point this out as she almost does when discussing Anna Faris in The House Bunny, but she goes off on some Brittany Murphy tangent that has nothing to do with her piece.

How often is a film with a female lead ever sold on wit and humor as opposed to looks? Hardly ever.

What Dargis needs to point out is that if she wants females to gain respect in Hollywood actresses such as Jessica Alba need to be banished from the cineplex. Trust me, the guys that are interested won't miss her one bit, they still have the Internet to fill their "needs".

I won't deny Hollywood is a male driven market, but it's a completely different medium than say books. However, look at the best-selling fiction books, they aren't necessarily female driven either. The current "New York Times Best Sellers List" for paperback fictions is a hodgepodge of this and that. I see "The Friday Night Knitting Club" on there, but if that title alone doesn't say "Make Me into a Movie" than I don't know what does.

Hollywood could make a She-Hulk movie or an Iron Woman, but would Dargis want to see that? Would anyone? Is that what she is asking for?

I don't know the answer, but at least I am searching for a solution after a few minutes of thought, which seems like a lot more than Dargis put into her piece.

You tell me. Is Hollywood too geared towards men? Do you know how they could improve on female roles in films?


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

She casts Wanted aside too despite that the whole marketing campaign has been geared around Jolie, which is counter to part of her argument. And while Sex and the City seems like the most pointless show-to-movie film ever created, her diminishing of it is laughable. Well that film is completely the antithesis of my argument, I guess I better downplay it. Her argument is sloppy and poorly presented. Also she doesn't even mention Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2, which again is contrary to whatever point she's trying to make

I don't deny that there are not as many good roles out there for woman. But that's an argument that can be well formed and presented. After reading this, I think she touches on it…but that's definitely not her focus. I don't know. She's all of the map here.

- davidfrank
( May 5th, 2008 | 8:33 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

To answer your question Brad,

Yes, I do think that Hollywood is skewed towards men, to a certain extent, but I kind of think it is more of the “this is what women like” and “this is what men like” than anything. Movies that are geared towards women are mostly romantic comedies (and I HATE romantic comedies). Big blockbusters are supposedly for men, but I know plenty of women, including myself, who loves these types of movies. I think that if Big Blockbusters had a woman superhero (whatever happened to Wonderwoman?) or more great female villians in Blockbusters, then the movie industry would be a bit better in terms of female roles. That’s really the only thing I can think of, beside the usual: Make more lead female roles in movies that can be geared towards anyone regardless of gender. I do agree with DavidFrank, she is dismissing the decent female roles that exist. Like Sex and the City ( never watched the show), a lot of women see this as a positive show for women. I also think that this is mainly a problem in comedies and big budget movies. As far as dramas or the serious movies, I think the roles for women are definitely better, but still limited.

Now since I am a woman of color, I wish there were more decent roles for women of color, besides the usual, wife/mother, Tyler Perry(ugh) and or sexy chick. A great solution for this would be novels. There are PLENTY of movies based on novels and there are plenty of NOVELS that have minority women as main characters ( I know Memoirs of a Geisha was a bad movie, but great book). That would be a great start.

- BeautifulM
( May 5th, 2008 | 2:06 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

the rant is worthless because it doesn't consider boxoffice and performance of the stars mentioned. it doesn't matter if you do art flicks to gain credibility if you cannot get butts in the seats to justify a hundred million dollar film and its accompanying salary. Hollywood isn't sexist, its just about the money. women superhero films have been tried, remember supergirl? i think we want to forget that! sheena? gag… catwoman? cripes.. elektra? aeon flux? well you see the trend…

and women directing such films? remember aeon flux? yes helmed by a woman.

david poland does a better job tearing into this puff piece. http://www.thehotbutton.com/today/hot.button/index.html new york times needs higher standards for journalism.

- bkjoe
( September 27th, 2008 | 4:48 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time ~ Trailer
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!