Filed under: Kudos to You

Hitchcock or Kubrick, Who Deserves an Oscar More?

Betcha didn't know neither one of them won one...

Hitchcock or Kubrick? Not as easy as you may think

I was checking out Kris Tapley's review of The Incredible Hulk since everyone seems to be batting it around as if it was passed down by God and will be added to the right wing's political strategy, and while on his site (InContention.com) I noticed a little poll he was running asking, "Which Oscarless director deserves it more? Alfred Hitchcock or Stanley Kubrick?" Quickly making my decision I clicked on Hitch's name and made my voice heard. The results popped up and to my surprise after 116 votes my 117th vote was the one that broke a tie between the two helmers (sorta cool).

Considering Tapley's site is probably read by more industry folks than casual moviegoers I thought it was interesting that such a question could be so close. I don't say this thinking Hitch is the obvious choice, but because I assumed there would be more like minded thinking people, but it appears this isn't an easy question at all.

Hitchcock was nominated for five Oscars, all for Best Director. They are for Psycho, Read Window, Spellbound, Lifeboat and Rebecca. Of course, he didn't win and is yet to receive a posthumous honorary award. As for Kubrick he was nominated for Best Director four times and Best Writing five times. On top of that Barry Lyndon, A Clockwork Orange, 2001 and Dr. Strangelove were all nominated for Best Picture. It should be mentioned that 2001 did win an Oscar for Best Effects, and while Kubrick is credited as Special Photographic Effects Designer/Director you can see on IMDb's page right here that he is sharing that award with a slew of people so I don't think it counts just as much as I don't think it really would have counted if he had won a shared Writing Oscar. Kubrick and Hitchcock were visionary directors first and foremost and that is pretty much the discussion that is on the table here.

Both Hitchcock and Kubrick brought so much to the world of filmmaking and it is strange to think neither one of them ever took home the golden hardware. Kubrick lived to be 70-years-old with his last film being Eyes Wide Shut (not counting his uncredited work on A.I.) and Hitch passed away at the age of 80 with his last film being the 1976 comedy/thriller Family Plot.

It was an interesting quesiton Tapley posed and I never thought people would be so split down the middle on it. I wonder, what do you guys think? Who deserves it more?


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Kubrick all the way.

- exposed film
( June 10th, 2008 | 5:18 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

The thing is, I won't even argue with you about it even though I picked Hitch. I could probably toss A Clockwork Orange (my favorite Kubrick) in the player right now and change my mind before throwing in Rear Window (my favorite Hitch flick) and changing it right back. It's a great topic though.

Care to elaborate on why you pull for Kubrick? If there is anything specific I would love to hear it. If I was to try and make a case for Hitch I would probably start with how many people try to emulate him.

- bradbrevet
( June 10th, 2008 | 5:27 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

I'd give it to Hitch since he didn't even get a non-directing or Lifetime Achievement Oscar.

And it is a crime against all things cinema that neither of these guys won a directing Oscar.

- oldskool138
( June 10th, 2008 | 7:54 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

The best answer, to me, is no answer. Why should we have to choose? Both deserved the Oscar, probably more than the majoirty who have won them, and it is a crime neither of them ever recieved the honor from the Academy.

But what about the other people who never got an Academy Award? Orson Welles, Charlie Chaplin, Cary Grant, John Frankenheimer, Catherine Deneuve, Rita Hayworth, Richard Burton, Peter O'Toole, Montgomery Clift, Deborah Kerr, Robert Altman, James Earl Jones, Barbara Stawyck, Lauren Bacall, Gordon Willis (cinematographer behind works like "All the President's Men," "Manhattan" and two small pictures you probably never have heard of – "The Godfather" and "The Godfather Part II"), Marlene Dietrich, Glenn Close, Ingmar Bergman, Howard Hawks, Roberto Rossellini, Marilyn Monroe, Ava Gardner and Greta Garbo are all on this list.

An Oscar is an extremely imperfect barometer of both talent and of staing power. Just ask F. Murray Abraham and Marlee Matlin.

- SaraMichelle
( June 10th, 2008 | 12:57 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

You have to choose because that is the question? :)

- bradbrevet
( June 10th, 2008 | 1:13 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

I have to say Kubrick. There few other directors in the history of cinema who have achieved such a singular and consistent worldview as Kubrick. His films are very philosophically deep – they say something about everything, war, crime, relationships, humanity etc. And they are entertaining. And no one can say Hitch ever made a film as profound and awe-inspiring as 2001. Its a shame Kubrick didn't win best director for that.

- Kenjo
( March 16th, 2009 | 11:45 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

I have to say Kubrick. All of his films show the true human nature of man and their inner fights and all them are very philosofical. Alfred was good in suspense and all, but his work is not as deep as Kubricks

- Ricardo Martinez
( May 12th, 2009 | 6:51 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!