Filed under: Legal Woes

Fox Looks to Delay Release of 'Watchmen'

Can't say I blame them...

I know the big trend is to pile on Fox due to the awful movies they released in 2008 and seem to have been releasing over the past few years, but when it comes to this Watchmen lawsuit I can't say I blame them. When you are talking about material rights it is a pretty serious situation and considering the amound of money Warner Bros. is hoping to make off the filmed adaptation currently slated for a March 6 release Fox would be stupid not to make sure they are justly compensated for the material they supposedly own. It's the fault of Warner Bros. for not taking care of the situation a long time ago.

The news the headline refers to involves a sit down ruling U.S. District Court Judge Gary Feess had with the attorneys for both sides on Monday in which Feess is reported as saying, "I thought we ought to talk. I have spent more time than I think you can imagine working on your case at a time when I didn’t expect to be working on it," reports Michael Cieply at the New York Times.

Feess ruled last week that 20th Century Fox has distribution rights to Watchmen after suing Warner Bros. in February claiming the studio never fully relinquished story rights from its deal made in the late 1980s.

The "Times" continues to mention how once things began to heat up, fingers pointed from all sides at Lawrence Gordon, the veteran producer who brought the film to Warner after failed attempts over the years to make it with Fox, Universal Pictures, and then Paramount. Fox contends Gordon failed in an obligation to offer the movie to them when director Zack Snyder (300) became involved.

Warner's lawyers argued that Mr. Gordon and his lawyers had signed over rights to "Watchmen" without mentioning a crucial agreement between a company Mr. Gordon controlled and Fox. Also, they said that if anyone still owed a buyout fee to Fox, it was Mr. Gordon.

As far as all the legal mumbo-jumbo goes I am clueless, but I can't imagine Fox holds some sort of rights to the material. I don't see how delaying the release date would benefit their suit, even though I do see how the threat of delaying the release could put Warner Bros. into a corner.

The hearing scheduled for Jan. 20 will decide whether the release of the film should be blocked. So put it on your Google Calendars now and stay tuned. You can get the full "New York Times" report here.

Related post categories: Legal Woes :

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

I'm still Boycotting Fox.

At least until I know the final ruling.

- Phobia
( December 30th, 2008 | 8:18 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

I still think this is a dick move on Fox's part. They are doing nothing but piss off the fans. I know I am a bit "unstable" upon hearing this news, but rights or no rights, Fox is in a position where they can and will have a lot of people after their heads if this movie gets pushed back, even by a week.

My deal is that I will not see another movie from Fox until I see Watchmen!

- NackAttack
( December 30th, 2008 | 8:32 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

I understand trying to protect your rights and everything but this really upsets me. For every day this movie gets delayed somebody will die… or I'll write an infammatory imdb post, whatever works.

- Thera Pitts
( December 30th, 2008 | 10:32 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

I think Fox should be awarded the amount they originally paid for the rights and that's it. They did nothing with the property for 20 years, their own damn loss. I'm also boycotting Fox until they let us see this movie. Not going to be any huge loss, really, their movies all suck.

Also, what's the betting that if they block release entirely, the movie will instantly be leaked by WB?

- aerinpegadrak
( December 30th, 2008 | 11:41 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

What?!!?! That can't be true! Damn! I hate Fox! Why would they wanna change it?!?!!? Goddd!

- Sebastian
( December 30th, 2008 | 12:44 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

I can't believe that they would delay the movie? What does that do for them besides piss off more fans? As a rabid fan of Watchmen myself, I will be devastated if they delay the release.

Well, best thing I can do is put on my smiley face button and wait.

- Nina
( December 31st, 2008 | 1:25 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

if they block the release WB will defiantly leak it i mean wow 20th century fox doesn't even have that great of movies.
3 words screw you fox!

- jim
( December 31st, 2008 | 1:34 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

It's lousy Karma that Fox is seemingly in the cat birds seat, but its something you just can't take away from them and live with the idea that the arrogance of a few and the selfishness of many should pervert the justice or the law of the land. The irony or not is that it's over a bit of entertainment, a fantasy, that might itself say as much about the core of mans problems, as the settlement over its own distribution.

- T-Boy
( January 2nd, 2009 | 10:27 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

Don't be mad if Watchman gets delayed everyone. You can go see the Hannah Montana movie on April 10! Ta-Ha! I only payed to see one movie last year, The Dark Knight! And I will only pay to see one movie this year, AVATAR! I can't understand how people spend real money to see a bunch of sequels & remakes! But I guess it's true, movie studios know that people are stupid & will pay to see WHATEVER they release. Smart business move!

- Doom
( January 4th, 2009 | 12:31 am )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!