Filed under: Movie News

Fox Does it Again: Luhrmann Forced to Alter 'Australia' Ending

Hey, look, Fox has no idea what's going on...

Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman in Australia
Photo: 20th Century Fox
THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS A SPOILER FOR THE END OF AUSTRALIA.

I recently had an idea to post an article headlined "Guess the Studio". I was going to then describe a series of situations based on actual events while hiding the true identity of any film or person involved and see if people would guess it was in fact 20th Century Fox that was being described. Here is a studio that seems to have zero respect for artistic opinion and the suits over there seem to believe they have the answer to everything. This year Fox has delivered such piles as:

  • Deception
  • Jumper
  • What Happens in Vegas
  • The Happening
  • The X-Files: I Want to Believe
  • Max Payne

And those are just the titles I saw. They wouldn't even screen Babylon A.D., Shutter or Mirrors and I wasn't even going to brave 27 Dresses or Meet the Spartans. As it stands Dr. Seuss' Horton Hears a Who! is their best film this year and when that title is given to an animated feature you know there is trouble, at least when we are talking about one of the majors.

The Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman starrer, Australia, is Fox's last chance for a winner was in the hands of Baz Luhrmann (Moulin Rouge!) and it seems Fox decided to take it out of Baz's hands only to give it back to him after pressure to change the ending.

News being reported by both The Guardian and News.com.au tells us Luhrmann agreed to rewrite the final scenes to keep alive The Drover, Kidman's love interest, played by Hugh Jackman. The decision came "after 'intense' discussions with officials at 20th Century Fox" reports Richard Luscombe at "The Guardian".

The decision is said to have been made after negative responses following initial test screenings in which one reviewer is quoted saying, "There is no reason to kill off Wolvie." Considering the person being quoted refers to Jackman's character as he is known in the X-Men franchise of films leads me to believe they are not the target audience for an epic drama, but what do I know? I am not some egomaniacal studio executive who shits gold.

The Herald Sun story is far more harsh on the film from the perspective of those that saw the test screening, which apparently was met with what the article refers to as "disastrous reviews." One person referring to it as "an action-filled tragedy."

As with all decisions made at Fox nowadays the move came since they felt it would bolster box-office to play for a happy ending. Strangely enough the film is being compared to Titanic in size, scope and content. A film where the boat sinks and just about everyone dies. Perhaps Paramount should have kept it afloat and changed history. Now that would have been interesting.

It will be HILARIOUS if the original ending is made available on the DVD. Fox LOVES those Unrated DVDs, but if you have a choice between watching a version where Jackman dies at the end and one where he doesn't which one do you choose? "Now on DVD, the Australia too intense for theaters. Choose the fate of The Drover, his life is in your hands!!!!" With Don LaFontaine deceased who do we get to read such magical lines?

I recently learned I am seeing the film next Wednesday and I truly hope it is as good as I want it to be. It would be nice to have another epic love story and hopefully Fox didn't ruin this one completely. The film opens in theaters on November 26. For more information click here.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

You know studio's, if they think a happy ending can bring in more money than that's what's gonna happen.
Even in the current economic environment the dollar is still more powerfull than integrity and respect.

- RaTTleR_NL
( November 10th, 2008 | 7:30 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

Thats bullshit ! Fox has destroyed the theaters enough with its garbage movies why does it have to destroy somebodys' creation… It's a story like any other book on the shelves you can just stop production of the book and force the author to change the ending. They should keep it the way it is and let Baz Luhrmann do his thing.

- ranman14
( November 10th, 2008 | 3:45 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

What surprises me about this is that Baz has been an incredibly successful director for Fox with both "Romeo + Juliet" and "Moulin Rouge!" and in BOTH movies at least one of the main characters dies at the end, so neither of them are happy tales. MR! even garnered a Best Picture nomination. So, I don't understand. Why screw with a director who has brought so much success to you anyways, regardless of the ending? Not to mention, audiences aren't going to know what the ending is before seeing the movie.

- IsItThursdayYet
( November 10th, 2008 | 9:28 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

I am surprised to hear that they made him change the ending . Cause after seeing the film I do agree, that killing off Hugh Jackman might have been more dramatic . Especially in the sense of love being so hard to keep a hold of,and the stupid things people will do for love. I can totally see where they would have had him die off in the film . It has to stink to have people tell you what is best for your own film. Too bad they couldn't get more consulting on Max Payne the absolute bore of the year.

- italkfilm
( November 22nd, 2008 | 7:54 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

I saw this movie this weekend and it's pretty good. It's a bit too long and has some rather predictable story lines that don't add much. Regarding the ending? Fox made the RIGHT decision. The story would not hang together if he dies. There is no good reason to kill him off.

My big problem with the movie is that it didn't know what it wanted to be. Did it want to be a grand love story, a story about good triumphing over evil, or a sad commentary on how the Aussi government treated the aborigines? It does a good job on the first, a mediocre job on the second and an interesting job on the third.

- BobH
( December 15th, 2008 | 9:41 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time ~ Trailer
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!