hot movie previews > The Twilight Saga: E...LegionNineArmoredKick-AssRemember MeDear John
 
Filed under: Movie News

Don't Expect 'Justice League' too Soon

Also, looks like Singer's Superman has died

Variety's Anne Thompson posted an interesting little tidbit on her blog today with regards to the world of DC Comics and films relating to Superman, Batman and the hot topic Justice League. It seems she has it on good information that Bryan Singer will not be returning to direct Man of Steel, the long talked about follow-up to Singer's Superman Returns, as Singer is expected to begin work on The Mayor of Castro Street following Valkyrie. As a matter of fact, the Man of Steel movie may be thrown on the back burner and left to simmer as Justice League is the most likely place fans will be seeing Superman any time soon, but even with that project "soon" is relative word.

Thompson goes on to say that Justice League will likely not be shot, however, until after the WGA strike is resolved. This doesn't come as a huge surprise considering Warner Bros. has always been quite careful with their superhero films since the final two installments in the first Batman franchise.

Speaking of Batman, the whole article was prompted by Thompson's run in with The Dark Knight helmer Christopher Nolan at a Christmas party in the Hollywood Hills. She goes on to say that Warners is so happy with Dark Knight that their fondest hope is that Nolan will return to do another Batman.

Ahhh, isn't that the hope we all have? Just make sure the idea of a Justice League movie featuring a different Batman doesn't spoil his mood.

Related post categories: Uncategorized : , ,

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

Ok, now the Justice League movie really needs to be destroyed. Say what you want about Superman Returns (I liked it a lot, deduct cool points if you must), I think at the very least it's pretty undeniable Routh was a perfect heir to Reeve. Plus Routh is an Iowa boy (which doesn't necessarily mean I root for him, since I can't stand Ashton Kutcher) but i know some good friends of his who still speak to him very regularly and from all accounts he's a rather nice guy and a pretty big geek. So that pretty much puts me in his cheering corner. Damn, just when I thought the idea of the Justice League movie couldn't piss me off any more.

- davidfrank
( January 3rd, 2008 | 7:41 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

Personally I didn't like Superman Returns, but I like Singer's approach in making it more of an actual movie rather than just another throwaway superhero film, and actually I thought Routh was the best part of the film. For those reasons I was looking forward to Man of Steel from Singer, but I am having a really hard time supporting the Justice League film. I just think it is far too big of a venture to handle at a reasonable budget. Movies with one superhero cost enough, I can't even imagine how much an ensemble superhero film would cost.

- bradbrevet
( January 3rd, 2008 | 7:47 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

I think a Justice League movie is too big of an idea to make cinematic. You have several characters with weird backgrounds (I'm not saying origin stories are needed, but how do you explain the bizarre background of Wonder Woman or The Green Lantern mixed with Batman and Superman without the film feeling tonally clumsy and overall half-baked?). Even the 1st 2 X-men movies (which I both like a lot, actually I love X2) weren't completely successful at this. Justice League works for comic books b/c the characters are from several other publications that play into the same continuity. You don't need exposition. The first film of any franchise shouldn't expect cultural osmosis to do a majority of the lifting in regards to creating its reality and characters…and I just have the feeling that this film will ask of the audience. And I just don't see how this film can work within 2 hours without coming off really silly and the characters being paper thin. I think solo superhero stories are best suited for cinema and superhero groups are best left on paper.–Although I'd kill to see a cinematic adaptation of Marvels, which would be perfect for film since it's full of superheroes but its main characters are normal people watching the action unfold.

- davidfrank
( January 4th, 2008 | 7:34 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

I completely agree. Having that many superheroes in one movie is just not feasible considering movie budgets. The only way to do it is to create an animated Justice League, which considering today's animation wouldn't be that bad of an idea. Imagine if Blue Sky went ahead and made a Justice League film or if Hayao Miyazaki made an anime version. That would be worth seeing.

- bradbrevet
( January 7th, 2008 | 3:11 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!