Filed under: Home Video News

Blu-ray Review: Doomsday

What a disappointment from a director we expect more from

Neil Marshall directed one of the better horror films I have ever seen in the 2006 release The Descent. I have yet to see his 2002 effort, Dog Soldiers, but it is in the Netflix queue and I am anxious to check it out as I have heard plenty of good things. Therefore, it is a wonder how the wheels fell off the train so bad as to bring us Doomsday, a nightmare of a film best described as 28 Days Later meets Resident Evil meets Mad Max. Even though the story line is incredibly generic and vastly played, there was room for success had Marshall made a few different decisions.

The premise of the film is that 25 years ago an epidemic hit Scotland infecting people with an incurable virus causing them to bubble up grotesquely and die. The disease was highly communicable and the solution was to completely wall off all of Scotland and let the disease kill itself off. The idea proved successful until one day what has become known as the Reaper virus surfaces outside the walls.

Satellite imagery shows that inside the walls there are still people living, leading authorities to believe they may have found a cure as a known scientist was left inside. In an attempt to stop the virus, save humanity and make a name for themselves an elite team is sent in to search for the cure. This is where it all goes wrong.

The Blu-ray is certainly a bonus to a confused viewer as we enter the quarantined zone and are greeted to two different societies. The first is a Mad Max-esque group known as Marauders. These folks have taken to '80s style punk rock tattoos and mohawks. They enjoy a good bit of cannibalism as well as "Good Thing" by the Fine Young Cannibals, a track from 1991. On the other side we have the medieval group. These guys like to ride horses and play castle. Considering the outbreak occurred in 2008 and the film takes place in 2033 you would expect neither of these outcomes… So what gives?

Well, the fancy Blu-ray U-Control feature known as the "Reaper Files" tells us the Marauders took a liking to the punk rock of the era they were stranded in (uh, 2008 punk rock?) and as for the cannibalism, that was initially a survival tactic, but now it is a ritual and just plain good fun. As for the kings and queens, they decide to apparently go back to their roots, as any stranded survivor of a deadly plague would. Basically, anyone inside the wall lost their senses and one decided to become the '80s rock band Poison and eat people, while the other thought the solution was to hole up in a castle and play the Crusades. It just doesn't make sense and since it is the primary source of tension an audience is left to scratch their head and wonder… Why?

What 2008 punk rock band was popular enough to emulate? Why after 25 years do these guys still have gas? Why have they designated this nut job Sol as their leader? Who the hell listens to the Fine Young Cannibals? Why does Sol have a leathered up gimp (seriously)? Why does the chick with the crazy tats on her face say nothing and just wag her tongue as she cooks a dude on the open flame? Absolutely none of it makes sense.

The other features on the Blu-ray U-Control feature a picture-in-picture behind the scenes look which replaces any kind of generic featurettes, which is a welcomed idea and hopefully a model future releases will follow as it is better served to do this than just repeat the information all over again. There is also a "Tech Specs" feature which is basically a bit of gloss as it shows information on some of the vehicles in the film – no harm, no foul, no need. Finally there is a commentary with Marshall and a few other nobodies that does nothing in terms of offering up any kind of story decision information as they simply marvel at the gore and point out the moments when their wives are featured as extras in the film.

Unrated or not, lots of gore or none, Doomsday is a mess and it is no surprise Universal buried it and probably regrets picking it up in the first place. Don't buy this disc and if you must watch it, give it a rental, you won't find need to return to it ever again after that.

Stay up to date with everything Home Video related from reviews, release dates and newly announced DVDs and Blu-ray Discs in the RopeofSilicon Home Video Central.
Related post categories: Blu-ray, Home Video News, Reviews :

Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

I was most definitely disappointed by this…it was just plain stupid…lots of decent ideas, but doesnt deliver on anything…its just sorta there….

While Im one of the few horror fans who hasnt seen The Descent yet, I LOVE Dog Soldiers, one of the most underrated horror films ever, in my opinion. Good acting and some great practical special effects and gore.

- ckybltz
( July 20th, 2008 | 9:32 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

ckybltz said: While Im one of the few horror fans who hasnt seen The Descent yet, I LOVE Dog Soldiers, one of the most underrated horror films ever, in my opinion. Good acting and some great practical special effects and gore.

You must check out The Descent, there is one scene in there especially that almost makes you feel claustrophobic it is pulled off so well. A definite must see!

- bradbrevet
( July 20th, 2008 | 9:50 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

It's funny that horror fans are disappointed by this. For one, it's not a horror film. It's a loving tribute to 80's sci-fi B-movies. ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK is the main influence here, even the title font is the same as all of John Carpenter films. Tyler Bates score is also very much in vein with Carpenter's scores as well. And at the end there is a great homage to THE ROAD WARRIOR. While not perfect, this is a love letter to cheesy movies from the 80's. Of course it doesn't make sense, it shouldn't have to when it's trying to be like a B-movie. Some people just didn't get it.

- Lobot
( July 21st, 2008 | 5:53 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

Lobot said: It's funny that horror fans are disappointed by this. For one, it's not a horror film. It's a loving tribute to 80's sci-fi B-movies. ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK is the main influence here, even the title font is the same as all of John Carpenter films. Tyler Bates score is also very much in vein with Carpenter's scores as well. And at the end there is a great homage to THE ROAD WARRIOR. While not perfect, this is a love letter to cheesy movies from the 80's. Of course it doesn't make sense, it shouldn't have to when it's trying to be like a B-movie. Some people just didn't get it.

I agree. While it won't win any oscars or critical praises, it was entertaining. There is no need for thinking when watching this movie; which can be exactly what some people want when popping in a flick (hence the point of B-movies). Just as Max became a hero to many when The Road Warrior hit theaters, Sinclair did for me – she kicks ass!

Bottomline, although the acting left something to be desired, most of the rules go out the window when it comes to B movies. Everyone has their opinions, and critically this doesn't rank, but it was fun and will definitely find a place in my movie library.

- melsgirl
( July 21st, 2008 | 11:54 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

melsgirl said: I agree. While it won't win any oscars or critical praises, it was entertaining. There is no need for thinking when watching this movie; which can be exactly what some people want when popping in a flick (hence the point of B-movies).

The only problem with that logic is that the Blu-ray actually offers the tools for the user to do the thinking you say is not necessary.

In almost every single movie each piece has been meticulously thought out by the filmmaker including why these guys are punk rockers, why they have turned to cannibalism and obviously based on that why they listen to the Fine Young Cannibals. So to say you shouldn't think is to go against the filmmakers intentions because they certainly thought about it a lot.

- bradbrevet
( July 21st, 2008 | 12:17 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

That makes sense and I understand your thinking. However, my referral to "not thinking" is generic in the sense that I, as a moviegoer, don't HAVE to think when watching the movie – regardless of whether or not the director, producer, writer, etc want or expect me to. If they expect that to happen, then they really should put more time and thought into the details of the movie.

These types of movies don't get critical acclaim, and shouldn't.

I'm not disagreeing with your assessment from a "critic's standing," I just think – in my opinion – that it should be stated the movie is still entertaining. I would never go to a movie, such as this one, with an expectation of thought provoking entertainment; however, if it would have happened, it have been a bonus.

- melsgirl
( July 21st, 2008 | 3:08 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

melsgirl said: I just think – in my opinion – that it should be stated the movie is still entertaining.

And that is why the comment system is here. After all, my opinion isn't the only one that matters. :)

- bradbrevet
( July 21st, 2008 | 3:39 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!