Bigelow's Next is an International Organized Crime Actioner
Will it simply be another limited release?
Photo: Summit Entertainment
Variety is reporting director Kathryn Bigelow is once again teaming with The Hurt Locker scripter Mark Boal for an action-adventure feature called Triple Frontier, with Charles Roven, Alex Gartner and Steve Alexander producing through Atlas Entertainment.
The article doesn't reveal an actual plot line, but it does say the film will be et in the notorious border zone between Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil where the Igazu and Parana rivers converge — making "la triple frontera" difficult to monitor and a haven for organized crime.
Boal is still writing the script, but Roven hopes to begin production on Triple Frontier next year.
As of right now, Bigelow's Hurt Locker is doing good business at the box-office considering its still-limited release, but the fact it isn't doing gangbusters prompted Roger Ebert to write a curious editorial headlined "The gathering Dark Age" that delivers this following barb:
Certainly most of those who see "The Hurt Locker" become enthusiastic advocates of the film; but apparently those younger viewers who have seen it haven't had much of an influence on their peers. While the success of the film continues to grow as it steadily increases its number of theaters, the majority of younger filmgoers are missing this boat. Why is that? They don't care about reviews, perhaps. They also resist a choice that is not in step with their peer group. Having joined the crowd at "Transformers," they're making their plans to see "G. I. Joe." Some may have heard about "The Hurt Locker," but simply lack the nerve to suggest a movie choice that involves a departure from groupthink.
He goes on to mention the "the dumbing-down of America," which coincidentally has me harkening back to my "Are General Audiences Too Stupid to Enjoy Smart Movies?" editorial from a week back and Ebert's theory is that "it proceeds from a lack of curiosity and, in many cases, a criminally useless system of primary and secondary education. Until a few decades ago, almost all high school graduates could read a daily newspaper. The issue today is not whether they read a daily paper, but whether they can."
Strangely enough this brings up something I read over at The Huffington Post (via Hollywood Elsewhere) from Bill Maher saying:
I'm the bad guy for saying it's a stupid country, yet polls show that a majority of Americans cannot name a single branch of government, or explain what the Bill of Rights is. 24% could not name the country America fought in the Revolutionary War. More than two-thirds of Americans don't know what's in Roe v. Wade. Two-thirds don't know what the Food and Drug Administration does. Some of this stuff you should be able to pick up simply by being alive. You know, like the way the Slumdog kid knew about cricket.
Are the days of high quality film ending as the public's need for immediacy and lack of desire to be intellectually challenged could possibly prompt a continued decline in well-funded thought out films? Surely Public Enemies didn't help the argument for most camps. Are the good films destined for 535 theaters while the latest blockbusters continue to open in 4,007, which was the discrepancy between G.I. Joe and The Hurt Locker this weekend? I think these are both worthy questions, but I'm not sure anyone has the answer, and if you do I can only assume it is to say we should expect more G.I. Joe and less Hurt Locker. Sadly, I wouldn't be able to disagree with you.
If you want to read more, Ebert references two other articles. Both are from the Los Angeles Times, the first is John Horn's article headlined "'The Hurt Locker' defies the odds" and the second is from Patrick Goldstein headlined "'At the Movies' swats away its flyweight critics".










