Filed under: Editorials

2008 Continues to 'Stand Still' for 20th Century Fox – Will 2009 be Any Better?

A by-the-numbers look at a studio that struggled this year

Once again it appears 20th Century Fox has a film that won't be breaking any box-office records as their late-2008 sci-fi blockbuster The Day the Earth Stood Still earned $12.5 million on Friday and looks like it probably won't reach even the mid-to-upper $30 million mark many predicted and certainly not the overwhelming $55.2 million our Box-Office Oracle Laremy Legel assumed it would take in. At this point I'm sure Fox is just waiting for 2008 to end as this has been one of the worst years for a major studio that I can remember. Their biggest hits are an animated flick (Horton Hears a Who) and the awful comedy What Happens in Vegas.

I am sure they were hoping The Day the Earth Stood Still would at least drum up some of the support last year's I Am Legend managed in the same frame when it earned $77.2 million in three days, but Keanu Reeves doesn't have the same star power as Will Smith and the movie itself doesn't help matters. It looks like Marley and Me will be the studio's last chance for a live-action film to reach the $100 million mark and considering the marketing for that film coupled with the downer ending I don't see that happening. To put it into comparison, Fox has no chance at reaching the coveted $1 billion mark domestically this year if you take all of its films together. Using Box-Office Mojo's numbers as of the posting of this article here is how the studio totals breakdown as of right now:

  1. Paramount/Dreamworks $1,492,912,903
  2. Sony/Screen Gems $1,173,996,293
  3. Warner Bros. $1,062,227,476
  4. Universal $975,347,107
  5. Disney $821,312,467
  6. Fox $772,920,401
  7. Lionsgate $412,006,352
  8. New Line (Warner Bros.) $402,914,595
  9. Summit $197,745,735
  10. Focus Features $80,383,617
  11. MGM/Weinstein $71,826,954
  12. Fox Searchlight $69,386,519
  13. Weinstein $43,537,287

Depending on how you count New Line Cinema as it was absorbed by Warner Bros. in 2008 Paramount/DreamWorks and Warner Bros. are hotly contesting for that #1 spot. Sony has done surprisingly well considering they have had a whole slew of crap this year, but Hancock performed well beyond its quality earning $227 million and currently sitting as the fourth highest grossing film of 2008. Universal has had a decent year with several films (four to be exact) ranging from the $102-143 million mark, no big blockbusters unless you count the overseas exploits of Mamma Mia!.

Summit obviously busted out of the box as $142 million of its $197 million are due to the success of Twilight, which only opened a few weeks ago and is expected to see its sequel, New Moon, going into pre-production possibly as early as next week with Chris Weitz (American Pie and About a Boy) at the helm. They also have an interesting 2009 slate with Push, Knowing and New Moon at the end of the year, which will test how long they plan to stick around.

Lionsgate, like Fox, had a terrible year even though they had a few decent films such as The Bank Job, Rambo and the curiosity behind W. However, decisions like Disaster Movie, Transporter 3 and the insistence of releasing more films in the Saw franchise shows they are studio with very little imagination.

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
Photo: 20th Century Fox

However, the big story remains 20th Century Fox, a studio that has had a tough time over the last few years. Taking a look back at the last five years I could only come up with 12 films I would say were either considered good or worthy of conversation, and I feel I was incredibly generous in my choices:

  • Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)
  • X2 (2003)
  • I, Robot (2004)
  • The Passion of the Christ (2004)
  • In Her Shoes (2005)
  • Walk the Line (2005)
  • Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005)
  • Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith (2005)
  • Kingdom of Heaven (2005)
  • Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan (2006)
  • The Simpsons Movie (2007)
  • Live Free or Die Hard (2007)
  • Horton Hears a Who! (2008)

There are certainly some good movies in there, but to say there are an overwhelming amount of bonafide hits would be stretching the truth to the Nth degree, and I only included Kingdom of Heaven because I love the director's cut so much.

This is the studio that brought us Oscar Best Picture nominees such as Moulin Rouge, Titanic, Working Girl, The Verdict, All That Jazz, The French Connection, Patton, The Hustler and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. What has happened? This is a studio with an opening studio logo and theme song that makes your ears perk up as soon as you hear it… at least it used to. Now it is an endless stream of films they either hide from the reviewing press (Mirrors, Babylon A.D.) and others they should have (Deception, Max Payne).

Of course, I am not the only one noticing all of this. A recent post at Hollywood-Elsewhere brings about this bit of second hand commentary:

20th Century Fox, a friend tells me, is a pensive, unhappy place to be right now. "Agents all say they're the studio of last resort, they don't pay money, and Rupert Murdoch has said they're all on a lifeboat and there are going to be radical changes there. He's unhappy, and when he gets this way he fires people." The friend points out that the contact of Fox president/COO Peter Chernin "has been up for weeks and he still hasn't renewed it. I think he and [Fox Filmed Entertainment chairman] Tom Rothman might leave."

As often is the case in trying times, a regime change may be in order, but I am not ready to take rumors and speculation as solid intel, but it wouldn't surprise me if everything mentioned above was true.

However, I will give Fox some credit for a pair of films in 2008 as they let M. Night Shyamalan do his thing with The Happening and despite the negative mumbo-jumbo behind Australia, Baz Luhrmann is on record saying it is the film he wanted to release. Too bad both films turned out to be no good, and of course to varying degrees depending on who you ask.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Photo: 20th Century Fox

I am not sure if there are decision makers at the top of the food chain that just don't get it. Did the writers' strike impact them more than other studios? What is it? Will 2009 be an improvement? Let's see… In 2009 we have the following films confirmed for release:

Anything catch your eye?

Of course we all can't wait for James Cameron's Avatar, but that film is just over a year away and I don't think Fox wants to wait that long. I personally dug the new trailer for X-Men Origins: Wolverine and I think it is definitely going to be well over $200 million following X-Men: The Last Stand's $234 million in 2006.

The first Night at the Museum earned a whopping $250 million so the sequel should help. The Fantastic Mr. Fox comes from Wes Anderson based on a Roald Dahl novel and certainly peaks my interest. The Chipmunk sequel bores me but the first one made $217 million. I don't think Dragonball Evolution, They Came from Upstairs or Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li should expect anything more than the $40 million Max Payne and Hitman made unless they end up being bonafide good films and they aren't looking too peachy. Oh, and with The Rock in Tooth Fairy they may be able to drum up another $90 million like Game Plan made in 2007.

Monetarily 2009 may not be that bad of a year as the first nine films on the slate include a trio of mediocre flicks and five they could potentially knock it out of the park. Hell, the numbers I gave total $911 million without anything credited to The Fantastic Mr. Fox and especially Avatar. Obviously that is assuming the sequels do as well as the first film, but we are only talking about seven films here folks. And the eighth will be a boom or bust and the ninth is a film people have been waiting for for almost 11 years!

However, outside of Avatar I'm not seeing anything all that new from the studio. Sure, they may make money but isn't it also nice when they are actually good and bring something to filmmaking on a whole? At least Australia was a risk, something the studio needs to take more of. Their films have become such glossy, candy-coated regurgitations it is hard to tell one from the other. I will say this, at least they dumped those crappy spoof movies off as Lionsgate distributed Disaster Movie and now Paramount is set to sludge away on Dance Flick. Movies like that would only add insult to injury at this point. Hopefully with Fox's release of Meet the Spartans in January of 2008 that was the end of that trash for the studio and they are on to bigger and better things, because, quite frankly, I am tired of not liking their movies.


Click Here to add an
Avatar to Your Account
Post #1
Gravatar

lol are you crazy Brad? Fans are going to see Dragonball: Evolution regardless how bad it looks, trust me it will make a lot money.

- Mikey
( December 13th, 2008 | 4:04 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #2
Gravatar

I have high hopes for Fantastic Mr. Fox and Wolverine…Cameron should be able to sell Avatar to audiences without the help of Fox….I really think the studio has a history of executives who care more about marketing rather than telling a story or making a quality picture…If you notice the only movies in their lineup that look interesting are ones from acclaimed directors…the other projects look like they were focusing on DVD trends rather than understanding what moviegoers will watch…they're trying to hit that 7-12 year old market and it's not working if you notice not one of the movies are R, meaning not for highschool kids or adults…It's a big mistake only making PG and PG-13 films….they are ignoring a large part of the market and their numbers prove this..It doesn't help a lot of directors are turned off by the studio interfering during production

- Christopher Marc
( December 13th, 2008 | 5:29 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #3
Gravatar

If street fighter is half decent, it should do better than you think its been around a long time and if it looks decent it will draw a lot of old fans

Good article

- Aly
( December 13th, 2008 | 5:48 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #4
Gravatar

@Christopher Marc: You bring up what I was trying to get at when I called their films "glossy, candy-coated regurgitations" … and I agree completely. It feels like they set out to make a group of PG-13 movies that can then be sold with the tag "Unrated" on DVD and simply dupe the audience into seeing it once in theaters based on hype (Hitman, Max Payne) and then get them again with the promise of an "Unrated" DVD which fans hope will be the film they wanted in the first place. When neither scenario works out it just makes people more and more upset.

Then there is the issue that, outside of Australia, none of their movies branch out of that teenage genre. The idea of Fox making another film like Master and Commander, Kingdom of Heaven or Walk the Line just doesn't seem possible. Even their next big film is a sci-fi film, keeping very much in the fanboy tradition.

- Brad Brevet (Post Author)
( December 13th, 2008 | 5:54 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #5
Gravatar

@Brad Brevet: Agreed. Except, I would suggest Fox didn't make Kingdom of Heaven, at least not the cut we still talk about 3 years later. Fox's original Weinstein-esque theatrical release earned returns on par with Max Payne and Hitman, despite being 'from the director of Gladiator'.

Mind if a make a submission to your last 5 years list…
Man on Fire (2004). $77.9 mill domestic isn't bad for an R rated flick (14A in Canada) with a runtime of 146mins.

- GregM
( December 13th, 2008 | 9:44 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #6
Gravatar

@Aly:
I am really hoping to see Avatar, been honest, I'm dying to see it. I'm with you Brad in the Dragonball thing, it won't make much money but not as less as Max Payne. Wolverine will hit the 175 million bar surely, I'm not sure about the 200. Night at the Museum will be a succes, that's for sure and They Came for Upstairs, Street Fighter, I don't see much in them, I mean, no luck for them…

- Sebastian
( December 13th, 2008 | 10:29 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #7
Gravatar

I think that the future of Fox depends on Avatar.

- Tomás
( December 13th, 2008 | 11:54 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #8
Gravatar

No, you are wrong. Trust me, Dragon Ball will make a lot of money, considering it is the most watched anime ever. In USA, it is not very known, but if you go to Japan, Europe or South America you will see the real thing.

Dragon Ball will make probably the same succes than Wolverine, or maybe more.

- Jonhy Briants
( December 13th, 2008 | 1:06 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #9
Gravatar

It may be a hugely popular anime series, but the only buzz out there for the movie is negative. At least Twilight fans were excited about their movie; everyone thinks Dragonball looks like shit. It may become the most pirated movie ever, perhaps, but I don't think many people are going to bother seeing it in theatres.

- aerinpegadrak
( December 14th, 2008 | 12:59 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #10
Gravatar

Dragonball is gonna make alot of money, maybe not in its U.S. release but worldwide it will do fantastic, South America is crazy for it as is Japan. Dragonball fans have been waiting for a movie so long, with all those talks before and rumors through the years, fans will see it no matter how bad it is.

Also like to point out Fox is making a video game based off flick and action figures, they wouldnt be investing so much unless they thought it was gonna be a success. I have faith in the movie to a certain degree, but as for money I have no doubt it will make alot. Especially worldwide, I mean have you seen how secretive they've been about and how eager the world is to catch even a glimpse if the film, ppl were literally driving by and breaking into the set to take cell phone snap shots of scenerary and shit, trust me, Dragonball will sell.

- BOBSAGAT
( December 14th, 2008 | 4:21 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #11
Gravatar

@Jeff, MIKE, Jonhy Briants, Mikey and BOBSAGAT: Ugh, this is NOT an article about Dragonball in any way shape or form outside of a few measly words, and on top of that, if it were, all of you are arguing how great it will do overseas. This entire article is a discussion of domestic box-office gross.

Please, stay on topic. Dragonball specific comments will be moderated beyond this comment.

I am sure there is a Dragonball forum for such discussions and I am sure there will be future Dragonball related posts, this is not one of them.

- Brad Brevet (Post Author)
( December 14th, 2008 | 5:10 am )
Reply to this comment
Post #12
Gravatar

I really hate how fox gets a decent number of good projects each year then find a way to F*** them up almost everytime. I pray that they dont screw up wolverine tho, cuz it looks very good.

- JD92
( December 15th, 2008 | 5:53 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #13
Gravatar

Excellent points, Brad. Out of all of Fox's upcoming releases, only three interest me: Avatar, Fantastic Mr Fox, and Wolverine.

My list of good Fox films is even narrower than yours:

Master and Commander
Walk The Line
Kingdom of Heaven (Director's Cut)
X2
Revenge of Sith (maybe)
Borat

That's the extent of Fox's quality films since 2003. In short, they haven't made a good film in two years.

- elessar
( December 16th, 2008 | 4:21 pm )
Reply to this comment
Post #14
Gravatar

Tom Rothman can go **** himself.

The only worthy movies that Fox has released over the past 6 years have beenL

X2
Death Sentence
Street Kings
Walk The Line

Fire Tom Rothman. He ruined Live Free or Die Hard along with X-Men The Last Stand and Max Payne.

- Penske Ford
( December 16th, 2008 | 10:16 pm )
Reply to this comment
~ PLEASE NOTE ~
If, in any way, your comment is an attack on the author of this post or a previous commenter, your comment will be deleted without question.
Leave Your Feedback
(required)
(will not be shown) (required)
DON'T WANT YOUR COMMENT DELETED?
Click to Read Our Commenting Rules & Guidelines
Follow Us On Twitter!
RSS Email
Latest Posts
Latest Video
Nine ~ TV Spot
New Pictures
Friend RopeofSilicon on Netflix!