Movie Reviews

'Argo' (2012) Movie Review

A CIA thriller that will get your heart beating

Ben Affleck in Argo
Ben Affleck in Argo
Photo: Warner Bros.
NOTE: This review first appeared on this site on September 7, 2012 after I saw it at the Toronto Film Festival. I am reprinting it here as it hits theaters this weekend.

It's 1979 and the Iranian revolution is reaching a tipping point. Outside the U.S. Embassy in Iran, a group of anti-American protesters have gathered as they have so many days prior, but today (November 4) is different than the rest.

The raging mob eventually hops the fence, they're beating on the doors, breaking windows and soon gain access to the building. Meanwhile, inside, as a result of the insurgence, papers are being shredded and people are trying to escape. Few manage to get away. In fact, while everyone else is held hostage inside, only six get out the backdoor and find refuge at the Canadian Embassy. To show their face outside would mean suicide.

'Argo'
Review
Grade: B+

Argo"Argo" is a Warner Bros. release, directed by and is rated R for language and some violent images.

The cast includes , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and .

For more information on this film including pictures, trailers and a detailed synopsis .

Thus is the set up for Ben Affleck's Argo, a CIA thriller based on a declassified story. The focus is the mission to save said six employees before their identities are revealed, the result of which would most likely end in them being publicly executed. The intensity of the situation I'm describing is mirrored in Affleck's film where he directs and also stars, playing Tony Mendez, a CIA "exfiltration" specialist brought in to help conjure a solution to the problem.

After suggestions ranging from sending the six to the Turkish border on bikes or getting them fake teacher's IDs, Mendez comes up with what is ultimately referred to as the "best bad idea" they have. Referred to as "The Hollywood Solution", his idea involves setting up a fake film production, flying into Iran and extracting the six under the guise of being members of his film crew on a location scout for their fake fantasy project titled Argo.

As ridiculous as it sounds, it's based on a true story, a fact that gives the film so much more weight even though plenty of dramatic license is taken to increase the overall intensity.

Argo, however, extends beyond its true life plot. The film is a perfect storm when it comes to performance, production design, cinematography and screenplay. Affleck immediately sells the '70s vibe using the old Warner logo and a mixture of archival video from the scene outside the Embassy and new, grainy footage shot for the film. The costumes, makeup and hair are perfect and as the credits role you'll see just how exacting the production was in making each member of the cast look almost identical to their real world counterpart.

Along with Affleck the cast is an amazing gathering of talent, some of which are hardly recognizable underneath their facial hair and long 70s 'dos. Alan Arkin and John Goodman play the Hollywood connections. Arkin is blessed with several excellent lines, coining the phrase "Argo-fuck-yourself" (a real phrase, not made up for the movie) along with an amazing monologue opposite Richard Kind playing a Hollywood agent. Scoot McNairy, Tate Donovan, Kerry Bishe, Clea DuVall, Rory Cochrane and Christopher Denham play the six trapped Embassy employees and all fit their respective roles, working well as a distressed collective, letting the audience in on their concerns.

Back home in the CIA and State Department Bryan Cranston, Kyle Chandler and Chris Messina get the bulk of the attention with Bob Gunton and Philip Baker Hall showing up briefly for a great scene in which Cranston refers to them as the "two old guys from 'The Muppets'", which brings me to Chris Terrio's script.

Terrio has never had a feature script of his own produced. He put in a little work on the 2005 film Heights, but Argo is all his own, adapted from Joshuah Bearman's Wired article "How the CIA Used a Fake Sci-Fi Flick to Rescue Americans from Tehran". A combination of Terrio's words and the cast Affleck assembled makes me want to see what else the 35-year-old screenwriter has in store in the coming years. Argo is not only loaded with tension, it's got a lot of great moments and pieces of dialogue that clearly show Terrio has a knack for assembling a story.

The only major concern I had with the film is that it sags a bit in the middle. Affleck is quick to set up his story and the finale is loaded with so many tense twists and turns you can hardly breathe. But, somewhere in-between he gets stuck with the nuts and bolts of the mission and the film plateaus for about 20-30 minutes. Affleck clearly cares about the smaller moments in the film, which I can respect, but maybe a snip here or there would have tightened up the narrative just a bit.

In that respect, the one thing I specifically notice about Affleck is the impression every screenplay he chooses to make is one that interests him immensely. He's not making movies just to make money, he truly has a passion for telling the stories he's telling and you can feel that when you're watching his films. He also has a signature style I can't yet put my figure on, but it's a certain capacity for measured storytelling along with a concentration on making sure the audience never feels as if they are not in store for an entertaining ride.

Some may call into question the veracity of the dramatic finale, but in order to truly get the audience to feel the tension those involved in the situation must have felt some dramatic license must be taken. Affleck definitely ratchets up the ticking time clock scenario as one move leads to the next and every second counts. You'd be right to doubt whether everything played out in real life as it did on screen, but I'd say Affleck gets as close as one possibly can to recreating the level of craziness the group faced while trying to escape.

With Argo, Affleck has delivered yet again and will certainly find ardent supporters to push the Oscar agenda, but forget the awards for a second and let this one wash over you and just wait and see how hard you're gripping the armrests on your chair as the final seconds tick away.

GRADE: B+
Thanks for Reading! Join the Community!
Support the Site! Make it Faster! No Ads!

Your support goes a long way in ensuring RopeofSilicon.com stays stable. For less than the price of one small popcorn, you can can help support RopeofSilicon and, in turn, visit the site every day without ads! Including this one!

Subscribe Now!

Related Links:

More Movie Reviews

'Frank' (2014) Movie ReviewC

Frank (2014)

'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For' (2014) Movie ReviewD+

Sin City: A Dame to Kill For (2014)

'The Trip to Italy' (2014) Movie ReviewB

The Trip to Italy (2014)

'The Expendables 3' (2014) Movie ReviewC+

The Expendables 3 (2014)

Click to Browse Even More Reviews
  • http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/profile/Fan/ Fan

    Very excited for this film. I really like Gone Baby Gone and the Town, but this week is tough, there's this, Sinister and Seven Pyschopaths... I think I'll check this one out first but-- I don't know...

  • JAB

    A "B+"? You have gotta be kidding us. This is clearly an "A" film, a "9/10" & a "10" as a crowd pleaser. This is a very smart, topical, incredibly tense & surprisingly funny movie.
    I had a lump in my throat & damp eyes when the credits rolled. It pulls off the trick that "Apollo 13" did by putting us on th edge of our seats with an conclusion that is decades old. It may be the year's best film.

    • http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/profile/kindofhush/ kindofhush

      I just saw Argo last night and I would give it a C grade. Giving it a B+ is being kind. I am old enough to remember all the crap that happened in Iran in 1979 and 1980. The fact that the story is real and does have some appeal because nobody knew about it but that cannot carry the movie. I love John Goodman and Alan Arkin and there were alot of other good actors in this but the fundamental flaw that I found in this movie is the middle sequence....It is boring, boring and boring.

      The beginning is great and the end is really good but man 30 minutes of the 6 people living in the Canadian Ambassadors House just does not make for exciting movie material no matter how you try and pump it up.

      I had the opportunity to see either this or Skyfall and my wife wanted to see this so I went along. Not the most agonizing time I have spent in a Movie theater ( That would be Apollo 18 ) but I still wished I would have seen Skyfall.

  • http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/profile/Movie_Lou/ Movie_Lou

    Saw the movie twice w/in 72 hours. Once to truly focus on the film and the 2nd time to gauge see what I may have missed the first time along w/gauging the audience's reaction.

    Interesting difference in demographics between a matinee' audience and a prime-time audience. The matinee' audience (primarily consisting of geriatrics) actually clapped when **SPOILER ALERT** the plane launched off the tarmac after being chased by the airport security and/or the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). I had to smile when this happened. This didn't happen during w/the audience during the prime-time viewing. Perhaps this was because the ability to relate to the events was lost on the prime-time (younger) audience.

    The film is simply spectacular. My favorite part of any movie is the characters and character development. How Affleck was able to intertwine history, drama and humor in a compelling and entertaining manner should be applauded.

    While simplistic, Affleck did a good job providing a primer on the causes of the Iranian revolution. Considering the circumstances this country are involved in today w/respect to Iran, I think this is a timely and necessary film.

    The cast is superb! I was mostly impressed w/Brian Cranston (playing Affleck's -Mendez's - supervisor). His character portrayed knowledge, confidence and sincere concern for both Mendez & the mission. Alan Arkin (playing Lester Siegel - film producer) was equally believable, especially delivering his 'argument' to have a company support the film. And who would have thought Tate Donovan (playing Bob Anders) would revive his career from SPACECAMP, circa 1986?! Good for you Tate! (Does he have pics of Affleck in a compromising position? How did he get this role?!)

    If you see the film, please stay for the credits. An important footnote is provided by former President, Jimmy Carter. It's interesting to note ** SPOILER ALERT ** that had this success been allowed to be told to the American public, he may have been elected for a second term. Then again, w/Operation Eagle Claw ending in catastrophe, maybe not.

    I give it an "A".

  • Newbourne

    I appreciated the "ticking time bomb" scenario Affleck was trying to emulate, but the truth is, because this was based on a true story, I never felt the suspense. They were obviously going to make it so it was hardly a big deal every time they made it seem like they were going to get caught.

    It was still a great movie though. I'll go with B+ as well. I think it's the best film I've seen this year, although I haven't seen any other of the contenders. I hope I can get around to it in the coming weeks.

  • Sam

    I just watched the first two minutes of this movie where it tries to explain Iran history, most probably for the audience who does not have any knowledge in that area. Unfortunately, when it came to the contemporary history of Iran and telling stories such as milk bath of the last queen or starving people of Iran etc. I recognized that it'd be a waste of time to watch the rest of such a biased story and I'm wondering what this movie tries to promote ... specially as nowadays everybody can refer to the records and see the economic growth of Iran in 70's, the life style of the Iranian middle class by then and the credibility of the government ... Actually, I'm wondering what kind of audience is targeted by the producers, at least in Europe, people with a little interest on the contemporary Iranian history know that the last queen of Iran is and has been a social right activist. I didn't see the whole movie but are they trying to pretend that the revolution of Iran is rooted in the poverty of the nation or the non democrat inefficient governance of the shah? what would happen if people knew the truth behind the Iranian revolution and the real beneficiaries?